1 / 19

Project 3B: PreK-3 rd Grade Systems Investment Fund, Round 2 May 12 & 20, 2014

Project 3B: PreK-3 rd Grade Systems Investment Fund, Round 2 May 12 & 20, 2014 Matthew Gulbranson, Kerri Patterson, Paméla Raya-Carlton, Allison Shields. Overview of Presentation Rationale and overview for P3B projects Round Two of RFP Process

tynice
Download Presentation

Project 3B: PreK-3 rd Grade Systems Investment Fund, Round 2 May 12 & 20, 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Project 3B: PreK-3rd Grade Systems Investment Fund, Round 2 May 12& 20, 2014 Matthew Gulbranson, Kerri Patterson, Paméla Raya-Carlton, Allison Shields

  2. Overview of Presentation • Rationale and overview for P3B projects • Round Two of RFP Process • Overview of online system for letter of inquiry (LOI) and request for proposals (RFP) • Overview of budgeting • Overview of target setting • Resources to support proposal development • Burning questions

  3. Project 3B Investment Fund Overview • This project will invest in proposals submitted by districts to implement components of their PreK-3rd grade plan as developed through Project 3A. • Aligned with state, regional and local efforts, the region-wide system will: • Champion the PreK-3rd vision as a means for addressing educational equity • Facilitate partnerships • Coordinate professional development across districts and early learning • Develop data feedback loops that provide information to early learning providers and the K-12 system • Share innovative teaching approaches and best practices • Align with P-3 Framework • Leverage and make actionable P3A district plan

  4. Project 3B Investment Fund Overview • Funding: P3 Investment Fund Total: $3,913,822 • Round 1 (2013-2014) up to 30% $ 1,174,147 • Round 2 (2014-2015) up to 40% $ 1,565,529 • Round 3 (2015-2016) up to 30% $ 1,174,146 • Partnerships: Multiple districts may serve as co-applicants with 1 lead applicant.

  5. Project 8 Investment Fund Timeline

  6. Round 2 P3B Criteria • Requirements: • Evidence of education association support/involvement with signatures of the local superintendent and local association president(s). • Project focuses on High-Need Schools. • 3. Project implementation begins or continues during 2014-15 school year

  7. Round 2 P3B Criteria • Priorities: • 4. Personalized and culturally relevant approaches ensure a culture of high-learning expectations designed specifically to meet the needs of students of color, students who are English Language Learners (ELL), and students receiving Special Education services. • 5. Concrete examples/evidence describe connections to a broad systems-level plan to expand opportunities and access for student subgroups to decrease racial inequity. • 6. Proposal actions are projected to improve the instructional core and build leadership capacity, supported with data.

  8. Round 2 P3B Criteria • Priorities: • Alignment with the district’s current priorities and PreK-3 system-building action plan (project 3A), based on the Framework for Planning, Implementing, and Evaluating PreK-3rd Grade Approaches. • When appropriate, there is evidence of involvement of, resource sharing with, and support for communities of color and other groups representing students the strategy intends to serve. • Well-defined project targets and progress-monitoring measures are provided reflecting evidence of student performance and reduction of achievement gaps.

  9. Round 2 P3B Criteria • Priorities: • Support RTT assurances and commitments. • Articulate strong project leadership and accountability measures at all levels of the system. • Project identifies strong return on investment for project funds and impacts long-term student success.

  10. Overview of LOI and RFP RFP URL http://roadmapracetothetop.org/project-3b-investment-fund-for-prek-3rd-grade-strategies-and-systems/

  11. Tips for Online LOI and RFP • Prepare all documents in MS Word prior to submission • Designate a point person to submit final letter of intent and proposal • Do not use back and forth buttons when entering proposal • Additional tables, figures and infographics can be loaded into the system as separate documents

  12. Overview of Budget Process

  13. Tips for Budget Development • Start your budget early • Collaborate with your Business Office to draft and revise project budgets • Continuing projects will require an original budget with expenditure info from your business office • Continuing projects will need to calculate the estimated balance at the end of the year

  14. Tips for Budget Development • Make sure you put enough detail about how you calculate. Narrative not as important in this form (for example: .50 FTE salary 60,000 Sept-Aug 2014-15) • Identify whether you will need to submit bids for service or document justification of sole source documents • Have someone review your budget before submitting the proposal

  15. Tips for Target Setting: What Data? • Available on RTT website: District-specific data by subgroups • May Require High-Needs school-level data • Work with district Assessment Office • Identify Baseline Year Performance in 2010-11

  16. Tips for Target Setting: State Assessment Goal Areas and Performance Measures • Considering the transition from MSP to Smarter Balanced: the Road Map Project Data Advisors Group has began discussions of target-settingand reporting • Possible 25% drop in student performance with Smarter Balanced • Possible strategy: Can use 25% as a possible basis for adjusting district targets. • Possible strategy: Can use state NAEP scores • Discuss with your P1 and P8 district leads who have done this already for round 2.

  17. Tips for Target Setting: Other Goal Areas and Performance Measures • Data that are not based on state assessment • Consider baseline and actual performance data • Consider this condition for an effective target: • That the target is achievable – with some stretch – by those expected to achieve it.

  18. Questions and Answers

  19. Contact Information

More Related