Section 6 2 when bad things happen to good people
Sponsored Links
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
1 / 15

Section 6.2 When Bad Things Happen to Good People PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Section 6.2 When Bad Things Happen to Good People. God as Troublemaker. Thought Experiment: Rowe’s Fawn. Suppose that in a distant forest, lightning strikes a tree, causes a forest fire, and burns a fawn to death.

Download Presentation

Section 6.2 When Bad Things Happen to Good People

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Section 6.2When Bad Things Happento Good People

God as Troublemaker

Thought Experiment: Rowe’s Fawn

  • Suppose that in a distant forest, lightning strikes a tree, causes a forest fire, and burns a fawn to death.

  • How can an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good being allow such unnecessary suffering?

The Argument from Evil

  • There is unnecessary evil in the world.

  • If there were an all-powerful, all-knowing, all-good being, there would be no unnecessary evil in the world.

  • Therefore, there is no all-powerful, all-knowing, all-good being.


  • A theory that seeks to justify belief in God in the face of all the evil in the world is known as a theodicy.

  • Many different theodicies have been proposed over the years, and all seek to defend the claim that the evil in the world is necessary.

The Ontological Defense

  • According to the ontological defense, goodness cannot exist without evil, so it’s impossible for God to make a good world that didn’t contain evil.

  • Objection: This would be true if goodness were a type of evil, but it isn’t.

  • Just as redness can exist without other colors, goodness can exist without evil.

The Knowledge Defense

  • According to the knowledge defense, evil must exist in order for us to know good.

  • Objections:

    • It’s possible to know evil without experiencing it, for example, Adam and Eve.

    • There is far more evil in the world than is necessary to give us a knowledge of it.

Thought Probe:Adam and Eve

  • The forbidden apple contained the knowledge of right and wrong. So before Adam and Eve ate the apple, they couldn’t have known it was wrong to eat the apple.

  • But if they didn’t know it was wrong, was it right to punish them?

  • Even if it was right to punish them, was it right to punish all of mankind throughout eternity for what they did?

The Free Will Defense

  • According to the free will defense, evil is necessary for free will.

  • Objections:

    • It’s possible to have free will and not choose evil, e. g., God, Mary, Jesus.

    • The evil caused by humans (moral evil) is only one sort of evil. There is also evil caused by nature (natural evil).

Thought Probe:Wrath of God

  • One of the most poignant examples of natural evil is the tsunami (tidal wave) that occurred in the Indian Ocean on December 26, 2004, killing more than 200,000 people.

  • Some see this as evidence of God’s wrath.

  • Would an all-good, all-knowing, all-powerful being allow 200,000 of his children to die in such a manner just to express his anger or teach people a lesson?

Thought Probe: Is There Free Will in Heaven?

  • Heaven is supposed to be a place where there is no sin and thus no evil.

  • But according to the free will defense, there cannot be free will without evil.

  • So can there be free will in heaven?

The Ideal Humanity Defense

  • According to the ideal-humanity defense, evil is necessary to improve the human race.

  • Objections:

    • There is little evidence that humanity has improved.

    • This conflicts with the principle that humans are infinitely valuable and thus should not be used as means to an end.

The Soul-Building Defense

  • According to the soul-building defense, evil is necessary to make us better people.

  • Objections:

    • Suffering often does not necessarily improve one’s character.

    • Forcing others to do something against their will, even if it will benefit them, is a violation of their rights.

    • There is much more evil than necessary.

Thought Probe: Karma

  • According to the law of Karma, whatever evil we do in this life will come back to us in another life.

  • Hindus claim that Karma can explain natural evil—those who suffer evil at the hands of nature had it coming to them.

  • Is this a better solution to the problem of evil than those offered by Christians?

The Finite God Defense

  • According to the finite God defense, evil exists because God lacks one of the traditional properties associated with Him such as being all-powerful or all-good.

  • Objections:

    • If God is not all-powerful, He cannot perform miracles.

    • If God is not all-powerful, He may not be worthy of worship.

Thought Probe: God’s Goodness

  • American revolutionary patriot Thomas Paine claims that the Bible is so filled with cruel and vindictive acts, “it would be more consistent that we called it the word of a demon rather than the Word of God.”

  • Is Paine’s assessment a fair one?

  • Login