Portage lake watershed forever plan
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 33

Portage Lake Watershed Forever Plan PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 103 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Portage Lake Watershed Forever Plan. Joint Executive Committee and Technical Advisor Meeting August 2, 2007. Agenda. Welcome and introductions Portage Lake Watershed Forever endowment fund update Progress report Recommended strategy for Phase II Next meeting date Adjourn.

Download Presentation

Portage Lake Watershed Forever Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Portage lake watershed forever plan

Portage Lake Watershed Forever Plan

Joint Executive Committee and Technical Advisor Meeting

August 2, 2007


Agenda

Agenda

  • Welcome and introductions

  • Portage Lake Watershed Forever endowment fund update

  • Progress report

  • Recommended strategy for Phase II

  • Next meeting date

  • Adjourn


Progress report overview

Progress Report Overview

  • Summary of public engagement

  • Phase I report transitioning into watershed plan

  • Plan updates and other follow-up

  • Summary of meeting with MDEQ


Public engagement update

Public Engagement Update

  • Focus Groups

    • Seasonal resident meeting—June 28

    • Final summary of 8 focus groups and community forum on website

    • Nearly 150 people participated in total, representing diverse interests

    • Informed household survey instrument and the watershed plan

  • Portage Point Summer Resort Corp. Annual Meeting


Public engagement update1

Public Engagement Update

  • Household Survey

    • Targeted year-round and seasonal residents

    • 228 completed, 28% of households in watershed

    • Collected information about:

      • How residents use surface water in the watershed

      • Water quality concerns

      • Goals for improvement/protection

      • Where residents get information


Household survey

Household Survey

  • Activities:

    • Boating

    • Swimming

    • Fishing

  • Most rated overall water quality as excellent/ good and better than other lakes

  • Concerns:

    • Invasive, exotic species

    • Failing/poorly maintained septic systems

    • Lack of understanding about how actions impact water quality


Household survey1

Household Survey

  • Protection goals:

    • Lake Michigan sand dune and beach areas

    • Natural features that help maintain water quality (e.g., wetlands and buffer strips)

  • Protection actions:

    • Addressing unplugged and abandoned hydrocarbon and mineral wells

    • Getting more students involved

    • More effective planning for future growth by local leaders


Household survey2

Household Survey

  • Respondents get information from local newspaper (not local cable, radio, Internet, e-mail, or newsletters)

  • Most trustworthy information sources

    • Neighborhood/lake association

    • Manistee County Health Department

    • University Extension, professors, and scientists


Household survey3

Household Survey

  • Other tidbits

    • 38% of respondents live on Portage Lake/river/stream

    • 74% are full time residents, 26% are seasonal residents

    • 80% of respondents maintain a grass lawn

    • 93% have a washing machine

    • 45% have a garbage disposal

    • 72% have a dishwasher

    • 81% of respondents are served by a septic system:

      • 84% have had their system inspected and/or pumped out in the last five years

      • Nearly half (41%) of septic systems are less than 10 years old.


Watershed plan updates

Watershed Plan Updates

  • Phase I report is transitioning into watershed plan

  • We are addressing questions and comments raised at last meeting and meeting with MDEQ

  • Updated draft plan posted on website by August 31, 2007


Updated land use

Updated Land Use

Source: Center for Geographic Information, Michigan Department of Information Technology, 2001.


Land use cover projections

Land Use/Cover Projections

SOURCE : The Computational Ecology and Visualization Lab/Michigan Statue University Land Policy Institute, 2007

Based on MDNR – Michigan Resource Information (MiRIS) data


Land use cover projection summary

Land Use/Cover Projection Summary


General soils map

General Soils Map

SOURCE: United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service, Grayling Area Office, 2007.


Location of oil and gas wells

Location of Oil and Gas Wells

SOURCE: Center for Geographic Information, Michigan Department of Information Technology, 2007.


Underground storage tank sites

Underground Storage Tank Sites

SOURCE: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, 2007.


Threatened endangered and species of concern

Threatened, Endangered and Species of Concern

SOURCE: Michigan Natural Features Inventory - MSU Extension, Watershed Element Data.


