1 / 56

Data Modeling Using the Entity. Relationship Model

Data Modeling Using the Entity. Relationship Model. •. Introduction. Once all the requirements have been collected and analyzed, the next step is to create a conceptual schema for the database, using a high-level conceptual data model. This step is called conceptual design. Introduction.

tulia
Download Presentation

Data Modeling Using the Entity. Relationship Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Data Modeling Using the Entity. Relationship Model

  2. Introduction • Once all the requirements have been collected and analyzed, • the next step is to create a conceptual schema for the database, using a high-level conceptual data model. • This step is called conceptual design.

  3. Introduction • The conceptual schema is a concise description of the data requirements of the users and • includes detailed descriptions of the entity types, relationships, and constraints; • these are expressed using the concepts provided by the high-level data model. • Because these concepts do not include implementation details, they are usually easier to understand and can be used to communicate with nontechnical users.

  4. Introduction • The high-level conceptual schema can also be used as a reference to ensure that • all users' data requirements are met and that the requirements do not conflict. • This approach enables the database designers to concentrate on specifying the properties of the data, • without being concerned with storage details. Consequently, • it is easier for them to come up with a good conceptual database design

  5. ER modeling process is independent of the development platform (or software) • Enables unambiguous, accurate communication of understanding of the data resource in an abstract level • It is used for communications between database designer & users during systemanalysis & design process

  6. Top-down Approach • identify data entities • determine attributes of the entities • determine the nature of the relationships

  7. Top-down Approach – usually results in a data model that is well organized • but details can be easily overlooked.

  8. Bottom-up Approach • gather information on data used by the organization by... • group into entities of which these data are attributes • determine the nature of the relationships –

  9. Bottom-up Approach insures that no important data is overlooked but overall organization may not be so apparent.

  10. E-R Modeling • E/R model consists of: – Entity type – Attribute type – Relationship type

  11. Entity Type • A collection of objects (or a concept) that is identified by the enterprise as having an independent existence & share common properties (characteristics).

  12. Entity Type • Most entities are recognizable business concepts, either concrete or abstract, about which various data are stored. • .

  13. Entity Type – In our usage, the term ‘entity’ will be synonymous with the terms ‘entity type’ or ‘entity class’. – it refers to the generalization of occurrences

  14. Entity Occurrence or an instance • An object or concept that is uniquely identifiable. • Entity occurrence: Mr Mufungulwa is a lecturer at the Copperbelt University • Entity type: Lecturer

  15. Weak & Strong Entity • Weak Entity Type • An entity type that is existence-dependent on some other entity type. • Children of an employee in a company DB.

  16. Strong Entity Type • An entity type that is not existence-dependent on some other entity type. • An employee entity type in a company DB.

  17. Attributes • An attribute is a piece of information at the atomic level - that is it cannot be subdivided into meaningful component pieces • Property of an entity that is of interest to the organization

  18. Attributes • We are usually only interested in a subset of an entity’s attributes which is directly related to the application • it is a good practice to have for each attribute a brief description

  19. Attributes • Registration Number: “The unique identifier assigned by Driver & Vehicle Licensing Agency to a vehicle driven on the public roads in Zambia.”

  20. Attributes • Attributes take on particular values in occurrences • E.g. VehicleID of Car • Each entity will have one (or more) attribute that distinguishes it from all other entities, called an Identifier or a Primary Key

  21. Attributes • Where two or more attributes comprise the identifier it is called a composite identifier • E.g. Patient_Id (Patient_Name, Date_Of_Birth) • An entity type may have more than one key (alternative keys) • E.g. Car Registration No., Vehicle Identification No

  22. Types of Attributes • Simple: • Each entity has a single atomic value for the attribute, for example SSN, CourseNo. • Composite: • The attribute may be composed of several components

  23. Types of Attributes • Multivalued: • An entity may have multiple values for that attribute; for example Color of a Car or PreviousDegrees of a Student • Derived: • The domain value of attribute can be determined from one or more other attributes.

