1 / 21

Using FIA Data to Strategically Assess Fire Hazard and Management Opportunities in Montana and New Mexico Charles E. K

Using FIA Data to Strategically Assess Fire Hazard and Management Opportunities in Montana and New Mexico Charles E. Keegan III The University of Montana. Cooperators. The University of Montana School of Forestry BBER PNW Research Station RM Research Station (IWFIA). OBJECTIVES.

tyrell
Download Presentation

Using FIA Data to Strategically Assess Fire Hazard and Management Opportunities in Montana and New Mexico Charles E. K

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Using FIA Data to Strategically Assess Fire Hazard and Management Opportunities in Montana and New Mexico • Charles E. Keegan III • The University of Montana

  2. Cooperators • The University of Montana • School of Forestry • BBER • PNW Research Station • RM Research Station (IWFIA)

  3. OBJECTIVES • Describe current forest conditions in Montana and New Mexico • Assess existing crown fire hazard • Evaluate effectiveness of fire hazard reduction treatments • Estimate treatment costs and revenue • Evaluate future treatment effectiveness

  4. METHODS FLOW CHART Current Forest/Stand Conditions (1) FVS FFE FIA Data Format Edit Current Fire Hazard (2) High & Mod. Hazard Stands FVS 30-yr Projection FFE Leave-Tree Stand Tables Apply Alternative Rx’s Cut-Tree Stand Tables Cost, Products & Value Model FFE Costs (Revenues)/Ac by Prescription (4) Fire Hazard 30 Years Post-Treatment (5) Fire Hazard Immediately Post-Treatment (3)

  5. Current Forest Conditions • Forest types & acreages • Tree density • Vertical stand structure • Species composition

  6. Forest Types of Greatest Concern • Ponderosa pine • Douglas-fir • Dry lower-elevation mixed-conifer Because: near persons & property, ecological changes due to fire suppression activities and past logging practices

  7. Ecological Problems • Increased density • Continuous structure of ladder fuels • Changed species composition

  8. Fire Hazard for PP, DF, & DLMC Forests Total for forest types = 9.3 million acres

  9. Proposed Treatments • Thin-from-below • focus on removing small trees • cut only trees dbh < 9” • burn/dispose of slash • Comprehensive • focus on future stand’s ecological condition • thin-from-below & remove slash • stand improvement cut • selection cut in mid- & upper canopy

  10. Comprehensive Treatment Product Removals • Sawlogs & Studlogs • 1000 cubic feet per acre • 9 - 20+” dbh Pulpwood • 300 cubic feet per acre • 5 - 8” dbh

  11. Crowning Index and Revenue Montana-Statewide

  12. Net revenue for comprehensive treatment of PP, DF, & DLMC - 1997-1999 markets

  13. New Mexico Forestland by Fire Hazard Total forestland = 16.7 million acres

  14. Fire Hazard for PP & DMC Forests in New Mexico Total for forest types = 4.0 million acres

  15. Average Crowning Index and Revenue Per Acre Across New Mexico

  16. Contacting Us • Phone: • (406) 243-5113 • Email: • charles.keegan@business.umt.edu todd.morgan@business.umt.edu • Internet: • www.BBER.umt.edu

More Related