html5-img
1 / 9

Collaborations in Research: The Common IRB Model

Collaborations in Research: The Common IRB Model. Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October 19, 2010. Eric C. Mah IRB Director University of California – Davis ecmah@ucdavis.edu. UC DAVIS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. The Problem.

trung
Download Presentation

Collaborations in Research: The Common IRB Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Collaborations in Research:The Common IRB Model Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October 19, 2010 Eric C. Mah IRB Director University of California – Davis ecmah@ucdavis.edu

  2. UC DAVIS • UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

  3. The Problem A bureaucratic, regulatory obstacle of double IRB review at local VA & developing HRPP at prominent, neighboring children’s hospital • VA Northern California Health Care System • Local IRB with limited resources • Duplicative review for UC Davis faculty with joint appointments • Northern California Shriners Hospitals for Children • Lack capacity, expertise for a local IRB • Limited resources available for commercial IRB review

  4. Opportunities New relationship requires trust, communication Eliminate a double IRB review Save researcher, institutional resources Faster site initiation Streamline IRB review process Risks/Threats Unfamiliar VA structure, policies and bureaucracy Additional administrative burden on UC Davis Increased administrative costs for UC Davis VA Northern California & UC Davis

  5. Opportunities Expand research, collaboration in pediatrics Support a neighbor institution Save researcher, institutional resources Faster site initiation Risks/Threats Shriners lacked a clear research compliance program No COI review, etc. Some researchers unaffiliated with UC Davis UC Davis possibly exposed to significant liability VA Northern California & UC Davis

  6. UC Davis’ Pathway to Success VA • Established new workflows and business processes to adapt to local policies, procedures • 200+ studies avoid double IRB review • Significantly increased VA engaged research • Increase in CTSC-VA engaged studies from 5 to 39+ • Increased VA research funding to $32 M • Offered cutting edge research to VA patients • Increased accrual to oncology trials for UC Davis NCI-designated cancer center • Clinical research resources that would not otherwise be available for both institutions

  7. UC Davis’ Pathway to Success • Shriners Hospital • Education, conceptualization of a human research protection program • Established FWA, MOU with UC Davis • UC Davis also performs COIC review, as needed • 30+ studies reviewed on behalf of Shriners • The UC Davis CTSC played a pivotal role in partnering with VA & Shriners, building regional capacity

  8. UC Davis Results • Increased the number of available trials between the institutions • All stakeholders needs addressed through ongoing communication, open channels • Designated VA-UC Davis liaison • Efficiencies identified, resources preserved • Especially true for VA, Shriners, and UC Davis researchers • The rights and welfare of research subjects in no way compromised

  9. UC Davis - Future • Ongoing, shared commitment to human subjects protection • Identify other institutions and entities for collaboration, expansion • Creativity, open-mindedness, and willing to trust--ensures future successes

More Related