1 / 10

Reflecting on Grounded Practical Theory

Reflecting on Grounded Practical Theory . Robert T. Craig University of Colorado at Boulder International Communication Association Montreal, Quebec May 24, 2008. Grounded Practical Theory (GPT).

umed
Download Presentation

Reflecting on Grounded Practical Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reflecting on Grounded Practical Theory Robert T. Craig University of Colorado at Boulder International Communication Association Montreal, Quebec May 24, 2008

  2. Grounded Practical Theory (GPT) • “The grounded description, critique, and theoretical reconstruction of communication problems, techniques, and situated ideals…” (Craig & Tracy,1995, p. 250) • Alternative to scientific theory – addresses normative (ought) questions • Grounded in empirical description & critique • Weak normativity – reasoned arguments potentially useful for practical reflection and deliberation

  3. Philosophical Sources • Aristotle (praxis, phronesis) • Pragmatism (Dewey – theory of inquiry; Schön – reflection in action) • Hermeneutics (Gadamer – understanding as application) • Critical Theory (Habermas – critique as discursive reflection) • Practical Discipline (Craig, 1989; communication studies as cultivation of communication as a social practice)

  4. Aristotle’s Organization of the Sciences Adapted from Levine, 1995, p. 111.

  5. Outline of GPT Method • Specifying a practice (unitizing, naming, positioning) • Empirical data collection (contextual background, samples of situated discourse and metadiscourse illustrating key problems and practices) • Theoretical reconstruction (generalization and idealization of selected elements “such that values and principles implicit in the practice are made explicit and a reasoned basis for ‘good practice’ and critical judgments of practice is constructed”)

  6. A Problem-Centered Ideal Model • GPT reconstructs a practice on three interrelated levels: • Problem: Dilemmas typically encountered • Technical: Repertoire of strategies for problems • Philosophical: Reasoned principles to govern the use of techniques

  7. Selected Applications • Academic colloquia (Tracy, 1997) • Feminist organizing (Ashcraft, 2001, 2006) • GDSS facilitation (Aakhus, 2001) • “The issue” (Craig & Tracy, 2005) • Crisis negotiation (Agne, 2007) • International NGOs (Dempsey, 2007) • Dialogue (Craig, 2007) • Public meetings (Tracy, 2007)

  8. Toward GPT 2.0 • Addressing essential tensions in GPT: • descriptive – normative (validation criteria?) • theoretical – applied (practical impact?) • positioning – universalizing (political stance?) • Right-sizing the scope: • methodology: AIDA, ethnography, narrative inquiry, action research, etc. • site-based & dispersed practices • collective agents? communities of practice? non-human agents? • policies vs. practices (e.g., regulatory agencies)

  9. Theoretical Challenges • Design theory (Aakhus & Jackson): • Can we do without a priori normative ideals? • Design = the technical level of reconstruction? • Practice theory (Vygotsky, Wittgenstein, Garfinkel, Bourdieu, Lave & Wenger, Latour) • Is GPT over-intellectualized? (tacit knowledge, habitus) • Is the logic of practice necessarily opaque to its possessors? Is normative discourse misrecognition? • Poststructuralism (esp. Foucault) • How is GPT related to big-D discourses? (problems ↔ problematization; techniques ↔ governmentality; situated ideals ↔ regimes of truth) • Does GPT imply a theory of agency?

  10. Further Information: http://spot.colorado.edu/~craigr/research.htm

More Related