1 / 22

# Integrating Standards of Mathematical Practice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Integrating Standards of Mathematical Practice. Bureau of Indian Education. The How and the What.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Integrating Standards of Mathematical Practice' - tyler

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

### Integrating Standards of Mathematical Practice

Bureau of Indian Education

The Standards of Mathematical Practice describe varieties of expertise that mathematics educators at all levels should seek to develop in their students. These practices rest on important “processes and proficiencies” with longstanding importance in mathematics education.

• They are NOT a rewrite of state standards

• They are set to global standards

• Most states were 1-2 years behind

• Common Core is far more rigorous

What do standards of mathematical practice have in common with Native American pedagogy?

Ojibwe Pedagogy

Standards of Math Practice

• Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them

• Reason abstractly and quantitatively

• Construct viable arguments and critique reasoning

• Model with mathematics

• Use appropriate tools strategically

• Attend to precision

• Look for and make use of structure

• Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning

www.corestandards.org

• Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them

• Reason abstractly and quantitatively

• Construct viable arguments and critique reasoning

• Model with mathematics

• Use appropriate tools strategically

• Attend to precision

• Look for and make use of structure

• Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning

www.corestandards.org

• Children notice similarities in problems

• Children create “shortcuts”

• Children understand place value

• Children use and understand invented algorithms for larger numbers

• Children don’t rely on teacher for solution

• Predictions to problems are reasonable

• Children recall information correctly

• Children can repeat question

• Children don’t give up easily

• Children ask for harder problems

• Children can explain what numbers mean

• Children can write equations to problems

• Children can match numbers and objects

• Children understand operations

• Children use inverse operations

• Children use multiple solution strategies

• Children can prove their answer

• Children can disprove other answers

• Children can identify counterexamples

• Children use mathematical vocabulary

• Children make accurate predictions

• Children can explain another’s solution

Model with mathematics others

• Children make statements such as, “that’s like…” or “hey we did this before!”

• Children can choose an operation that matches a problem

• Children can connect formal and informal notation

• Children can create a story problem

• Children use many manipulatives

• Children frequently draw math pictures

• Children have math journals

• Children can explain a solution by showing what the did with manipulatives or drawings

• Children use and understand metric and standard rulers

Attend to precision others

• Children can use own words to define math concepts

• Children use math vocabulary to describe a solution

• Children are often asked to explain their solutions to class

• Teachers commonly rephrase thinking

• Teachers create many opportunities for children to share thinking

• Children understand inverse and relative operations

• Children use math facts to derive solutions

• Children notice numerical relationships

• Children use base-10 knowledge

School Data others

27% proficient in 2010 others

90% proficient in 2011