Flavor
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 53

Flavor , Charm , CP Related Physics PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 77 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Flavor , Charm , CP Related Physics. Hai-Yang Cheng Academia Sinica, Taipei. PASCOS, Taipei November 22, 2013. Outline: Quark and lepton mixing matrices Baryonic B decays Direct CP violation in D decays

Download Presentation

Flavor , Charm , CP Related Physics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Flavor charm cp related physics

Flavor, Charm, CP Related Physics

Hai-Yang Cheng

Academia Sinica, Taipei

PASCOS, Taipei

November 22, 2013


Flavor charm cp related physics

Outline:

  • Quark and lepton mixing matrices

  • Baryonic B decays

  • Direct CP violation in D decays

  • Direct CP violation in B decays

See the talk of Rodrigues (11/21)


Flavor charm cp related physics

Quark & lepton mixing matrices


Flavor charm cp related physics

CP Violation in Standard Model

VCKM is the only source of CPV in flavor-changing process in the SM. Only charged current interactions can change flavor

Kobayashi & Maskawa (’72) pointed out that one needs at least six quarks in order to accommodate CPV in SM with one Higgs doublet

1>>1>>2 >>3

Physics is independent of a particular parameterization of CKM matrix, but VKM has some disadvantages :

  • Determination of 2 & 3 is not very accurate

  • Some elements have comparable real & imaginary parts

4


Flavor charm cp related physics

Maiani (’77)

advocated by PDG (’86) as a standard parametrization.

However, the coefficient of the imaginary part of Vcb and Vts is O(10-2) rather than O(10-3) as s23  10-2

In 1984 Ling-Lie Chau and Wai-Yee Keung proposed a new parametrization

1>>12>>23 >>13

s13 ~ 10-3

The same as VMaiani except for the phases of t & b quarks. The imaginary part is O(10-3). This new CKM(Chau-Keung-Maiani) matrix is adapted by PDG as a standard parametrization since 1988.


Flavor charm cp related physics

Some simplified parametrizations

  • Wolfenstein (’83) used Vcb=0.04  A2,   0.22

Mixing matrix is expressed in terms of , A ~ 0.8,  and . Imaginary part = A3 10-3. However, this matrix is valid only up to 3

  • Motivated by the boomerang approach of Frampton & He (’10), Qin

    & Ma have proposed a different parametrization (’10)

Wolfenstein parameters A, ,  QM parameters f, h, 

6


Flavor charm cp related physics

The original Wolfenstein parametrization is not adequate for the study of CP violation in charm decays, for example. Hence it should be expanded to higher order of 

Wolfenstein parametrization up to 6

Wolfenstein parametrization can also be obtained from KM matrix by making rotations: s s ei, c c ei, b b ei(+), t t e-i(-) and replacing A, , ,  by A’, ’ , ’ and ’


Flavor charm cp related physics

Look quite differently from those of V(CK)Wolf

8

8


Flavor charm cp related physics

Buras et al. (’94): As in any perturbative expansion, high order terms in  are not unique in the Wolfenstein parametrization, though the nonuniquess of the high order terms does not change physics

Wolfenstein (’83) used |Vub| ~ 0.2 |Vcb| ~ A3

Now |Vub| ~ 0.00351, |Vcb| ~ 0.0412  |Vub| ~ 2 |Vcb|~ A4

  • ~ 0.129,  ~ 0.348 not order of unity !

    We define & of order unity

9


Flavor charm cp related physics

Most of the discrepancies are resolved via the definition of the parameters , of order unity

  • Remaining discrepancies can be alleviated through

  • Vus =  = ’

  • from Vcb

  • from Vub

Ahn, HYC, Oh

arXiv:1106.0935

10


Flavor charm cp related physics

Lepton mixing matrix

Pontecorvo, Maki,

Nakagawa, Sakata

12 = solar  mixing angle, 23 = atmospheric  mixing angle,

13 = reactor  mixing angle

A different parametrization has been studied:

Huang et al.

