The development, implementation and redesigning of a task-based language curriculum for primary schools

1. � 2005 The development, implementation and redesigning of a task-based language curriculum for primary schools Marleen Colpin & Koen Van Gorp Centre for Language and Migration (K.U.Leuven)

2. � 2005 Centre for Language and Migration Within the Flemish Educational Priority Policy 3 main tasks: research support of teachers and teacher trainers syllabus and curriculum development Both in primary and secondary education

3. � 2005 Flemish Educational Priority Policy Challenge: Provide equal educational opportunities to all children regardless of their (linguistic) background How? Efficient and effective language teaching especially for both L1-learners at risk and L2 learners

4. � 2005 Language teaching: early '90s (1) Language teaching doesn�t meet the needs of a diverse student population and isn�t focussed on acquiring academic language proficiency It is very much based on teacher-centered PPP-paradigm (presentation, practice and production)

5. � 2005 Language teaching: early '90s (2) Time-allocation: 51% focus on form(s) 32% language awareness 20% traditional grammar excercises 19% spelling 23% reading, 10% writing, 7% speaking, 5% listening whereas 90-95% of the attainment targets deal with language proficiency

6. � 2005 De Toren van Babbel (TvB) The first task-based language curriculum for primary schools in Flanders To meet the challenge of equal opportunities and concerns of the early '90's Designed from 1992 to 1995

7. � 2005 Starting point Building on experience with communicative language teaching Focussing on language profiency Conceptions of 'task' as unit of analysis in syllabus design (Long & Crookes, 1993) Needs analysis of academic language register in primary education tools: vocabulary list as a means to control language input in TvB

8. � 2005 Task example: Who is the thief? Grandmother Mouse came home through the back door. Her arrival frightened a thief. On entering she heard him running away through the front door; she also heard a metallic tool hitting the ground. But she was too late to see the thief. Her friend the fox detective Sherlock Holmes arrived promptly. He entered through the back door accompanied by the two major suspects: the bear and the stork. They were the only persons working nearby, so one of them had to be the thief. Sherlock looked about the living room. After inspecting the front door and noticing the wrench he immediately knew who the thief was. Who is the culprit: the bear or the stork?

9. � 2005 Who is the thief? (2)

10. � 2005 Powerful learning environmentsfor language learning

11. � 2005 The concept of task Language as a means� � to reach a motivating goal Involve relevant and natural language needs analysis of academic language pedagogical tasks as stepping stones manipulations of authentic target tasks in terms of complexity and motivating power but processing and language demands resemble target tasks Contain language learning potential zone of next potential, negotiated difficulty

12. � 2005 The concept of task (2) Elicit interaction and feedback: co-operative learning interaction serves different functions motivate, feedback (on meaning and form), collaborative dialogue, � stimulating peer interaction heterogeneous groups promoting task-based interaction e.g. jigsaw, �

13. � 2005 The concept of task (3) Focus on role of the teacher: motivating language learners creating a positive, safe climate organizing learning environment confronting leaners with meaningful, relevant tasks supporting language learners negotiate, provide feedback, stimulate peer interaction, � = differentiated according to learners' needs

14. � 2005 Focus on form & focus on forms Primary focus on meaning (80% of the time) Focus on form activities (FoF): language awareness activities a mapping of form on function approach grammar: insight in how language works Focus on forms (FoFs): technical reading abilities, spelling

15. � 2005 Implementation of TvB (1) 18% of Dutch primary schools have bought TvB (especially educational priority schools, but also other schools) Positive voices about choice of themes, activities, group work and learning methods motivating power of tasks, texts, �

16. � 2005 Implementation of TvB (2) The problems: Too much, too difficult activities, reading texts Too little 'real practice' (exercises) spelling, grammar

17. � 2005 Implementation of TvB (3) Some teachers' concerns were not met Spelling (all grades) Additional spelling materials are used Technical reading (2nd and 3th grade) Evaluation (all grades) Differentiation in amount and complexity of lesson materials (all grades) Remedial teaching (all grades) Not enough support for learner feedback

18. � 2005 10 years later� what has changed? Learning from past implementation experiences Taking into account new developments in CTM and task-based approach in general

19. � 2005 2005-2007: TotemTaal Second task-based language curriculum for primary schools Fundamental changes and choices underlying task-based curriculum beginning of 21th century

20. � 2005 Changes and choices Concept of task Concept of syllabus design � complexity The role of the teacher Focus on Form(s) Task-based language assessment

21. � 2005 Concept of task Open tasks With a clearly defined goal Allowing a great deal of intellectual and creative freedom Promoting task-based interaction With maximal potential for learning Relevant tasks With regard to the attainment goals Task-based + Task-oriented Pedagogical tasks: manipulate complexity, variety and motivational power

22. � 2005 Examples of attainment goalsfor the end of primary education Listening The pupils can understand and structure the information from an explanation or an instruction of the teacher. Writing The pupils can write a report of an event, a story or an informative text for a familiar person.

23. � 2005 Concept of syllabus designCriteria for selection and sequencing Relevance and naturalness Characteristics defining tasks settings of different parameters, each of which is a continuum of diversity and complexity

24. � 2005 Parameters and settings Each task challenges pupils to� exercise one or more of the four language skills listening � speaking � reading � writing handle a text of a certain type, meant for a certain public informative texts / argumentative texts / directive texts / ... known peer / unknown peer / known adult / unknown adult

25. � 2005 Parameters and settings (2) handle information, depending on the goal of the task, on a certain level of processing copy - understand as such/describe - structure - evaluate handle texts about different subjects, representing or revealing a different �world�, e.g. from here-and-now to there-and-then from a more concrete of a more generalizing perspective demanding more of less knowledge of the world offering more or less linguistic/visual support

26. � 2005 Parameters and settings (3) � and the text (spoken or written) distinguishes itself by a certain: vocabulary syntax structure code conventions ... all of which can be more of less difficult.

27. � 2005 Task complexity Overall complexity = sum of all the settings Defining settings allows: to gain insight in complexity to �manipulate� complexity In terms of making a task easier or more difficult on one or more parameters In terms of building in extra support to control diversity

28. � 2005 Examples: write a report of an event Second grade: write a report of the creation of an animal (on a pre-structured card) Fourth grade: write a report of �a day in the live of the king (in a table with hours) Sixth grade: write a report of your quest to liberate Mr. Orange (free structure)

29. � 2005 Examples: parameter-settings

30. � 2005 Teacher support & differentiation e.g. Help to put ideas in a row Ask questions from the perspective of the reader of the report Remind of the goal of the report Point out where the report is not accurate, too extensive, ... Offer a scheme for writing

31. � 2005 The concept of parameters and settings Selecting and sequencing tasks Support Evaluation

32. � 2005 Broad concept of evaluation on a permanent base as well as at specific moments throughout the school year on products the pupils produce as well as on their acquisition/learning process with more traditional tests as well as more �alternative� evaluation instruments, such as observation instruments, portfolio, ... by the teacher as well as the pupils themselves or other pupils