Additional updates

Additional Updates

  • Additional characterization of water quality data for tributaries

  • Hydrology and precipitation data

  • Additional information on invasive species

    • Connection to Great Lakes

    • Plant, animals, diseases

  • MDNR fish stocking data since 2000

  • Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Walleye Recruitment Assessment data


Additional updates1

Additional Updates

  • Information about water well nitrate levels and uncapped wells

  • Air quality information (Tribe not currently monitoring toxics or nutrients)

  • Additional data from Onekama Schools water quality monitoring (pre-2004 and 2007 data)

  • Onekama Township 2006 water quality monitoring data (will not be included in plan)


Additional follow up

Additional Follow Up

  • Beach monitoring during times of heavy use—assisting Onekama Township with a 2007 interim monitoring strategy

  • Additional dissolved oxygen profiles during summer stratification—MDNR completed July 16

  • Information on how to identify Eurasian water milfoil (posted on website)


Eurasian water milfoil

Eurasian Water Milfoil

SOURCE: Wisconsin DNR, 2004.


Meeting with mdeq

Meeting with MDEQ

  • Purpose: Discuss approval requirements

  • Participants: PSC, PLWF, MDEQ

  • Summary

    • Agreed on components and general outline

    • Not anticipated that additional data collection will be required

    • Recommend consideration of inventory work by committees, if there is a need and can be led by volunteers

    • Additional needs for monitoring/inventorying can be identified as action items in plan


Meeting with mdeq1

Meeting with MDEQ

  • Additional information needed

    • More detailed description/info on tributaries

    • Hydrology and precipitation

    • Chart of designated and desired uses, sources, and causes

    • Estimates of known or suspected pollutant loadings

    • List and map critical areas for designated and desired uses, organized by threat or opportunity

    • Analysis of how/if local programs, projects, and plans could further watershed plan goals and objectives


Meeting with mdeq2

Meeting with MDEQ

  • Additional information needed

    • Development of long-term goals, measurable short-term outcomes, and tasks—including time frame and cost estimate for each task


Meeting with mdeq3

Meeting with MDEQ

  • General comment: The primary purpose of the plan is to help the community identify what should be done next—and why—to protect the Portage Lake Watershed

  • MDEQ review could take 45–60 days per draft, including Lansing review

  • This meeting provided foundation for finalizing Phase II strategy


Phase ii strategy

Phase II Strategy

  • Identify and prioritize potential threats, pollutants, sources, and causes for designated and desired uses

  • Establish long-term goals for protecting designated and desired uses

  • List and map critical area for meeting goals for designated and desired uses

  • Establish measurable objectives and identify management measures and other actions to help achieve goals


Phase ii strategy1

Phase II Strategy

  • Inform, educate, and engage the public

  • Analyze how/if local programs, projects, and plans could further plan goals and objectives

  • Develop an evaluation process to track plan progress

  • Assemble the Portage Lake Watershed Forever Plan and submit to MDEQ

    Total cost = $50, 015


Additional recommendations

Additional Recommendations

Although not requirements of approvable watershed plans, the following are viewed as priority needs:

  • Portage Lake Watershed Forever website ($5,800)

  • Comprehensive water quality monitoring strategy ($3,000)


Phase ii time line

Phase II Time Line

  • Elements of Phase II are already under way

  • Draft plan submitted to Executive Committee and Technical Advisors by September 30

  • Draft plan submitted to MDEQ by October 31 (after review by EC, TA, PLWF Committee)


Request for committee assistance

Request for Committee Assistance

  • Goals:

    • Community engagement

    • Leveraging local talent/building capacity

    • Cost efficiency

  • Priority inventory needs

  • Website

  • Analysis of local programs, projects, plans

  • Fund raising for near-term needs

  • Additional ideas?


Discussion and request for approval

Discussion and Request for Approval


Next meeting date

Next Meeting Date

Goal–Setting Session

Joint Executive Committee and

Technical Advisor Meeting

September 4, 2007

4:00–6:00 PM

Manistee County Road Commission

Community Meeting Room


Portage lake watershed forever plan

Thank You!Your time and input are critical to making the Portage Lake Watershed Forever Plan and its implementation a success.


  • Login