1 / 10

Fantasy Sports: A Website Comparison

Fantasy Sports: A Website Comparison. Joel Stubblefield Alex McGhee MBAS 6320. Industry Background. Estimated Revenues from 2006 $1.5 Billion 19.4 Million Active Players 2 Million Active Teen Players 55% of Players Earn More Than $60,000/year

trygg
Download Presentation

Fantasy Sports: A Website Comparison

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fantasy Sports:A Website Comparison Joel Stubblefield Alex McGhee MBAS 6320

  2. Industry Background • Estimated Revenues from 2006 $1.5 Billion • 19.4 Million Active Players • 2 Million Active Teen Players • 55% of Players Earn More Than $60,000/year • 55% of Players Report They Not Only Watch More Sports but Also Attend More Events Because of Their Involvement

  3. Rankings Criteria • Ease of Use • Depth of Information • Value vs. Cost • Services Offered • Appearance

  4. Top Three • 1. www.rotoworld.com • Industry Leader in Depth of Quality Information • Majority of the Information is Free • Easy to Locate Needed Information as Well as Automatic Refreshment • Don’t Host Leagues

  5. Top Three • 2. www.espn.com • Professional Appearance • Host Leagues • Wealth of Information/Opinions • High Value but Not Completely Free

  6. Top Three • 3. www.yahoo.com • Industry Leader in League Hosting • Lag in Information/Analysis • Easy to Navigate • Most Services Require Fees

  7. Worst Three • www.fantasysportscentral.com • Cluttered • Poorly Organized • Cheap Appearance • Outdated Information • Poor Value (Must Pay a Fee to NOT Receive Pop-ups)

  8. Worst Three • www.head2head.com • Only Host Leagues • Very Limited Information • Outdated Articles • Drab • Difficult to Navigate

  9. Worst Three • www.fsru.com • Information Displayed in a Confusing Manner • Outdated Graphics that are Distracting • Poor Value/Almost Everything on the Site Involves a Fee • Information is Poor and Old

  10. Best Practices Mistakes To Avoid • Constantly Updated Information • Offering Both Free and Premium Services • Daily Articles • Easy to Find Information • Outdated Information • Fee Only Services • Cheap Appearance • Cluttered or Distracting Layout • Difficult to Find Information

More Related