1 / 38

Floods: What We Know, What We Don’t Know, and a Case Study

Floods: What We Know, What We Don’t Know, and a Case Study. Atmospheric-Science Seminar Colin Raymond October 2014. Outline. What We Know (IPCC Report) What We Don’t Know [Yet] (Jain & Lall 2001) Case Study ( Martius et. al. 2013). What We Know. CPT D. MIDAS

ulric-chen
Download Presentation

Floods: What We Know, What We Don’t Know, and a Case Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Floods: What We Know, What We Don’t Know, and a Case Study Atmospheric-Science Seminar Colin Raymond October 2014

  2. Outline • What We Know (IPCC Report) • What We Don’t Know [Yet] (Jain & Lall 2001) • Case Study (Martius et. al. 2013)

  3. What We Know • CPT D. MIDAS • Ability to simulate floods qualitatively depends on ability to predict extreme precip changes • Extremes: circulation probably more important for rarer events • C.C.: Insufficient evidence for attribution or even trends in magnitude – GCMs often disagree --nonstationarity in river dynamics? --size of spring melt floods?

  4. What We Don’t Know [Yet]:Floods & Climate Change • Strong correlations b/w ENSO/PDO indices & Similkameen River annual-max flows (AMF’s) • Is this relationship robust over periods longer than obs. record? If so, what are the implications?

  5. What the Record Says

  6. What the Record Says --Linear predictability of flood maxima a season in advance from ENSO-related indices

  7. ENSO Variability is Concentrated at Certain Frequencies

  8. ENSO Variability is Concentrated at Certain Frequencies ...but there’s longer timescales in there too

  9. ENSO Variability is Concentrated at Certain Frequencies ...but there’s longer timescales in there too Structured Non-Stationarity in Flood Dist’ns?

  10. Non-Stationarity & ‘Snippet Biases’ • we’re likely overcounting extreme ENSO events & thus flood variability • n-s: no short record can be fully representative selon ZC • example (MATLAB) follows

  11. Same Principle Holds for Extremes

  12. Same Principle Holds for Extremes

  13. Conclusions from Jain & Lall • Interannualstationarity in flood potential cannot be assumed even in a constant climate • Flood extremes in WA closely correlated with ENSO over multiple timescales • Good news: using extremes in the current obs. record as guideposts likely means overpreparation

  14. Case Study: 2010 Pakistan Floods http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-11068259

  15. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-10896849

  16. Magnitudes

  17. Related Findings • In the Alps, long N-S upper-level troughs trigger heavy precip via: • creating favorable wind dirs for topographic lift • providing a persistent moisture source • reducing static stability & thus ‘activation energy’ • forcing ascent quasi-geostrophically

  18. Other Known Extreme Factors • ENSO phase – in Pakistan, climatologically higher precip during La Niña • Soil-moisture feedbacks • Deeply saturated air • Warmer temps aloft

  19. Circulation and SSTs H upper-level wave-breaking zone; +PV anomaly Himalayan-foothills jet convergence & lifting monsoon low warm SSTs warm SSTs Somali jet

  20. Low-Level Temperature H cool air (enhanced evap.)

  21. Moisture very dry air very moist air

  22. Methodology • back & forward trajectories to determine contributions of moisture-source regions, using potential-vorticity inversions • simulation of sensitivity of precip to regional evapotranspiration

  23. Potential Vorticity Review http://www.lpc2e.cnrs-orleans.fr/~enriched/images/News/Fullsize/SPIRALE_mimosa.png

  24. Potential Vorticity Review • PV=-g(ζg+f)(∂θ/∂p) http://www.eumetrain.org/data/2/28/Content/Images/pv2.jpg

  25. PV Inversion • Given a distribution of PV in a domain (& some other basic conditions), one can recover the balanced mass & momentum fields that produced it • piecewise technique just divides atmos in layers & independently inverts each • this allows for analysis of the influence of discrete portions of the total PV field on the total flow field

  26. Trajectory Calculations: 2 Approaches • Lagrangian (Martius et. al.): Assumes Δq is cumulative sum of parcel’s E-P along route • ultimate sources of moisture appear less important if intermediate precip & evap occur • Eulerian: Inserts tagged tracers into model and follows them through the water cycle Winschall, Pfahl, Sodemann, and Wernli, 2014. “Comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian Moisture Source Diagnostics — the Flood Event in Eastern Europe in May 2010.” Atm. Chem. Phys. 14, 6605:6619.

  27. Findings Extreme episode #1 #2

  28. Findings Heavy precip assoc. with high PW, low T, low CAPE, deep saturation  unusual set of anomalies

  29. Findings • Dynamics: heavy precip assoc. with high PW, low T, low CAPE, deep saturation (unusual set of anomalies) • LL Circulation: heat low over northern Pakistan helped draw in moisture that would usually be near Bangladesh • UL Circulation: as in similar Alpine events, forcing organized & intensified precip, and appeared to initiate it in the 2nd episode • Moisture transport: 78% of moisture in 1st extreme episode originated in Pakistan or SW Asia, vs. 34% in 2nd episode; contribution of Indian subcontinent & bays incr. from 18% to 56% (but note Lagrangiandef’n difficulties)

  30. Findings Cont. • Coupling of precip & ET critical (due to local sourcing of moisture), confirmed by ET sensitivity analysis • 80% lower precip in simulation when sfc ET over Pakistan was eliminated, despite just a 15-18% decrease in PW • High soil moisture meant higher availability for evap. than normal • ECMWF predictions & obs agreed remarkably well in both location & magnitude similar dynamics as floods along Front Range of western US (Grumm and Du, 2013)

  31. Discussion Point: What Was the Relative Importance of Human Actions? Syvitski, James, and Robert Brakenridge, 2013. “Causation and Avoidance of Catastrophic Flooding along the Indus River, Pakistan.” GSA Today. 23 (1), 4-10.

  32. What Can This Tell Us About Effects Under Climate Change? • Depends partly on changes in frequency of blocking highs (c.f. heat-wave discussion) • Displacement of moisture vs. overall moisture increase – we think we know extreme precip will increase

  33. Temperature: Lahore vs. Moscow

More Related