1 / 39

USFS National Minimum Protocol for Monitoring Solitude

USFS National Minimum Protocol for Monitoring Solitude. June 5, 2014 Dr. Troy E. Hall WIMST Oregon State University t roy.hall@oregonstate.edu. Overview of the webinar. Photo: Troy Hall. Why monitor opportunities for solitude Element 5 of the Challenge The national minimum protocol Q&A.

ull
Download Presentation

USFS National Minimum Protocol for Monitoring Solitude

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. USFS National Minimum Protocol for Monitoring Solitude June 5, 2014 Dr. Troy E. Hall WIMST Oregon State University troy.hall@oregonstate.edu

  2. Overview of the webinar Photo: Troy Hall • Why monitor opportunities for solitude • Element 5 of the Challenge • The national minimum protocol • Q&A

  3. Why monitor solitude Photo: cfot.ca Wilderness Act: “outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive & unconfined type of recreation”

  4. Wilderness & Solitude Photo: Troy Hall Wilderness character The only land designation where solitude is mandated

  5. Wilderness & Solitude Troy Hall Tom Iraci Opportunities may be compromised

  6. 10YWSC Photo: Wilderness.net All wildernesses managed to a minimum stewardship level by 2014 10 elements, each worth 10 points Target: 60 points

  7. Element 5 Photo: Tom Kaffine “This wilderness has adequate direction, monitoring, and management actions to protect opportunities for solitude or primitive and unconfined recreation.”

  8. Scoring for Element 5

  9. Why create a national protocol? Photos: Brad Johnson Challenge making progress on Element 5 Inherent difficulties monitoring for solitude

  10. Assumptions Photo: Wilderness Watch This does not address primitive & unconfined recreation “number of encounters” is the most appropriate indicator for solitude This is a minimum protocol

  11. Scoring with the minimum protocol Photo: Maria Burke 4 points = data complete (collected & summarized) for each monitoring area Data ≤ 10 years old (recommend 5 years) Indicators and standards need not be formally presented in planning documents

  12. What’s in the protocol? Photo: Troy Hall Photo: Marty Almquist Establishing use zones Selecting monitoring areas Scheduling data collection Collecting encounter data Basic analysis

  13. Step 1: Pre-work NPS photo • Existing indicators & standards? • E.g., “80% of the time a visitor will encounter 10 or fewer groups per day” • E.g., “There shall be no more than one campsite visible or audible from any campsite, or closer than 500 feet in open country” • Previous data?

  14. Step 1: Pre-work Existing WROS zones?

  15. Step 1: Pre-work Photo: Jay Robinson • Establishing Use Zones • 2-4 categories • High, moderate, low • Most wilderness is “low use” -- <10% of all visitation • Monitoring is not required in low use zones

  16. Step 1: Pre-work Photo: Steve Boutcher Photo: wilderness.net • Establishing Use Zones • Mapping considerations • Reasonable size • Logical traffic patterns • Other management concerns

  17. Step 2: Select monitoring areas Photo: Troy Hall What is a monitoring area?

  18. Step 2: Select monitoring areas • What “type” of wilderness? • Type 1: • “High” or “Medium” use wildernesses with > 75 miles of travel corridor • “Low” use wildernesses with > 100 miles of travel corridor. • Type 2: • “High” or “Medium” use wildernesses with 1-75 miles of travel corridor • “Low” use wildernesses with 1-100 miles of travel corridor. • Type 3: • Wildernesses with no miles of travel corridor.

  19. Step 2: Select monitoring areas Photo: G. Wuerthner • How many monitoring areas? • Type I wildernesses: • 2 locations within each use class, except low use • Type II wildernesses: • 1 location within each use class, except low use

  20. Step 2: Select monitoring areas NPS Photo Photo: Troy Hall • How do you choose? • Representative area? • Canary in the coal mine? • Known problem areas?

  21. The decision about which monitoring areas to choose is a judgment call. Therefore, each wilderness could have a different approach to selecting monitoring areas. Photo: Wilderness.net

  22. Step 3: Sampling Photo: Mike Carr, Gila NF • Sampling • 5 weekdays & 5 weekend/holiday for each monitoring area, during high use season • 4 hours per monitoring session – daytime hours for traveling encounters • Convenience vs. random sampling

  23. Step 4: Collect data Photo: wilderness.net Photo: Chris Barns • Traveling encounters • people you see and/or hear while traveling in the monitoring area

  24. Step 4: Collect data Photo: Cathy Curby Photo: Troy Hall • Camp encounters • number of other camping groups visible or audible from each occupied campsite

  25. Step 4: Collect data • What’s an encounter? • Inside or outside wilderness? • On/off trail? • Close vs. distant? • Multiple sightings?

  26. Step 4: Collect data

  27. Step 4: Collect data

  28. Step 4: Collect data Photo: Bob Wick • Supplementary information • Visitor characteristics • Traffic counters

  29. Step 5: Data Management

  30. Step 5: Data Management

  31. Step 5: Data Management

  32. Step 5: Data Management

  33. Available materials Photo: Brad Eells • Protocol • Definitions and procedures • Guidance for establishing use zones • “checksheet” • FAQs

  34. Available materials • See also wilderness.net • Toolboxes  visitor use management  monitoring

  35. FAQs Photo: A. Halford Why not use trail counters or permits? What if we have an existing protocol? What can Type III wildernesses do?

  36. FAQs Photo: Michael Lusk How does this fit with Wilderness Character Monitoring and wilderness performance measure?

  37. Important caveats Photo: wilderness.net Photo: Cathy Curby Protocol works for most but not all wildernesses Not adequate for monitoring trends

  38. A tip of the hat to… • TJ Broom • WIMST, especially • ToganCapozza • Kimberly Schlenker • Chad Grossenberg • Tim Eling • Steve Boutcher

  39. Questions & Discussion • Contact Troy: • troy.hall@oregonstate.edu • Contact Steve: • sboutcher@fs.fed.us

More Related