1108.3906; 1111.3175

12 ~ 19o, 23 ~ 46o, 13 ~ 29o are quite different from

12 ~ 34o, 23 ~ 38o, 13 ~ 9o


Flavor charm cp related physics

12 ~ 13o, 23 ~ 2.4o, 13 ~ 0.2o

quark:

1>>12>>23 >>13

12 ~ 34o, 23 ~ 38o, 13 ~ 9o

lepton:


Flavor charm cp related physics

Baryonic B Decays

  • B  baryon + antibaryon

  • B  baryon + antibaryon + meson

  • B  baryon + antibaryon + 


Flavor charm cp related physics

A baryon pair is allowed in the final state of

hadronic B decays.

In charm decay, Ds+→pn is the only allowed baryonic D decay. Its BR ~ 10-3 (CLEO)


Flavor charm cp related physics

2-body charmless baryonic B decays

Very rare !

CLEO

DLPHI

ARGUS

CLEO

ALEPH

CLEO

CLEO

Belle

Belle

BaBar

Belle

15


Flavor charm cp related physics

CY

CZ=Chernyak & Zhitnitsky (’90), CY= Cheng & Yang (’02)

What is the theory expectation of Br(B0 pp) ?

16


Flavor charm cp related physics

Talk presented at 7th Particle Physics Phenomenology Workshop, 2007


Flavor charm cp related physics

LHCb (1308.0961)

Br(B0 pp)= (1.47+0.62+0.35-0.51-0.14)10-8

Br(Bs0 pp)= (2.84+2.03+0.85-1.08-0.18)10-8

3.3

first evidence

see the talk of Prisciandaro (22C1b)

LHCb (1307.6165) observed a resonance (1520) in B-ppK- decays

Br(B-(1520)p)= (3.9+1.0-0.90.10.3)10-7

(1520)pK-

The pQCD calculation of B0 pp is similar to the pQCD calculation of B→cp (46 Feynman diagrams) by X.G.He, T.Li, X.Q.Li, Y.M.Wang (’06)

Why is Br(B-(1520)p) >> Br(B0 pp) ?


Flavor charm cp related physics

Angular distribution

  • Measurement of angular distributions in dibaryon rest frame will provide further insight of the underlying dynamics

  • SD picture predict a stronger correlation of the meson with the antibaryon than to the baryon in B→B1B2M

B-→pp-

pp rest frame

B rest frame

-

p

u

b

p

-

p

p

B-

p

-

p

-

u

Belle(’08)

(’13)

p

p

-

p

19


Flavor charm cp related physics

-

Angular distribution in penguin-dominated B-ppK-

-

s

u

b

K-

K-

s

u

SD picture predicts a strong correlation between K- and p !

b

u

p

p

-

-

p

p

u

u

Belle(’04)

Belle: K- is preferred to move

collinearly with p in pp rest frame !

 a surprise in correlation

p

p

K-

_

p

BaBar(’05)

(’13)

BaBar measured Dalitz plot

asymmetry

unsolved enigma !

20


Flavor charm cp related physics

Angular distribution in B-p-

s

b

SD picture: Both  & p picks up energetic s and u quarks, respectively ⇒ on the average, pion has no preference for its correlation with  or p⇒a symmetric parabola that opens downward

-

B0

p

u

-

u

+

d

Tsai, thesis (’06)

_

Belle(’07): M.Z. Wang et al.

shows a slanted straight line

⇒another surprise !!

p

p

+

  • Correlation enigma occurs in penguin-dominated modes B→ppK, p

  • Cannot be explained by SD b→ sg* picture

  • Needs to be checked by LHCb & BaBar

  • Theorists need to work hard !

21


Flavor charm cp related physics

Radiative baryonic B decays

At mesonic level, bs electroweak penguin transition manifests in BK*. Can one see the same mechanism in baryonic B decays ?

  • Consider b pole diagram and apply HQS and static b quark limit to relate the tensor matrix element with b form factors

  • Br(B-p)  Br(B-0-) = 1.210-6

  • Br(B-0p)= 2.910-9

    Penguin-induced B-p and B-0- should be readily accessible to

    B factories

HYC,Yang (’02)

Belle [ Lee & Wang et al. PRL 95, 061802 (’05) ]

Br(B-p) = (2.45+0.44-0.380.22)10-6

Br(B-0p) < 4.610-6

first observation of bs in baryonic B decay

22


Flavor charm cp related physics

Extensive studies of baryonic B decays in Taiwan both experimentally and theoretically

Theory

Expt.

