1 / 20

巧婦難為無米之炊 One can't make bricks without straw

巧婦難為無米之炊 One can't make bricks without straw. 蔡佳展 Eddie Tsai EBSCO Publishing 2009/11/12. 大綱. 圖書館預算的現況與走勢 紙本 , 電子期刊 , 資料庫的角色 電子資源的重複收錄情況 各種不同的出版物比對系統 (TCS) 的限制 檢驗各文獻庫的學術收錄內容 Impact factors in JCR Eigenfactors 商家的終極目標 結論.

ulf
Download Presentation

巧婦難為無米之炊 One can't make bricks without straw

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 巧婦難為無米之炊One can't make bricks without straw 蔡佳展 Eddie Tsai EBSCO Publishing 2009/11/12

  2. 大綱 • 圖書館預算的現況與走勢 • 紙本,電子期刊,資料庫的角色 • 電子資源的重複收錄情況 • 各種不同的出版物比對系統(TCS)的限制 • 檢驗各文獻庫的學術收錄內容 • Impact factors in JCR • Eigenfactors • 商家的終極目標 • 結論

  3. "A library is not a luxury but one of the necessities of life.“-- Henry Ward Beecher (Liberal US Congregational minister, 1813-1887)

  4. 8 資料來源: Library Journal, BUDGET SURVEY 2009 (美國公共圖書館)

  5. 08年美國大學捐贈(endowments)減少23% 哈佛大學:減少30% (HCL的預算50%來自捐贈) 来源: ACRL 2009 Strategic Thinking Guide for Academic Librarians in the new Economy, Mar,2009 史丹佛大學:減少30%捐贈 来源: Stanford University Libraries Cut 15%, Lose Staff, Hours, Materials... Library Journal, June,2009 “It may not be uncommon for library and consortia budgets to decline by double digits year over year.” 圖書館與聯盟預算“成長”每年以兩位數的速度減少,並不異常.

  6. 圖書館預算減少的影響 • 紐約市計畫大幅削減圖書館預算 • 市議會:圖書館削減17%預算的提議 • 紐約公共圖書館從去年年底取消了星期天的開館服務 • 09年OhioLINK, $7.4m -> $6.44m • Ohio Library Council取消今年10月年會(7/20/09)

  7. 圖書館預算減少的影響 • University of Washington 8% ($2.45 million) to 12% ($3.7 million)。 • MIT Libraries(1.4百萬) 、UCLA、Tennessee and Florida... • 他們凍結空缺的職位、刪減出差或其他支出、刪減書刊購置經費。 • University of Massachusetts Dartmouth圖資科技副校長退休後，其職位亦將遇缺不補。 (資料來源：ARL Budget Roundup: Large Academic Libraries Face Cuts in Collections, Staff, Hours--Library Journal April 30, 2009)

  8. 圖書館預算減少的影響 • 美國圖書館協會(ALA) • 減少人力支出 • 決派三人小組與Obama會面,直接反應 資料來源： 1. ALA Conference 2009: Budget Crisis, Privacy, Electronic Participation Library Journal April, 2009 2. ALA 2009: Council, Executive Board address variety of issues; Alire stresses advocacy, Library Journal July 21, 2009

  9. As confirmed by an ALA study, when the economy is DOWN, library use is UP. Unfortunately, at the same time, tight budgets are closing library doors and reducing access when it is needed most. – Gerding, 2005 ALA研究指出,當經濟下滑時,圖書館使用率會上升.不巧的同時,此刻最需要圖書館服務,但預算的緊縮導致圖書館減少開放時間(由於人員縮編),降低使用途徑.

  10. 紙本/電子期刊/集成商資料庫的角色 核心館藏: 紙本/電子期刊 拓展館藏:集成商資料庫(補強) 紙與電子文獻比重?

  11. How much value do the major aggregated databasesbring to the collection of a large research library? (Stanford University’s collection is analyzed in this case) Active, full-text, peer-reviewed journals in EBSCO Databases that are NOTavailable as active FT in 資料庫廠商A Databases or in the Stanford e-journal collection Active, full-text, peer-reviewed journals in 資料庫廠商A Databases that are NOT available as active FT in EBSCO Databases or in the Stanford e-journal collection 2,244 459 Active, full-text, peer-reviewed journals in EBSCO Databases that are NOTavailable as active FT in 資料庫廠商B Databases or in the Stanford e-journal collection Active, full-text, peer-reviewed journals in 資料庫廠商B Databases that are NOTavailable as active FT in EBSCO Databases or in the Stanford e-journal collection 2,323 236 EBSCO Databases = Academic Search, Business Source & CMMC

  12. 集成商資料庫之間的重複收錄

  13. 使用出版物比對系統(TCS)注意事項 • ACCESS/EXCEL (non-ISSN刊物) • CUFTs, GoldMine, JISC, Serials Solutions, A-to-Z,… --區分持續發行(active) vs. 非自然斷刊(unnaturally halted) 範例: Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Marketing --區分嚴重時滯(severely embargoed)與無時滯(no embargo) 範例: JSTOR --無法允許非學術內容的刪選(filter)：如專家評審(PR)與WOS的選項 --僅計算現有內容，忽略即將新增收錄內容

  14. 檢驗各文獻庫的學術收錄內容 • 專家評審(peer-reviewed) • 學科期刊排名(如旅遊餐飲, 管理等) • 不定期:各教授獨立發表學科期刊排名 • 定期: JCR, Eigenfactors, etc • 比較的範例

  15. 行銷學期刊排名* * Michael Jay Polonsky and Paul Whitelaw, Marketing Education Review, Volume 16, Number 3 (Fall 2006).

  16. 春天时,想想冬天的时候! *持續作年度各電子期刊出版社及資料庫商的質量比分析 * 三種參數: S/P, A/P and F/P *一般準則:單價高,使用率低,非全文資源為優先刪減

  17. Source: EIS, Aug. 19, 2009

  18. 商家的終極目標?

  19. 結論 • 預算走勢趨減,甚至加速下滑 • 文獻使用的質量比 • 零重複率(zero duplication) • 使用出版物比對系統(TCS)須注意事項 • 未雨幬謀 • 換位思考(同理心)

More Related