1 / 11

Christian Ydesen and Yihuan Zou Friday, 24 March, 2017 NERA Conference

The Role of Numbers in Education Governance – the case of OECD’s educational recommendations and programmes. Christian Ydesen and Yihuan Zou Friday, 24 March, 2017 NERA Conference. Outline of the presentation. Outset: the OECD and numbers Questions of impact The basic impact model

tteresa
Download Presentation

Christian Ydesen and Yihuan Zou Friday, 24 March, 2017 NERA Conference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Role of Numbers in Education Governance – the case of OECD’s educational recommendations and programmes Christian Ydesen and Yihuan Zou Friday, 24 March, 2017 NERA Conference

  2. Outline of the presentation • Outset: the OECD and numbers • Questions of impact • The basic impact model • A methodological model • OECD and education • OECD and education in Denmark • OECD and education in China • Concluding remarks

  3. Outset • The OECD is one of the most powerful International Organisations in the shaping of a global education space (country reviews, international assessment programmes and reports) “a curious creature…an amalgam of a rich man's club, a management consulting firm for governments, and a legislative body” (Salzman and Terracino 2006: 323) ”A global layer of state” (Shaw 2000: 213) • The role of quantification has played a crucial part in shaping and thus governing the field of education–a framework of indicators • Education metrics are reshaping the very ways IOs compete and survive in an increasingly quantified world

  4. A historical view on quantification • Douglas Aircraft Corp. - Ford foundation – RAND ”Systems Analysis and Education” “We went out to the RAND Corporation and got Joe [Joseph E.] Kershaw, who was then head of their economics department and getting very tired of working on weapons systems, to take a colleague and go sit in a local school system for a couple of months and see if “systems analysis” could be applied to a public school system” Philip Hall Coombs, head of the Ford Foundation’s Fund for the Advancement of Education • 1957 Sputnik shock  Committee for Scientific and Technical Personnel, 1958 “May I say that, in this context, the fight for education is too important to be left solely to the educators” US government adviser, 1961

  5. - Questions of Impact - • How are ideas and initiatives transmitted in practice from one venue to another? • Which distribution channels are used? • How are ideas and initiatives made acceptable to different populations? • What are the effects of moving ideas and initiatives? • We argue that numbers play a pivotal role in terms of providing answers to these question. • Hansen and Porter suggest that numbers are characterized by qualities that make their influence much more pervasive than words: order, mobility, stability, combinability, and precision

  6. The Basic Impact Model : Idea-Initiative-Intervention-ImpactSource: Leeuw, Frans & Vaessen, Jos (2009), Impact Evaluations and Development. NONIE Guidance on Impact Evaluation, Washington DC: NONIE—The Network of Networks on Impact Evaluation.Späth, Brigitte (2004), Current State of the Art in Impact Assessment, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation.

  7. A methodological model Reciprocity, crossings, transformations, conflicting narratives, uneven power structures and unintended impact Source: Christensen, I.L. & Ydesen C.: “Routes of Knowledge: Toward a methodological framework for tracing the historical impact of international organizations” European Education, 47, 3, 2015, pp. 274-288.

  8. - OECD and education - • The role of education is to provide human capital to deal with social challenges and improve the economies of nation-states. • Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI), 1968. • 1970s: focus on the labour market, equal access and life-long learning - country reports. • 1980s: focus on youth unemployment; “A Nation at Risk: Imperatives for Educational Reform” (1983)  establishment of the International Indicators of Educational Systems (INES) project. • 1990s: international comparisons take centre stage; Education at a glance (1992) and individual country reports • 2000s: Programme for International Student Assessment

  9. - OECD and Education in Denmark - Programme for Educational Investment and Planning, 1962  call for statistical data from member countries  an economic and statistical counsellor was employed in the Danish Ministry of education in 1963: • Individual data on students (“educational behaviour”) • Teacher/pupil ratios • Needs for new schools (small  larger schools) • SEN children • School buildings • Data on university students (preceding education, subjects and exam results) • Statistics on teachers • Commercial and vocational education students • Periodical analysis of the accounts of a number of public and private schools • Factors effecting student’s choice of education programmes • Progress report on the planning of education investments, 1965 (attention of the European Ministers of Education)  Give advise to central and local authorities concerning education planning

  10. - OECD and Education in China - • OECD enjoys a high level of credibility and authority in China • The influence of OECD on Chinese education is mainly through four channels: • PISA test (Shanghai took part in in 2009. Beijing, Jiangsu and Guangdong joined in 2015) • Reports containing data, concepts, frameworks and initiatives deemed relevant to China • Conferences with Chinese partners (Ministry of Education, etc.) • Country reports on Chinese education • Sense of urgency (burning platform)

  11. Concluding remarks • Channels: programmes, reports • Mechanisms: comparisons (so ein Ding…), soft governance and pragmatism • The purpose and authority of the organisation are key; numbers are pivotal in that respect • Scope of impact: sense of urgency  education reforms

More Related