1 / 44

Ratio analysis Du Pont system Effects of improving ratios Limitations of ratio analysis

CHAPTER 5 Analysis of Financial Statements. Ratio analysis Du Pont system Effects of improving ratios Limitations of ratio analysis Qualitative factors. Cajun Made’s Balance Sheet: Assets. 1999E. 1998. Cash. 85,632. 7,282. AR. 878,000. 632,160. Inventories. 1,716,480. 1,287,360.

ursa-deleon
Download Presentation

Ratio analysis Du Pont system Effects of improving ratios Limitations of ratio analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CHAPTER 5 Analysis of Financial Statements • Ratio analysis • Du Pont system • Effects of improving ratios • Limitations of ratio analysis • Qualitative factors

  2. Cajun Made’s Balance Sheet: Assets 1999E 1998 Cash 85,632 7,282 AR 878,000 632,160 Inventories 1,716,480 1,287,360 Total CA 2,680,112 1,926,802 Gross FA 1,197,160 1,202,950 Less: Deprec. 380,120 263,160 Net FA 817,040 939,790 Total assets 3,497,152 2,866,592

  3. Liabilities and Equity 1999E 1998 Accounts payable 436,800 524,160 Notes payable 600,000 720,000 Accruals 408,000 489,600 Total CL 1,444,800 1,733,760 Long-term debt 500,000 1,000,000 Common stock 1,680,936 460,000 Retained earnings (128,584) (327,168) Total equity 1,552,352 132,832 Total L & E 3,497,152 2,866,592

  4. Cajun Made’s Income Statement 1999E 1998 Sales 7,035,600 5,834,400 COGS 5,728,000 5,728,000 Other expenses 680,000 680,000 Depreciation 116,960 116,960 Tot. op. costs 6,524,960 6,524,960 EBIT 510,640 (690,560) Interest exp. 88,000 176,000 EBT 422,640 (866,560) Taxes (40%) 169,056 (346,624) Net income 253,584 (519,936)

  5. Other Data 1999E 1998 Shares out. 250,000 100,000 EPS $1.014 ($5.199) DPS $0.220 $0.110 Stock price $12.17 $2.25 Lease pmts $40,000 $40,000

  6. The Use of Financial Ratios • Financial ratio is a relative measure that facilitates the evaluation of efficiency or condition of a particular aspect of a firm’s operations and status. • Ratio Analysis involves methods of calculating and interpreting financial ratios in order to assess a firm’s performance and status.

  7. Why are ratios useful? • Standardize numbers; facilitate comparisons • Used to highlight weaknesses and strengths • There are two types of ratio comparisons that can be made • Cross-Sectional Analysis • Time-Series Analysis

  8. What are the five major categories of ratios, and what questions do they answer? • Liquidity: Can we make required payments? A “liquid firm” is one that can meet its short-term obligations as they come due. • Asset management (Activity): Right amount of assets vs. sales? Activity is a more sophisticated analysis of a firm’ liquidity, evaluating the speed with which certain accounts are converted into sales or cash; also measures a firm’s efficiency.

  9. Debt management: Right mix of debt and equity? Debt is a “double-edged” sword as it allows for the generation of profits with the use of other people’s (creditors) money, but creates claims on earnings with a higher priority than those of the firm’s owners. • Financial Leverage is a term for the magnification of risk and return resulting from the use of fixed-cost financing such as debt & preferred stock. • There are two general types of Debt Measures. • Degree of Indebtedness • Ability to Service Debts

  10. Profitability: Do sales prices exceed unit costs, and are sales high enough as reflected in PM, ROE, and ROA? These measure assess the firm’s ability to operate efficiently and are of concern to owners, creditors, and management. • A common-size income statement, which expresses each income statement item as a percentage of sales, allows for easy evaluation of the firm’s profitability relative to sales. • Market value: Do investors like what they see as reflected in P/E and M/B ratios?

  11. Calculate Cajun Made’s Expected current and quick ratios for 1999. $2,680 $1,445 CA CL CR99 = = = 1.85x. CA - Inv. CL QR99 = $2,680 - $1,716 $1,445 = = 0.67x.

  12. Comments on CR and QR 1999 1998 1997 Ind. CR 1.85x 1.1x 2.3x 2.7x QR 0.67x 0.4x 0.8x 1.0x • Expected to improve but still below the industry average. • Liquidity position is weak.

  13. COGS Inventories Inv. turnover = = = 3.34x. $5,728 $1,716 1999 1998 1997 Ind. Inv. T. 3.34X 4.45x 4.0x 6.1x What is the inventory turnover ratio vs. the industry average?

  14. Comments on Inventory Turnover • Inventory turnover is below industry average. • Cajun Made might have old inventory, or its control might be poor. • No improvement is currently forecasted.

  15. Average Collection Period (DSO) is the average number of days after making a sale before receiving cash. Receivables Average sales per day ACP = = = = 44.9. Receivables Sales/360 $878 $7,036/360

  16. Appraisal of ACP (DSO) 1999 1998 1997 Ind. ACP 44.9 39.0 36.8 32.0 • Cajun Made collects too slowly, and is getting worse. • Poor credit policy.

  17. Fixed assets turnover Sales Net fixed assets = = = 8.61x. $7,036 $817 Total assets turnover Sales Total assets = = = 2.01x. $7,036 $3,497 F.A. and T.A. turnover vs. industry average

  18. 1999 1998 1997 Ind. FA TO 8.6x 6.2x 10.0x 7.0x TA TO 2.0x 2.0x 2.3x 2.6x • FA turnover project to exceed industry average. Good. • TA turnover not up to industry average. Caused by excessive current assets (A/R and inv.)

