1 / 38

Dephasing and noise in weakly-coupled Bose-Einstein condensates Amichay Vardi

Dephasing and noise in weakly-coupled Bose-Einstein condensates Amichay Vardi. Y. Khodorkovsky, G. Kurizki, and AV PRL 100, 220403 (2008), e-print arXiv:0805.1832 Erez Boukobza, Maya Chuchem, Doron Cohen, and AV PRL, in press (2009), e-print arXiv:0812.1204 I. Tikhonenkov and AV

tyanne
Download Presentation

Dephasing and noise in weakly-coupled Bose-Einstein condensates Amichay Vardi

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dephasing and noise in weakly-coupled Bose-Einstein condensatesAmichay Vardi Y. Khodorkovsky, G. Kurizki, and AV PRL 100, 220403 (2008), e-print arXiv:0805.1832 Erez Boukobza, Maya Chuchem, Doron Cohen, and AV PRL, in press (2009), e-print arXiv:0812.1204 I. Tikhonenkov and AV PRL, submitted, e-print arXiv:0904.2121

  2. Andrews et. al., Science 275, 637 (1997) = N1 + N2 Fringe visibility is proportional to SP coherence Matter-wave interference

  3. x d z y Freely expanding condensates

  4. Population difference: Equal populations: Well defined relative-phase Coherent preparation

  5. Fock preparation Population difference: N1 - N2 Undefined relative phase between the two BECs Does the Fock preparation give interference fringes ?

  6. Fock states are superpositions of coherent states: Any single-shot interferometric measurement constitutes a single phase-projection . Each shot gives fringes with random phase: Fringes in the Fock preparation While the multi-shot density averages out to:

  7. Coherent splitting of a BEC T. Schumm et al., Nature Physics 1, 57 (2005)

  8. Coherent splitting of a BEC The mere existence of interference patterns does not indicate Initial SP coherence - need to verify reproducible fringe position. T. Schumm et al., Nature Physics 1, 57 (2005)

  9. Outline • Assume a coherent preparation. • Interactions cause ‘Phase-Diffusion’. How long will SP coherence survive ? • PD between weakly-coupled BECs - ‘Phase Locking’. • Control of PD by noise. • Sub shot-noise interferometry and PD between atoms and molecules.

  10. Model: a bosonic Josephson junction

  11. Hence coherence is characterized by the length of the Bloch vector restricted to be inside the sphere . Lz  Fringe Visibility: Lx Ly Total number conservation

  12. SU(2) coherent states: Coherent = classical states Gross-Pitaevskii classical (mean-field) energy functional with  :

  13. Interaction regimes Rabi regime Weak interaction, linear (perturbed) Lx eigenstates Josephson regime Intermediate strong interaction Nonlinear ‘islands’ in a linear ‘sea’ Separated by ‘figure-8’ separatrix Fock regime Strong interaction, nonlinear ‘sea’ area less than the Planck cell (perturbed) Lz eigenstates

  14. Classical dynamicsu>2 ‘self trapping’A. Smerzi et al., PRL 79, 4750 (1997).M. Albeiz et al., PRL 95, 010402 (2005).

  15. For and Ut Phase ‘diffusion’ in the Fock regime • Coherent state preparation: binomial superposition of Fock states • Evolve with J=0 , U ≠ 0, .

  16. VB td / trev VA First phase diffusion experiment M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Haensch., and I. Bloch, Nature 419, 51 (2002).

  17. Slow phase-diffusion as a probe of number-squeezingG.-B. Jo et Al., PRL 98, 030407 (2007)

  18. ‘Phase locking’ S. Hofferberth, I. Lesanovsky, B. Fischer, T. Schumm, and J. Schmiedmayer, Nature 449, 324 (2007) u ≈ 5 u ≈ 100 u ≈ 300 u ≈ ∞ N ~ 1000

  19.   N=1000 u=104 u=103 u=102 u=10 Phase-diffusion between weakly coupled condensates E. Boukobza, M. Chuchem, D. Cohen, and AV, PRL, in press (2009). Phase locking in the Josephson regime is phase-sensitive :

  20. Planck cell: Low energy ‘sea’ levels Separatrix levels High energy degenerate ‘island’ Um2levels Semiclassical quantization ‘islands’ separatrix ‘sea’

  21. Semiclassical interpretation

  22. How good is semiclassics ? n=1000 u=1000

  23. Linearization about Correlation time of Phase-diffusion

  24. Quantum Zeno control of phase-diffusion Y. Khodorkovsky, G. Kurizki, and AV, PRL 100, 220403 (2008) • Long correlation times: tcfor phase diffusion in BEC is of order ms • Slow down phase diffusion by frequent measurements / noise. • Since phase diffusion is along the Lx axis, noise has to project onto onto Lx (measure odd-even population imbalance - quasimomentum). • Hence site indiscriminate noise such as stochastic modulation of the barrier height.

  25. For t«tc=,SP coherence decays quadratically QZE reminder Frequent projective measurements of Lx (g1,2(1)) at intervals: SP dephasing slows down as t  0 L. A. Khalfin, JETP Lett. 8, 65 (1968). B. Misra and E. C. G. Sudarshan, J. Math. Phys. Sci. 18, 756 (1977).

  26. QZE control of phase-diffusion QZE limit: Uncorrelated, Markovian noise: Quantum kinetic master equation: Linearization of the master equation gives the QZE result:

  27. Bose enhancement of QZE Extended phase-diffusion time, depends linearly on N: As opposed to log(N) (or N1/2)decoherence-free diffusion time:

  28. N=300 N=150 N=100 N=100 N=400 N=200 N=100 N=100 N=100 N=200 N=400 Preparation with noise numerical (lines) vs. analytic (symbols) Rabi: Josephson:

  29. Noiseless dynamics Macroscopic ‘cat’ state Initial coherent state Site-localized noise z=0.05J Site-indiscriminate noise x=J Comparison with local noise N = 30 u = 2 t = 2.4 J

  30.  E  Em 2Ea 2Ea   Em Optical coupling Feshbach resonance Atom-molecule dephasing in a sub-shot-noise SU(1,1) matter-wave interferometer Undepleted pump:

  31. Casimir operator: Fock states: SU(1,1) k - Bargmann index m = 0,1,2,…

  32. } Kz  Kx Ky Two-atom coherent states

  33. Kz Kz (d) (c) (b) (b),(c) Ky Ky (d) (a) (a) Kx Kx Atom-molecule interferometer

  34. Heisenberg-limited precision

  35. For sinh  >> 1 sin(ut) ~ ut sinh~ 2n Introduce interactions - dephasing

  36. Time domain Frequency domain Fringe visibility Kz (d) (b),(c) (a) Ky Kx

  37. Maya Chuchem MSc, BGU Doron Cohen BGU Erez Boukobza Postdoc, BGU Yuri Khodorkovsky MSc BGU  WIS Gershon Kurizki Weizmann Institute Co-Authors Amichay Vardi BGU Igor Tikhonenkov Research Fellow, BGU

  38. Conclusions • Phase diffusion between weakly-coupled Bose condensates (Josephson regime) is phase-sensitive. • It has a long (~1-10ms) correlation time. • Thus, it may be slowed down by frequent (projective) or continuous measurement of the primitive quasi-momentum. • The obtained QZE is Bose stimulated due to the transition from log(N)- to N-dependent characteristic diffusion times. • In atom-molecule systems, the inherent phase-squeezing may be use to do interferometry below the standard quantum limit. • But, since it comes at the price of number-stretching, atom-molecule phase diffusion time is ~1/N.

More Related