  24. Nested attribute • In general, composite and multiple-valued attributes may be nested arbitrarily to any number of levels • although this is rare.

  25. Relationship • Relationship = An association among entities • STUDENT Taught by LECTURER

  26. Unary or Recursive Relationships • A relationship where the same entity participates more than once in a different roles. • PERSON Married to PERSON • Staff Supervises Staff

  27. Participation & Structural Constraints • Two types: • cardinality and participation constraints. • Cardinality Constraints (Ratio) • Determines the number of possible relationships for each participating entity.

  28. Participation & Structural Constraints • The number of allowed instances of entity B that can (or must) be associated with each instance entity A. • Most common degree for relationships is binary with cardinality ratios of one-to-one (1:1), one-to-many (1:M) or many-to-many (M:N). •

  29. Participation Constraints • is about the importance of the instances’ participation in a specific relationship. • If it is applied to every instance of an entity, then it is called a total or a mandatory participation • (it is a must for each instance belongs to that entity type).

  30. Participation Constraints • If only parts of the instances participate in a relationship or in other words, an instance may or may not participate in that relationship, then this is called a partial or optional participation.

  31. ER-diagram Chen Notation

  32. AN EXAMPLE DATABASE ApPLICATION • Lets consider an example database application, called COMPANY, • it serves to illustrate the basic ER model concepts and their use in schema design. • We first list the data requirements for the database here, and then create its conceptual schema step by step as • we introduce the modeling concepts of the ER model

  33. Problems with ER Models • Problems may arise when designing a conceptual data model called connection traps. • Often due to a misinterpretation of the meaning of certain relationships. • Two main types of connection traps are called fan traps and chasm traps.

  34. Fan Trap • – When a model represents a relationship between entity types, but the pathway between certain entity occurrences is ambiguous.

  35. SCHOOL RESPONSIBLE FOR HAS COURSE TEACHING STAFF

  36. Fan Trap • From the above model we can tell which school is responsible for which course, but we cannot determine which lecturer teaches a particular course.

  37. Chasm Trap • – When a model suggests the existence of a relationship between entity types, but the pathway between certain entity occurrences does not exist.

  38. TEACHING STAFF HAS SUPERVISE DEPARTMENT STUDENT

  39. Chasm Trap • The problems arise when we want to know which students are registered to which department • Since the supervision relationship is optional at both ends we cannot guarantee that each student has a supervisor and • hence we cannot determine the department for a student who has no supervisor.

  40. The Enhanced Entity-Relationship Model • Since 1980s , new demanding applications emerged and hence new requirements . • Basic concepts of ERM are not sufficient to represent the requirements of the newer, more complex applications.

  41. EERM • Response is development of additional ‘semantic’ modelling concepts. • Semantic concepts are incorporated into the original ER model and is called the Enhanced Entity-Relationship (EER) model.

  42. EERM • EERM also useful to represent many real world objects that can be classified naturally into hierarchies. • Additional concepts of EER model includes Specialization / Generalization, & categorisation.

  43. Concept of Specialization /Generalization • Superclass – it is an entity type – it is at a high level (Generalisation) – It includes distinct subclasses that require to be represented in a data model. – it is also known as a Supertype

  44. Subclass • – it is an entity type • – it is at a lower level (Specialisation) • – it is a subset of a supertype • – it has a distinct role • –

  45. Subclass • It is also known as a subtype • – the relationship with a superclass represents an “IS-A” relationship • – it shares common attributes or relationships distinct from other subsets

  46. Subclass • An entity in a subclass may possess subclass specific attributes, as well as those associated with the superclass.

  47. Generalization process • – The process of minimising the differences between entities by identifying their common features.

  48. Super class/ Subclass participation Constraints • – Disjoint Mandatory • – Disjoint Optional • – Overlapping Optional • – Overlapping Mandatory

More Related