  19. Total debt Total assets Debt ratio = = = 55.6%. $1,445 + $500 $3,497 EBIT Int. expense TIE = = = 5.8x. $510.6 $88 Calculate the debt, TIE, and fixed charge coverage ratios.

  20. Fixed charge coverage = FCC EBIT + Lease payments Interest Lease Sinking fund pmt. expense pmt. (1 - T) = = = 4.3x. + + $510.6 +$40 $88 + $40 + $0 All three ratios reflect use of debt, but focus on different aspects.

  21. How do the debt management ratios compare with industry averages? 1999 1998 1997 Ind. D/A 55.6% 95.4% 54.8% 50.0% TIE 5.8x -3.9x 3.3x 6.2x FCC 4.3x -3.0x 2.4x 5.1x Too much debt, but projected to improve.

  22. NI Sales $253.6 $7,036 P.M. = = = 3.6%. Profit margin vs. industry average? 1999 1998 1997 Ind. P.M. 3.6% -8.9% 2.6% 3.5% Very bad in 1998, but projected to exceed industry average in 1999. Looking good.

  23. BEP vs. Industry Average? EBIT Total assets BEP = = = 14.6%. $510.6 $3,497

  24. 1999 1998 1997 Ind. BEP 14.6% -24.1% 14.2% 19.1% • BEP removes effect of taxes and financial leverage. Useful for comparison. • Projected to be below average. • Room for improvement.

  25. Return on Assets Net income Total assets ROA = = = 7.3%. $253.6 $3,497

  26. Net income Common equity ROE = = = 16.3%. $253.6 $1,552 1999 1998 1997 Ind. ROA 7.3% -18.1% 6.0% 9.1% ROE 16.3% -391.0% 13.3% 18.2% Both below average but improving.

  27. Effects of Debt on ROA and ROE • ROA is lowered by debt--interest lowers NI, which also lowers ROA = NI/Assets. • But use of debt lowers equity, hence could raise ROE = NI/Equity.

  28. Price = $12.17. EPS = = = $1.01. P/E = = = 12x. NI Shares out. $253.6 250 Price per share EPS $12.17 $1.01 Calculate and appraise the P/E and M/B ratios.

  29. Com. equity Shares out. BVPS = = = $6.21. $1,552 250 Mkt. price per share Book value per share M/B = = = 1.96x. $12.17 $6.21

  30. 1999 1998 1997 Ind. P/E 12.0x -0.4x 9.7x 14.2x M/B 1.96x 1.7x 1.3x 2.4x • P/E: How much investors will pay for $1 of earnings. High is good. • M/B: How much paid for $1 of BV. Higher is good. • P/E and M/B are high if ROE is high, risk is low.

  31. ( )( )( ) = ROE x x = ROE. Profit margin TA turnover Equity multiplier NI Sales Sales TA TA CE 1997 2.6% x 2.3 x 2.2 = 13.2% 1998 -8.9% x 2.0 x 21.9 = -391.0% 1999 3.6% x 2.0 x 2.3 = 16.3% Ind. 3.5% x 2.6 x 2.0 = 18.2%

  32. The Du Pont system focuses on: • Expense control (P.M.) • Asset utilization (TATO) • Debt utilization (Eq. Mult.) It shows how these factors combine to determine the ROE.

  33. Simplified Cajun Made Data A/R 878 1,945 Debt Other CA 1,802 Equity 1,552 Net FA 817 Total assets $3,497 $3,497 L&E Sales $7,035,600 day 360 = = $19,543. Q. How would reducing DSO to 32 days affect the company?

  34. Effect of reducing DSO from 44.9 days to 32 days: Old A/R = 19,543 x 44.9 = 878,000 New A/R = 19,543 x 32.0 = 625,376 Cash freed up: 252,624 Initially shows up as additional cash.

  35. Added cash $ 253 Debt $1,945 A/R 625 Equity 1,552 Other CA 1,802 Net FA 817 Total assets $3,497 Total L&E $3,497 New Balance Sheet What could be done with the new cash? Effect on stock price and risk?

  36. Potential use of freed up cash • Repurchase stock. Higher ROE, higher EPS. • Expand business. Higher profits. • Reduce debt. Better debt ratio; lower interest, hence higher NI. • All these actions would improve stock price.

  37. Inventories are also too high. Could analyze the effect of an inventory reduction on freeing up cash and increasing the quick ratio and asset management ratios--similar to what was done with DSO in slides #33 - #35.

  38. Q. Would you lend money to the company? A. Maybe. Things could get better. In business, one has to take some chances!

  39. Cajun Made should not have relied exclusively on debt to finance its expansion.

  40. What are some potential problems and limitations of financial ratio analysis? • Comparison with industry averages is difficult if the firm operates many different divisions. • A single ratio rarely tells enough to make a sound judgement • Audited Financial statements are more reliable than un-audited statements.

  41. “Average” performance not necessarily good. • Seasonal factors can distort ratios. • Inflation can distort comparisons. • “Window dressing” techniques can make statements and ratios look better.

  42. Different operating and accounting practices distort comparisons. • Sometimes hard to tell if a ratio is “good” or “bad.” • Difficult to tell whether company is, on balance, in strong or weak position. • Ratios should be computed in the same manner • For example, Inventory Turnover can be computed as Sales/Ending Inventory, COGS/Ending Inventory, or COGS/Average Inventory (I can show you three different texts with three different computations). • You must be consistent in your computations.

  43. What are some qualitative factors analysts should consider when evaluating a company’s likely future financial performance? • Are the company’s revenues tied to 1 key customer? • To what extent are the company’s revenues tied to 1 key product? • To what extent does the company rely on a single supplier? (Cont…)

  44. What percentage of the company’s business is generated overseas? • Competition • Future prospects • Legal and regulatory environment

More Related