Belle group at NTU (Min-Zu Wang,…)

Chen, Chua, Geng, He, Hou, Hsiao, Tsai, Yang, HYC,…

B-→ppK-: first observation of charmless baryonic B decay (’01)

B→pp(K,K*,)

→p(,K)

→K

B→pp, , p (stringent limits)

Publication after 2000: (hep-ph)

0008079, 0107110, 0108068, 0110263, 0112245, 0112294, 0201015, 0204185, 0204186, 0208185, 0210275, 0211240, 0302110,0303079, 0306092, 0307307, 0311035, 0405283, 0503264, 0509235, 0511305, 0512335, 0603003, 0603070, 0605127, 0606036, 0606141, 0607061, 0607178, 0608328, 0609133, 0702249, PRD(05,not on hep-ph), 0707.2751, 0801.0022, 0806.1108, 0902.4295, 0902.4831, 1107.0801, 1109.3032, 1204.4771, 1205.0117, 1302.3331

B→p: first observation of b→s penguin in baryonic B decays (’04)

Publication after 2002:

15 papers (first author) so far: 7PRL, 2PLB, 6PRD; 2 in preparation

Taiwan contributes to 86% of theory papers


Flavor charm cp related physics

Direct CP violation

in charm decays


Flavor charm cp related physics

CP violation in charm decays

  • DCPV requires nontrival strong and weak phase difference

  • In SM, DCPV occurs only in singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays.

    It is expected to be very small in charm sector within SM

Amp = V*cdVud (tree + penguin) + V*csVus (tree’ + penguin)

No CP violation in D decays if they proceed only through tree diagrams

Penguin is needed in order to produce DCPV at tree & loop level

: strong phase

DCPV is expected to be the order of 10-3  10-5 !

25


Flavor charm cp related physics

Experiment

Time-dependent CP asymmetry

Time-integrated asymmetry

LHCb: (11/14/2011) 0.92 fb-1based on 60% of 2011 data

  • ACPACP(D0 K+K-) – ACP(D0+-) = - (0.820.210.11)%

  • 3.5 effect: first evidence of CPV in charm sector

CDF: (2/29/2012) 9.7 fb-1

ACP= Araw(K+K-) - Araw(+-)= - (2.330.14)% - (-1.710.15)%

= - (0.620.210.10)% 2.7 effect

Belle: (ICHEP2012) 540 fb-1

ACP = - (0.870.410.06)%

see Mohanty’s talk (11/25)

26


Flavor charm cp related physics

World averages of LHCb + CDF + BaBar + Belle in 2012

aCPdir = -(0.6780.147)%, 4.6 effect

aCPind = -(0.0270.163)%

Theory estimate is much smaller than the expt’l measurement of |aCPdir |  0.7%  New physics ?

27

27


Flavor charm cp related physics

Chen, Geng, Wang [1206.5158]

Delaunay, Kamenik, Perez, Randall [1207.0474]

Da Rold, Delaunay, Grojean, Perez [1208.1499]

Lyon, Zwicky [1210.6546]

Atwood, Soni [1211.1026]

Hiller, Jung, Schacht [1211.3734]

Delepine, Faisel, Ramirez [1212.6281]

Li, Lu, Qin, Yu [1305.7021]

Buccella, Lusignoli, Pugliese, Santorelli [1305.7343]

Isidori, Kamenik, Ligeti, Perez [1111.4987]

Brod, Kagan, Zupan [1111.5000]

Wang, Zhu [1111.5196]

Rozanov, Vysotsky [1111.6949]

Hochberg, Nir [1112.5268]

Pirtskhalava, Uttayarat [1112.5451]

Cheng, Chiang [1201.0785]

Bhattacharya, Gronau, Rosner [1201.2351]

Chang, Du, Liu, Lu, Yang [1201.2565]

Giudice, Isidori, Paradisi [1201.6204]

Altmannshofer, Primulando, C. Yu, F. Yu [1202.2866]

Chen, Geng, Wang [1202.3300]

Feldmann, Nandi, Soni [1202.3795]

Li, Lu, Yu [1203.3120]

Franco, Mishima, Silvestrini [1203.3131]

Brod, Grossman, Kagan, Zupan [1203.6659]

Hiller, Hochberg, Nir [1204.1046]

Grossman, Kagan, Zupan [1204.3557]

Cheng, Chiang [1205.0580]

28 theory papers !

