1 / 66

The Total Synthesis of Phalarine : Racemic and Enantiopure Routes

The Total Synthesis of Phalarine : Racemic and Enantiopure Routes. Anthony Pianosi CHM 8256S December 9, 2010. Where Does Phalarine Come From?. Phalaris coerulescens (Blue Canary Grass). Colgate and colleagues isolated phalarine in 1999

urania
Download Presentation

The Total Synthesis of Phalarine : Racemic and Enantiopure Routes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Total Synthesis of Phalarine:Racemic and Enantiopure Routes Anthony Pianosi CHM 8256S December 9, 2010

  2. Where Does Phalarine Come From? Phalariscoerulescens (Blue Canary Grass) • Colgate and colleagues isolated phalarine in 1999 • currently, no promising biological activity known • possesses a novel furanobisindole alkaloid structure Phytochemistry1999, 51, 153-157

  3. Structure of Phalarine C3 C2 • novel furanobisindole alkaloid structure • two stereocenters: C2 and C3 • gramine-related moiety (EF) interlocked with • carboline-related subunit (ABC) via ring (D) Phytochemistry1999, 51, 153-157 Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  4. Propeller-Like Interlocking C3 C3 C2 C2 C2 C3

  5. Danishefsky Attempts A Total Synthesis • structural novelty draws attention • of Danishefsky’s lab • began synthesis of phalarine with • model studies Samuel J. Danishefsky Li, C.; Chan, C.; Heimann, A.; Danishefsky, S. J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2007, 46, 1448-1450

  6. Retrosynthesis

  7. Initial Model Study Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 4839-4841

  8. Reasons For Incorrect Regiochemistry Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 4839-4841

  9. Reasoning For Second Model Study Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 4839-4841

  10. Second Model Study Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 4839-4841

  11. Reasons For Undesired Product Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 4839-4841

  12. Attempt atReordering of Bond Formation C3 C2 SEQUENCE FOR BOND FORMATION 1. C C between carbolineC2and aryl moiety 2. C O at carbolineC3 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2007, 46, 1448-1450

  13. Retrosynthesis

  14. Retrosynthesis

  15. Synthesis of AzaspiroOxindole Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2007, 46, 1448-1450

  16. Formation of C2-Aryl Bond Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2007, 46, 1448-1450

  17. Rearrangement Unsuccessful Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2007, 46, 1448-1450

  18. Reasons for Failed Rearrangement Reasons: 1. urethane-bound methylene has low propensity for migration 2. hydrogen bonding ( ) would restrict rotation Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  19. Reasons for Failed Rearrangement 1. urethane-bound methylene has low propensity for migration Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  20. Reasons for Failed Rearrangement 2. hydrogen bonding ( ) would restrict rotation Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  21. What’s Next?.....Improve Migratory Tendency 1. Replace urethane with an N-methyl function REASONS: N-METHYL IS ELECTRON DONATING HIGHER LIKELYHOOD OF MIGRATION Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  22. What’s Next?.....Remove Hydrogen Bonding 2. Incorporate an activating tosyl (Ts) function REASONS: ELIMINATES HYDROGEN BONDING PERMITS FREE ROTATION Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  23. Preparation of New Substrate Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2007, 46, 1448-1450

  24. Preparation of New Substrate Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2007, 46, 1448-1450

  25. Rearrangement Achieved Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2007, 46, 1448-1450

  26. Phalarine’s Core Synthesized Result: - appropriate activating functions allow for desired rearrangement - can proceed with the total synthesis of phalarine Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2007, 46, 1448-1450

  27. Introduction of Amine Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2007, 46, 1448-1450

  28. GassmanOxindole Synthesis Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2007, 46, 1448-1450

  29. Completion of Racemic Synthesis Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2007, 46, 1448-1450

  30. Important Mechanistic Questions Remain - concerning the pathway of the key skeletal rearrangement…. RECALL - at this point, two possible pathways present themselves…. Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  31. ? Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  32. Wagner-Meerwein Gives Single Enantiomer Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  33. Retro-Mannich Gives Achiral Intermediate Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  34. Achiral Intermediate Leads to Racemate Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  35. Why Is This Important? CORRECT MECHANISTIC INSIGHTS LEAD TO….. NATURAL ENANTIOMER OF PHALARINE

  36. Initiate Synthesis With Single Enantiomer Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  37. EnantiopureOxindole Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  38. Racemization During Cyclization Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  39. Rules Out Wagner-Meerwein Pathway

  40. Retro-Mannich Then Pictet-Spengler

  41. Pictet-Spengler Reaction Mechanism Chem. Rev.1995, 95, 1797-1842

  42. Pictet-Spengler Reaction Mechanism Chem. Rev.1995, 95, 1797-1842

  43. ?

  44. Retro-Mannich Cleavage Problems • retro-Mannich cleavage step was preventing progress towards • enantiopurephalarine • at this point, Danishefsky and colleagues investigated an • alternative to the chemistry described earlier J. Am. Chem. Soc.2010, 132, 8506-8512 Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  45. Build a New Indole System C3 C2 suitable aromatic structure at C2 2. ethylamino group at C3 REASONS: 1. determine feasibility of achiral intermediate develop further insights into the mechanism of the Pictet-Spengler reaction J. Am. Chem. Soc.2010, 132, 8506-8512 Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  46. Synthesizing New Indole J. Am. Chem. Soc.2010, 132, 8506-8512 Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  47. Synthesizing New Indole J. Am. Chem. Soc.2010, 132, 8506-8512 Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  48. Pictet-Spengler Attempt Successful J. Am. Chem. Soc.2010, 132, 8506-8512 Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  49. Achiral Intermediate is Feasible C3 C2 BUT………….MECHANISTIC UNCERTAINTY REMAINS! CYCLIZATION AT C2 OR CYCLIZATION AT C3 J. Am. Chem. Soc.2010, 132, 8506-8512 Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

  50. What is the Minimum Rearrangement Criteria? RECALL Pure Appl. Chem.2010, 82, 1735-1748

More Related