1 / 13

Involvement with Practitioner Research

Involvement with Practitioner Research. Developing Research and Evaluation Cultures Studying for a Qualification. Developing Research and Evaluation Culture. Careers/Connexions Service Education Action Zones PLRI AimHigher and Widening Participation ‘Teams’

ursa
Download Presentation

Involvement with Practitioner Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Involvement with Practitioner Research • Developing Research and Evaluation Cultures • Studying for a Qualification Paul Davies, Lancaster University, April 2008

  2. Developing Research and Evaluation Culture • Careers/Connexions Service • Education Action Zones • PLRI • AimHigher and Widening Participation ‘Teams’ • Specialist Schools and Academies Trust Paul Davies, Lancaster University, April 2008

  3. Studying for a Qualification • CPDA • Foundation Degrees • MA - Adult Literacy, Numeracy and ESOL • MA - Professional Studies Paul Davies, Lancaster University, April 2008

  4. What is Practitioner Research? • Insider Research • Action Research • Teacher Researchers • Evidence-based Practitioners • Reflective Practitioners Paul Davies, Lancaster University, April 2008

  5. Why do Practitioner Research? • Themselves • The Organisation • The ‘Wider Community’ Paul Davies, Lancaster University, April 2008

  6. Types of Projects • Impact/Effectiveness Studies • Feasibility/Development Studies • Reaction Studies • Insight Studies Paul Davies, Lancaster University, April 2008

  7. Characteristics of Practitioner Research • Problem/Solution Focused • Case Studies - limited resources and good access to specific data • Provide a contribution to practice rather than theory, and one that is modest • Very influenced by context Paul Davies, Lancaster University, April 2008

  8. What is Practitioner Research? • Follow the ‘gold standard’ of full time academic research? • A semi-academic exercise? • A professional development exercise? • A distinct approach to research? Paul Davies, Lancaster University, April 2008

  9. Academic Research • Research viewed as ‘problematic’ • Locate within a research approach or tradition • Justify the chosen methods, samples, etc • Acknowledge the limitations • Written for (in which order?) academics, policy makers, practitioners? Paul Davies, Lancaster University, April 2008

  10. Characteristics of Practitioner Research • Approach, theory, methodology - “good enough” • Format - accessible and appealing to multiple audiences • Findings - “relatability” • Dissemination of findings - challenging Paul Davies, Lancaster University, April 2008

  11. Role and Value of Practitioner Research • Influence on Practice? • Staff Development? • Community Building? • Contribution to Enlightened, Learning Organisations? • Bridge between the ‘worlds’ of practitioners and full time researchers? Paul Davies, Lancaster University, April 2008

  12. Is Practitioner Research Different? • Depends on context - whether the practitioner is feels independent or closely linked to an organisation such as a university? • If linked to as university linked as what - a student, a mentee, a colleague? Paul Davies, Lancaster University, April 2008

  13. Is Practitioner Research Different? • Depends on context - if PR is located between the ‘worlds’ of academic research and practice - what is the nature of the relative ‘gravitational pulls’? • Does Practitioner Research try to fulfil the demands of one ‘world’ and just be ‘good enough’ for the other? Paul Davies, Lancaster University, April 2008

More Related