28

28


Flavor charm cp related physics

Diagrammatic Approach

All two-body hadronic decays of heavy mesons can be expressed in

terms of several distinct topological diagrams [Chau (’80); Chau, HYC(’86)]

T (tree)

A (W-annihilation)

E (W-exchange)

C (color-suppressed)

HYC, Oh (’11)

PA, PAEW

PE, PEEW

P, PcEW

S, PEW

All quark graphs are topological and meant to have all strong interactions encoded and hence they are not Feynman graphs. And SU(3) flavor symmetry is assumed.

29

29


Flavor charm cp related physics

Cabibbo-allowed decays

For Cabibbo-allowed D→PP decays (in units of 10-6GeV)

T= 3.14 ± 0.06 (taken to be real)

C= (2.61 ± 0.08) exp[i(-152±1)o]

E= (1.53+0.07-0.08) exp[i(122±2)o]

A= (0.39+0.13-0.09) exp[i(31+20-33)o]

CLEO (’10)

2=0.39/d.o.f

Rosner (’99)

Wu, Zhong, Zhou (’04)

Bhattacharya, Rosner (’08,’10)

HYC, Chiang (’10)

  • Phase between C & T ~ 150o

  • W-exchange Eis sizable with a large phase  importance of 1/mcpower corrections

  • W-annihilaton A is smaller than Eand almost perpendicular to E

E

C

A

T

The great merit & strong point of this approach  magnitude and strong phase of each topological tree amplitude are determined

30


Flavor charm cp related physics

Tree-level direct CP violation

DCPV can occur even at tree level

A(Ds+ K0+) =d(T + Pd+ PEd) + s(A + Ps+ PEs), p=V*cpVup

DCPV in Ds+ K0+ arises from interference between T & A

 10-4

DCPV at tree level can be reliably estimated in diagrammatic approach as magnitude & phase of tree amplitudes can be extracted from data

Larger DCPV at tree level occurs in decay modes with interference between T & C (e.g. Ds+K+) or C & E (e.g. D00)

31


Flavor charm cp related physics

Tree-level DCPV aCP(tree) in units of per mille

10-3 > adir(tree) > 10-4

Largest tree-level DCPV

PP: D0K0K0, VP: D0’

aCP(tree) vanishes in

D0+-, K+K-

32


Flavor charm cp related physics

Short-distance penguin contributions are very small. How about power corrections to QCD penguin ? SD weak penguin annihilation is also very small; typically, PE / T  0.04 and PA / T  -0.02

Large LD contribution to PE can arise from D0 K+K- followed by a resonantlike final-state rescattering

It is reasonable to assume PE ~ E, PEP ~ EP, PEV ~ EV

Power corrections to P from PE via final-state rescattering cannot be larger than T


Flavor charm cp related physics

aCPdir (10-3)

aCPdir= -0.1390.004% (I)

-0.1510.004% (II)

about 3.3 away from -(0.6780.147)%

A similar result aCPdir=-0.128% obtained by Li, Lu, Yu

see Hsiang-nan Li’s talk (11/25)

Even for PE  T aCPdir = -0.27%, an upper bound in SM

If aCPdir ~ -0.68%, it

is definitely a new physics effect !

34


Flavor charm cp related physics

Attempts for SM interpretation

Golden, Grinstein (’89): hadronic matrix elements enhanced as in I=1/2 rule.

However, D data do not show large I=1/2 enhancement over I=3/2 one.

Moreover, |A0/A2|=2.5 in D decays is dominated by tree amplitudes.

