1 / 8

Analysis for the Allow Immediate Creation of Pooled Engagement for CFF (TAR05) Candidate

Analysis for the Allow Immediate Creation of Pooled Engagement for CFF (TAR05) Candidate. POC: G. Shea. TAR05 Overview. Summary Description When tasked with CFF assignments, allow the operator the choice of spinning up a “pooled” missile as the mission is being created. Fleet Benefit

uma
Download Presentation

Analysis for the Allow Immediate Creation of Pooled Engagement for CFF (TAR05) Candidate

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Analysis for the Allow Immediate Creation of Pooled Engagement for CFF (TAR05) Candidate POC: G. Shea

  2. TAR05 Overview • Summary Description • When tasked with CFF assignments, allow the operator the choice of spinning up a “pooled” missile as the mission is being created. • Fleet Benefit • Provides a reduced timeline in the execution of CFF missions. • Fleet Importance: High • CR Summary • Adaptive: 0 • Perfective: 1 • Corrective: 0 • TOTAL: 1

  3. TAR05 Analysis • Technical Description • When tasked with CFF assignments, allow the operator the choice of spinning up a “pooled” missile as the mission is being created. • Effort: Medium • Size: High (rate Low (<100 SLOC), Medium (<500 SLOC) or High (>500 SLOC)) • Complexity: Medium (rate Low (easy changes to implement), Medium (average changes to implement), High (difficult changes to implement)) • External Dependencies: None • Risk: High (rate Low, Medium, or High – see last page for guidance) • Addresses 1 CR Eliminates 0 TTBs/TIP entries

  4. TAR05 Recommendation • Recommendation Implement in v6 Defer for future consideration • Rationale • Captain directed improvement. • Issues • Do we need a mission for the missile to spin it up.

  5. Backup Slides(TAR05)

  6. TAR05 CR Summary

  7. TAR05 – Design Concept • CR 10184 – From the User Workflow review with the Captain. (CR #40), 04.01.01, Call for Fire (CFF) Tasking Execution (EN). Delete U.CFF.12, 13 and S.CFF.12, 13, and their corresponding flows,; add U.CFF.11->UO3.44; U.CFF.01 "System creates the pooled engagement". P3I, Bartlett, TAR. • Add an operator control to allow the operator to select the powering up and aligning of the CFF set-aside missile(s) selected in the CFF tasking while mission creation is being completed. • Addressed in the White Paper

  8. Risk and Effort Assessment Guidance • Low • Candidate is very well defined/understood • No issues are identified • Effort is Low (Size = Low AND Complexity = Low OR Size = Low AND Complexity = Medium OR Size = Medium AND Complexity = Low) • Medium • Candidate is defined/understood • Minor issues are identified • Effort is Medium (Size = Low AND Complexity = High OR Size = Medium AND Complexity = Medium OR Size = High and Complexity = Low) • High • Candidate is not fully defined/understood • Major issues are identified • Effort is High (Size = Medium AND Complexity = High OR Size = High AND Complexity = Medium OR Size = High AND Complexity = High)

More Related