Dielectron Analysis Status

1 / 17

# Dielectron Analysis Status - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dielectron Analysis Status. WIS 21-Aug-14. Normalization. Get the normalization factors for the like sign spectra: Get in integrals of the normalized like sign spectra: Get the normalization factor for the unlike sign spectrum:. Normalization I. Normalization II. HIJING (~0-10% central).

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

## PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Dielectron Analysis Status' - trory

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

### Dielectron Analysis Status

WIS

21-Aug-14

Normalization
• Get the normalization factors for the like sign spectra:
• Get in integrals of the normalized like sign spectra:
• Get the normalization factor for the unlike sign spectrum:

Normalization I.

Normalization II.

HIJING (~0-10% central)
• Compare the combinatorial background from SAME event with the combinatorial background from MIXED event
• How do we select the combinatorial background from SAME event:

vert1!=vert2

(both legs are coming from different space points)

OR

vert1==vert2 && vertr1==0 && vertr2==0

(both legs are coming from exactly zero – these are pi+ and pi-)

HIJING (~0-10% central)
• Applying the Normalization II:

-> the ratio of the combinatorics from the SAME and the MIXED is:

0.9898 +/- 0.0003

HIJING (~0-10% central)
• Applying the Normalization I:

-> the ratio of the combinatorics from the SAME and the MIXED is 1

HIJING to DATA

-> Assuming the results from HIJING are correct we apply normalization I. to the data

• Standards CA eID is applied
• DC ghost track rejected
• RICH ghost event rejected
• Normalization done after CA and ghost cuts
• HBD cuts applied later
• In the following slides the data set is ~1B events
Cabana Boy settings

//CabanaBoy *cb = new CabanaBoy(10,8,1,"ULMM_DataTrack");

CabanaBoy *cb = new CabanaBoy(10,8,6,"ULMM_DataTrack"); cb->setPoolType(CabanaBoy::AkibaPools);cb->setPoolDepth(100);cb->setFastMom(false);cb->setZVertexMax(20.0);//cb->setReactionPlaneSelectionType(CabanaBoy::ReactionPlaneNotUsed);

cb->setReactionPlaneSelectionType(CabanaBoy::ReactionPlaneRun7RXNEllipticSN); cb->setCentralitySelectionType(CabanaBoy::CentralityTypeRun10AuAu200);

• Other settings
• CA eID cuts
• no HBD cuts applied
• Ghost events rejected
Nlike/Blike , S+- (0 < centrality < 10)

CA + ghost rej.

CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching)

CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching)

+ S/D rejection

Nlike/Blike , S+- (10 < centrality < 20)

CA + ghost rej.

CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching)

CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching)

+ S/D rejection

Nlike/Blike , S+- (20 < centrality < 40)

CA + ghost rej.

CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching)

CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching)

+ S/D rejection

Nlike/Blike , S+- (40 < centrality < 92)

CA + ghost rej.

CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching)

CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching)

+ S/D rejection

Applying strong eID cuts
• eID cuts:
• n0 > 3
• sqrt(emcsdphi*emcsdphi + emcsdz*emcsdz) < 2
• dep > -1 [#]
• chi2/npe0 < 5
• disp < 4
• prob > 0.05
• |zed| < 75
• In the following slides the data set is ~2B events
Nlike/Blike , S+- (0 < centrality < 10)

CA + ghost rej.

CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching)

CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching)

+ S/D rejection

Nlike/Blike , S+- (10 < centrality < 20)

CA + ghost rej.

CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching)

CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching)

+ S/D rejection

Nlike/Blike , S+- (20 < centrality < 40)

CA + ghost rej.

CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching)

CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching)

+ S/D rejection

Nlike/Blike , S+- (40 < centrality < 92)

CA + ghost rej.

CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching)

CA + ghost rej. + HBD (matching)

+ S/D rejection

Summary
• There is some correlation in like sign?
• It is masked by the combinatorics in the central, but becomes visible in the peripheral?
• The like-sign ratio looks flat for the central and the normalization is reasonble?
• Should we apply some kind of “jet-free region” normalization for the peripheral?
• Will try to study peripheral events in HIJING