Brod, Kagan, Zupan: PE and PA amplitudes considered

Pirtskhalava, Uttayarat : SU(3) breaking with hadronic m.e. enhanced

Bhattacharya, Gronau, Rosner : Pb enhanced by unforeseen QCD effects

Feldmann, Nandi, Soni : U-spin breaking with hadronic m.e. enhanced

Brod, Grossman, Kagan, Zupan: penguin enhanced

Franco, Mishima, Silvestrini: marginally accommodated

We have argued that power corrections to P from PE via final-state

rescattering cannot be larger than T


Flavor charm cp related physics

LHCb in 2013:

ACP = - (0.340.150.10)% D* tagged

ACP = (0.490.300.14)% B D0X, muon tagged

- (0.150.16)% combination

See D. Tonelli’s talk (11/25)

World average: aCPdir = -(0.3330.120)%, 2.8

aCPind = (0.0150.052)%

Recall that aCPdir = -(0.6780.147)%, 4.6 in 2012 !

It appears that SM always wins !


Flavor charm cp related physics

Direct CP violation in

charmless B decays


Flavor charm cp related physics

Direct CP asymmetries (2-body)

LHCb

AKACP(K-0) – ACP(K-+)

K puzzle: AK is naively expected to vanish

38

38


Flavor charm cp related physics

ACP(B- K-)

Expt:

Theory:

LHCb observed CP violation in B-K-K+K- but not around  resonance

arXiv:1306.1246

LHCb (1309.3742) obtained ACP = (2.22.10.9)%


Flavor charm cp related physics

In heavy quark limit, decay amplitude is factorizable, expressed in terms of form factors and decay constants.

sign

See Beneke & Neubert (’03) for mb results

40

40


Flavor charm cp related physics

A(B0K-+) ua1+c(a4c+ra6c)

Im4c  0.013  wrong sign for ACP

4c

charming penguin, FSI penguin annihilation

1/mb corrections

penguin annihilation

41


Flavor charm cp related physics

New CP puzzles in QCDF

Penguin annihilation solves CP puzzles for K-+,+-,…, but in the meantime introduces new CP puzzles for K-, K*0, …

Also true in SCET with penguin annihilation replaced by charming penguin

42

42

42


Flavor charm cp related physics

All “problematic” modes receive contributions from uC+cPEW

PEW  (-a7+a9), PcEW  (a10+ra8), u=VubV*us, c=VcbV*cs

AK puzzle can be resolved by having a large complex C

(C/T  0.5e–i55 ) or a large complex PEW or the combination

AK 0 if C, PEW, A are negligible

 AK puzzle

o

Large complex C Charng, Li, Mishima; Kim, Oh, Yu; Gronau, Rosner; …

Large complex PEW needs New Physics for new strong & weak phases

Yoshikawa; Buras et al.; Baek, London;

G. Hou et al.; Soni et al.; Khalil et al;…

43


Flavor charm cp related physics

The two distinct scenarios can be tested in tree-dominated modes where ’cPEW << ’uC. CP puzzles of -, 00 & large rates of 00, 00 cannot be explained by a large complex PEW

00 puzzle: ACP=(4324)%, Br = (1.910.22)10-6

44

44


Flavor charm cp related physics

Direct CP asymmetries (3-body)

LHCb found evidence of inclusive CP asymmetry in

B-+--, K+K-K-, K+K--

Large asymmetries observed in localized regions of p.s.

ACP(KK) = -0.6480.0700.0130.007 for mKK2 <1.5 GeV2

ACP(KKK) = -0.2260.0200.0040.007 for 1.2< mKK, low2 <2.0 GeV2, mKK, high2 <15 GeV2

ACP() = 0.584+0.082+0.027+0.007 for m, low2 <0.4 GeV2, m, high2 > 15 GeV2

ACP(K) = 0.6780.0780.0320.007 for 0.08< m, low2 <0.66 GeV2, mK2 <15 GeV2

45


Flavor charm cp related physics

Correlation:

ACP(K-K+K-)  – ACP(K-+-), ACP(-K+K-)  – ACP(-+-)

  • Relative signs between CP asymmetries of K-K+K- & -+-, -K+K- & K-+- are consistent with U-spin prediction.

