Assessing Innovation
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 19

Assessing Innovation Systems in Australia Don Scott-Kemmis PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 85 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Assessing Innovation Systems in Australia Don Scott-Kemmis Innovation Management and Policy Program National Graduate School of Management Australian National University. Evolution of Innovation Systems. NIS a useful concept but not yet a strong framework for analysis and evaluation

Download Presentation

Assessing Innovation Systems in Australia Don Scott-Kemmis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Assessing innovation systems in australia don scott kemmis

  • Assessing Innovation Systems in Australia

    • Don Scott-Kemmis

    • Innovation Management and Policy Program

    • National Graduate School of Management

    • Australian National University


Evolution of innovation systems

Evolution of Innovation Systems

  • NIS a useful concept but not yet a strong framework for analysis and evaluation

  • Innovation systems approaches challenging to apply in Australia – fragmentation, international links.

  • Systemic failure can be a driver of evolution

  • Analysing how innovation systems evolve and respond to failure should give insight into the NIS


The laggard perspective on australia

The Laggard Perspective on Australia

High dependence on natural resources- 80% of the top fifteen export products are resource-based commodities with a low level of processing

Failing to develop new areas of specialisation and growth

Productivity growth in the 90's the result of one-offs: micro-economic & ICT

Weaknesses in new firm formation

The poor performance in R&D and patenting signals the weaknesses in management, scale and international positioning of Australian industry.

Declining position in many ‘high tech’ sectors indicates the extent to which Australia is being left behind the frontier of innovation and growth- Large and growing trade deficit in ICT products and services

One of the lowest in the OECD in

  • BERD

  • investment in venture capital;

  • International patenting activity (per mill. Population)


The boom perspective on australia

The Boom Perspective on Australia

A broadly based dynamic and flexible economy, diversified across markets, and increasingly sectors, underpinned by competitive domestic markets and flexible labour markets.

High-level human resources and strong research organisations facilitate the rapid uptake of new knowledge produced anywhere.

Imported knowledge and equipment combined with local knowledge and capability supports active problem solving and systems integration in a range of sectors generating relatively high levels of productivity.

A ‘fast-user’ strategy combined with natural and human resources is a sound basis for future prosperity.

  • High and increasing productivity;

  • Relatively high level of public sector R&D;

  • Substantial growth in niches markets in key manufacturing sectors: automobiles and components, wine, boats.

  • Maintaining strong competitiveness in resources sectors through the effective application of new technology, including IT;

  • A strong ICT services sector and high growth in ‘knowledge based services’;

  • Rapid and broadly-based uptake of new ICT.


Characteristics of australian innovation 1

Characteristics of Australian Innovation-1

Knowledge Based Resource Industries

Conservative Evolution

  • Scientific strengths

  • Technological specialisation

  • Patenting behaviour

  • Specialisation in export products


Assessing innovation systems in australia don scott kemmis

Changes in ‘revealed comparative advantage’ in Australian scientific publications output in four periods


Science linkage vs technology cycle time 1980 2001

Science Linkage vs. Technology Cycle Time (1980-2001)


Characteristics of australian innovation 2

Characteristics of Australian Innovation-2

Systems Integration Plus

  • No core technology production

  • Problem solving – but sophisticated

  • Technology mobilisation for resource based industries and services

  • ICT diffusion through the innovation system


Australia major r d fields of technological skills rf 2000 01 of gdp

Australia – major R&D fields of technological skills (RF),2000–01 (% of GDP)


Approach to analysis looking at change sectoral approach more or less

Approach to Analysis: Looking at Change.Sectoral Approach– more or less!

  • Building Blocks

  • Actors and Networks: interaction, competences

  • Knowledge Bases: appropriation, acquisition, increasing returns

  • Institutions: coordination, incentives, ‘rules of the game’, standards.

  • Technological structure

  • Problem solving


  • Innovation system evolution phases

    Innovation System Evolution Phases

    Techno-economic opportunity

    Emergence

    Growth

    Renovation

    Techno-economic problem


    Different stages need different assessment frameworks

    Different Stages Need Different Assessment Frameworks


    A possible approach to functions in the evolution of innovation systems

    A Possible Approach to Functions in the Evolution of Innovation Systems

    Guide Search

    Resource supply

    Reduce social uncertainty

    Incentives to innovate

    Identify Problems

    Create new Knowledge

    Selection

    Recognise the potential for growth

    Facilitate Kn & Info Exchange

    Stimulate/ create markets

    Counteract resistance to change

    Based on Johnson, 2001


    A possible approach to an innovation systems failure framework

    Innovation Systems Failure Framework

     ‘Rules’: System failures

    Actors – missing actors

    Demand

    Compan’s

    Kn. Org’ns

    Third Parties

    Infrastructural failures:

    Institut’l failure

    Hard:

    Soft:

    Govern’ce

    Interact’n failure

    Weak

    Strong

    Capabilities failure

    A Possible Approach to an Innovation Systems Failure Framework

    Based on Woolthuis et al (2004)


    Systemic problems and responses in the evolution of the wine industry

    Knowledge Base

    Actors & Interaction

    Institutions

    1960s

    Excess capacity

    major corpns brings prof’l mngmt

    Dev’t of export market Kn.

    Old family companies

    Growth of large local wine companies

    Breaking out of the euro paradigm

    1970

    Developing the robust product design and the ‘system’

    Kn. Based prod’n

    Specialisation in all aspects

    Strong networking

    Strong training organisations

    rural R&D framework.

    industry associations effective collective action & lobbying

    Export standards

    Industry ‘visions’

    1980-2000

    Rapid growth

    Strong kn. base in major firms

    Kn. sharing.

    use of int’l Kn.

    new analytical techniques

    Increasing scale

    specialist service providers

    vocational training.

    Consolidation of the institutional framework.

    Systemic Problems and Responses in the Evolution of the Wine Industry


    Systemic problems and responses in the evolution of minerals exploration

    Systemic Problems and Responses in the Evolution of MineralsExploration


    Emerging photovoltaic innovation systems

    Increasing returns

    Institutional Alignment

    Standard’n and Reuse of knowledge

    System Failures

    (examples)

    Lack of economies of scale

    Ad-hoc policies

    lack of political & social legitimation

    Low level of subsides and incentives

    Excellent science base but policies have limited the level of experimentation

    Relevant but fragmented knowledge base -mainly exploited by overseas innovation systems

    Much of the RAPS based knowledge cannot be applied to urban systems

    Lack of industrial actors with resources to bring technology to mass-production

    Level of incentives to attract large firms

    Lack of a national climate for supporting renewable energy

    Emerging Photovoltaic Innovation Systems


    Focus and change

    Focus and Change

    • Specialisation and Coordination

      -organisations and institutions for bridging, collaboration, coordination

    • Local problem solving and global search

    • Focus and Diversity

      -Co-evolution of supply and demand,

      -Broad kn & education base ensuring diversity for perceptions of problems & opportunities, initiating new trajectories problem solving, renovation of knowledge bases


  • Login