Using libqual results observations from arl program making library assessment work
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 17

Using LibQUAL+™ Results Observations from ARL Program “Making Library Assessment Work” PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 56 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Using LibQUAL+™ Results Observations from ARL Program “Making Library Assessment Work”. Steve Hiller University of Washington Libraries ARL Visiting Program Officer 2004-06. Making Library Assessment Work: Practical Approaches for Developing and Sustaining Effective Assessment.

Download Presentation

Using LibQUAL+™ Results Observations from ARL Program “Making Library Assessment Work”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Using libqual results observations from arl program making library assessment work

Using LibQUAL+™ ResultsObservations from ARL Program “Making Library Assessment Work”

Steve Hiller

University of Washington Libraries

ARL Visiting Program Officer 2004-06


Using libqual results observations from arl program making library assessment work

Making Library AssessmentWork:Practical Approaches for Developing and Sustaining Effective Assessment

  • 2 year ARL project to assist libraries with moving assessment efforts forward

  • Led by Steve Hiller (UW) and Jim Self (UVa)

  • Recognition that libraries understand value of assessment but have trouble sustaining efforts and using results

  • Site visits conducted to evaluate assessment and develop practical approaches to effective local practices

  • Identify common barriers and facilitators to assessment

  • 7 libraries participating in Phase I Spring 2005; 12-14 during 2005-06 academic year; final report in 2006


Phase i libraries and latest libqual survey

Phase I Libraries and Latest LibQUAL+™ Survey

  • Spring 2005 ParticipantsLatest Survey Year

    • University of Arizona2004 (2005 too)

    • Arizona State University2004

    • University of Connecticut2004

    • University of Illinois U-C2002

    • New York University2002

    • University of Notre Dame2002

    • University of Oregon2005


Using libqual results some general observations

Using LibQUAL+™ ResultsSome General Observations

  • Response numbers low, especially for faculty

  • Comparisons important

    • Between internal group

    • By academic area

    • Peer institutions

    • Over time

  • Uncertain how to analyze

  • Uncertain how to follow-up unless very negative

  • Difficulty in using for planning and decision-making

  • Comments help tell the story and pinpoint problems


Size matters maximize the number of survey responses

SIZE MATTERS! Maximize the Number of Survey Responses


Using libqual results observations from arl program making library assessment work

LibQUAL+ ™ Number of Survey Respondents by Group


Using libqual results observations from arl program making library assessment work

Respondent Composition by Selected Academic Area & Group 2003-04 - University “Z”


Some complementary information

Some Complementary Information

  • Fine Arts/Architecture libraries “temporarily” merged

  • Budget reductions impacted collections and staff

    • Book budget cut

  • Some hours reduced in branch libraries

  • Comments corroborated the above as important concerns for faculty and graduate students


University x peer comparisons

University “X” Peer Comparisons


University x overall library quality mining the data faculty frequency responses by area

University “X” Overall Library Quality:Mining the Data - Faculty Frequency Responses By Area


University x comments

Likes

Librarian liaisons*****

ILL**

Concerns

Copiers

Loan periods/renewals

Print collection (Faculty)

Journal collection (Faculty)

Noise

Student assistants

Off-campus online access

Web site

University “X” Comments


Service adequacy gaps by dimension university x undergrads by year in school

Service Adequacy Gaps by DimensionUniversity “X”Undergrads by Year in School


Information control y arl adequacy gaps by group 2005

Information Control “Y”/ARL Adequacy Gaps By Group 2005


  • Login