1 / 16

Central Institutional Review Board CIRB Initiative

travis
Download Presentation

Central Institutional Review Board CIRB Initiative

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. 1 NCRR-CTSA-NICHD Workshop on Comparing IRB Models for Multisite Pediatric Studies Jacquelyn Goldberg, JD Head, NCI CIRB Initiative goldberj@mail.nih.gov Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) Initiative

    2. Topics Background of the CIRB Initiative How the CIRB model works Profile

    3. The NCI CIRB Initiative - Background Established in 1999 as recommended in the Armitage Report from the NCI's Clinical Trials Program Review Group: Help NCI create a more efficient and effective clinical research effort Streamline or eliminate redundant processes and procedures

    4. The NCI CIRB Initiative Goals: To reduce the significant local administrative burdens for multi-site trials while maintaining a high level of human subjects protection To enhance the protection of research participants by providing consistent expert IRB review at the national level

    5. Adult and Pediatric Boards Adult CIRB Started reviewing protocols November 2001 Menu is all adult Cooperative Group Phase 3 treatment trials 16-18 members with adult oncology expertise 25% patient advocates Pediatric CIRB Started reviewing protocols January 2004 Menu is all COG phase 2, 3 and pilot protocols 16-18 members with pediatric oncology expertise 25% patient advocates

    6. Selecting a CIRB Model OHRP allows for different centralized IRB models See Guidance of August 27,1998 (updated July 21, 2000) entitled “Knowledge of Local Research Context” http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/local.htm Model B– Central IRB review with some local IRB review More appropriate where local IRB exists Value of this model: LIRB provides understanding of local context CIRB provides full Board review at no charge

    7. Division of Responsibilities CIRB and LIRB share regulatory responsibilities The CIRB’s primary function is initial and continuing review of studies The local institution’s primary function is consideration of local context, oversight of local performance, review of locally occurring adverse events

    8. Institution must formally enroll Modify FWA Sign Authorization Agreement Local investigator is notified of new study via Routine Group activation announcement CIRB semi-monthly Study Activity Update email If the local investigator decides to open study All the CIRB initial review documents are downloaded from the website: the completed CIRB application, the protocol, the CIRB approved consent, CIRB meeting minutes, approval letters, etc.; PI/CRA and/or the LIRB can do this

    9. Contact the NCI CIRB

    10. Local chair/subcommittee assesses CIRB review and decides whether to accept it or not If accepts CIRB review - assure their local concerns are addressed (“facilitated review”) If does not accept CIRB review – decide to review study per local procedures Full Board does not meet; approval can occur in days If LIRB accepts, they notify CIRB via CIRB website. The CIRB becomes the IRB of record for that study at that site and is responsible for reviewing amendments, continuing reviews, adverse events distributed by the Group, recruitment materials, etc.

    11. Examples No prisoners Assent requirement CIRB; whether and how to document LIRB Translated consents are local Consent template approved by CIRB; Ok for LIRB to add local boilerplate involving institutional policy and state law; Ok to tweak consent as per OHRP-Cooperative Group agreement HIPPA Local PI and IRB notified of all CIRB actions

    12. Operations A single contractor Operations Office supports both Boards and participating institutions and recruitment of new institutions; 2 NCI FTEs and contractor has 14 staff Volume of protocols on Pediatric side est. 25 new protocols a year max; COG phase 2,3 and pilot Contract close to $3 million annually; have not separated out peds costs; NCI covers cost; no fee for institutions Pursuing AAHRPP accreditation 2009-2010

    13. Total Number of Institutions Enrolled: 341 Number of Institutions using Adult CIRB only: 223 Number of Institutions using Pediatric CIRB only: 52 Number of Institutions using both Adult/Peds: 66 Estimate of Potential Pool of Institutions Enrolled Adult CIRB: 55+% of 2,000 research sites Pediatric CIRB: 63% of 189 COG institutions Number of Total Studies Available for Facilitated Review 216 Adult 136 Pediatric 80 CIRB Initiative Profile

    16. Challenges When began in 2001 was radical; less so 2004; less so now Managing expectations: the stakeholders who clamor for a new model may not be prepared for what that actually means Adult has 9 Groups/Peds has 1 Group Don’t underestimate complexity and therefore cost As previously discussed and present in the handout…As previously discussed and present in the handout…

    17. Website: http://www.ncicirb.org Email: ncicirbcontact@emmes.com CIRB Toll-free Number: 888-657-3711 Fax Number: 301-560-6538 Mailing address: NCI CIRB C/O The EMMES Corporation 401 N. Washington Street, Suite 700 Rockville, MD 20850 As previously discussed and present in the handout…As previously discussed and present in the handout…

More Related