1 / 23

Shareholder Value versus CO 2

Shareholder Value versus CO 2. Agenda. Emission basics History and sector data Drivers and incentives Industrial Cogeneration Conclusion. CO2-emissions basics. E = MC 2 MC 2 = CO 2 E = CO 2 ( 66 %) 1 kWh = 3.6 MJ An average EU citizen produces 9100 kg/y CO 2

uma
Download Presentation

Shareholder Value versus CO 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Shareholder Value versus CO2

  2. Agenda • Emission basics • History and sector data • Drivers and incentives • Industrial Cogeneration • Conclusion

  3. CO2-emissions basics • E = MC2 • MC2 = CO2 • E = CO2 ( 66 %) • 1 kWh = 3.6 MJ • An average EU citizen produces 9100 kg/y CO2 • 1 GJ of heat produces 62 kg CO2 • 1 kWh ( electrical energy) requires 2.5 kWh of thermal • energy and produces 0.56 kg CO2

  4. CO2-emissions basics

  5. CO2-emissions history Source : Energy in Europe 1997

  6. EU CO2 Sectors Source : Energy in Europe 1997

  7. EU CO2 Sectors Source : Energy in Europe 1997

  8. EU Transport

  9. EU Transport • Positive effects • train push • ? • Negative effects • Increase transportation • E-commerce/ Internet • Congestion's • Alternatives ?

  10. EU Power Gen Source : Energy in Europe 1997

  11. EU Power Gen • Positive effects • Efficiencies are increasing • Switch to gas • Negative effects • Deregulation's • Pressure on nuclear Source : Energy in Europe 1997

  12. EU Domestic&Tertiary

  13. EU Domestic&Tertiary • Positive effects • Awareness • Tremendous untapped • potential • Business opertunity • Negative effects • Deregulation’s • Long term contracts

  14. EU Industry Source : CoGen Europe 1999

  15. EU Industry Source : CoGen Europe 1999

  16. EU Industry Source : CoGen Europe 1999

  17. EU Industry • Positive effects • Awareness • Marketing issue • Tremendous untapped • CHP potential • Negative effects • Deregulation • ROI/IRR • Fierce competition

  18. What is the ultimate driving factor

  19. What does Wall Street demands ? • Increase growth and market share • Increase profitability • Increase the price • Lower the cost • Digitalisation/Automation • Globalisation • Outsourcing of services/assets • Energy

  20. Energy Cost Reduction Optimise energy generation Savings 5-35 % Optimise distribution Optimise consumption

  21. Saving Examples • University of Cologne GE $ 145.000 • Glan Hafren Hospital UK $ 800.000 • Honeywell Emmen NL $ 150.000 • Otrokivice District Heating CZ $ 700.000 • Siklos District Heating HU $ 100.000 • Krakow POL 33 % energy reduction • Martin District Heating SLOV $ 350.000 • Tushino Russia $ 1.100.000 • Kiev Ukraine $ 30.000 ( 1 out 1600 buildings) • Beijing China savings +/- 30 % • Hanvit Bank Korea $ 570.000 • Inland Revenue US $ 100.000 • Paint Shop Mexico $ 80.000

  22. Recent CHP references • 540 MWe CHP Netherlands • 300 MWe CHP Scottland • 200 MWe CHP Czech Rep • 180 MWe CHP Hungary • 150 MWe CHP UK • 120 MWe CHP Poland • 110 MWe CHP Finland • 100 MWe CHP Germany • 100 MWe CHP France • 40 MWe CHP Spain • 25 MWe CHP Belgium

  23. Summary • CO2 reduction is possible and can be implemented in short to • medium terms everywhere • Focus on co-generation (industry and buildings) to • capture the potential and to leverage existing technologies • A positive,substainable financial incentive and legal • framework is necessary to boost the process • NO TIME TO WASTE

More Related