  • It has been conjectured that CPT theorem & final-state rescattering of +- K+K- may play important roles

Zhang, Guo, Yang [1303.3676]

Bhattacharya, Gronau, Rosner [1306.2625]

Xu, Li, He [1307.7186]

Bediaga, Frederico, Lourenco [1307.8164]

Cheng, Chua [1308.5139]

Zhang, Guo, Yang [1308.5242]

Lesniak, Zenczykowski [1309.1689]

Xu, Li, He [1311.3714]


Flavor charm cp related physics

Conclusion of this section

  • CP asymmetries are the ideal places to discriminate between different models.

  • In QCDF one needs two 1/mb power corrections (one to penguin annihilation, one to color-suppressed tree amplitude) to explain decay rates and resolve CP puzzles

  • Can we understand the correlation ?

    ACP(K-K+K-)  – ACP(K-+-), ACP(-K+K-)  – ACP(-+-)


Flavor charm cp related physics

Conclusions

  • To expand Wolfenstein parametrization to higher order of , it is important to use  &  parameters order of unity.

  • First evidence of charmless baryonic B decays: time for updated theory studies. Correlation puzzle in penguin-dominated decays needs to be resolved.

  • DCPV in charm decays is studied in the diagrammatic approach. It can be reliably estimated at tree level. Our prediction is aCP = -(0.1390.004)%


Flavor charm cp related physics

Backup Slides


Flavor charm cp related physics

: strong phase

To accommodate aCP one needs P/T~ 3 for maximal strong phase, while it is naively expected to be of order s/

Bhattacharya, Gronau, Rosner Brod, Grossman, Kagan, Zupan

Can penguin be enhanced by some nonperturbative effects or unforeseen QCD effects ?

We have argued that power corrections to P from PE via final-state

rescattering cannot be larger than T

50


Flavor charm cp related physics

In D decays

( 22.40.1 in K )

In absence of penguin contribution & SU(3) breaking, this ratio is predicted to be 3.8, larger than the expt’l result. This means P should contribute destructively to A0/A2 .

In kaon decays, the predicted ratio due to tree amplitudes is too small compared to experiment  large enhancement of penguin matrix element.


Flavor charm cp related physics

New Physics interpretation

Before LHCb: Grossman, Kagan, Nir (’07)

Bigi, Paul, Recksiegel (’11)

After LHCb :

  • Model-independent analysis of NP effects Isidori, Kamenik, Ligeti, Perez

  • Tree level (applied to some of SCS modes)

  • FCNC Z

  • FCNC Z’ (a leptophobic massive gauge boson)

  • 2 Higgs-doublet model: charged Higgs

  • Color-singlet scalar

  • Color-sextet scalar (diquark scalar)

  • Color-octet scalar

  • 4th generation

Giudice, Isidori, Paradisi; Altmannshofer, Primulando, C. Yu, F. Yu

Wang, Zhu; Altmannshofer, Primulando, C. Yu, F. Yu

Altmannshofer et al.

Hochberg, Nir

Altmannshofer et al; Chen, Geng, Wang

Altmannshofer et al.

Rozanov, Vysotsky; Feldmann, Nandi, Soni


Flavor charm cp related physics

NP models are highly constrained from D-D mixing, K-K mixing, ’/,… Tree-level models are either ruled out or in tension with other experiments.

Loop level (applied to all SCS modes)

Large C=1 chromomagnetic operator with large imaginary coefficient

is least constrained by low-energy data and can accommodate large ACP.<PP|O8g|D> is enhanced by O(v/mc). However, D0-D0 mixing induced by O8g is suppressed by O(mc2/v2). Need NP to enhance c8g by O(v/mc)

Giudice, Isidori, Paradisi

It can be realized in SUSY models

  • gluino-squark loops

  • new sources of flavor violation from disoriented A terms, split families

  • trilinear scalar coupling

  • RS flavor anarchy warped extra dimension models

Grossman, Kagan, Nir

Giudice, Isidori, Paradisi

Hiller, Hochberg, Nir

Delaunay, Kamenik, Perez, Randall


  • Login