1 / 16

Finite Reinsurance Reserving

Finite Reinsurance Reserving. Nick Giuntini, FCAS, MAAA CLRS, September 2003. General Approach. Generally Reserved on an Individual Contract Basis Lack of Homogeneity LPTs, Agg XOLs, Q/Ss Varied Terms Varied Underlying Often Large Contracts Underlying Exposure and Deal Modeling

travis-ryan
Download Presentation

Finite Reinsurance Reserving

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Finite Reinsurance Reserving Nick Giuntini, FCAS, MAAA CLRS, September 2003

  2. Finite Reinsurance Reserving General Approach • Generally Reserved on an Individual Contract Basis • Lack of Homogeneity • LPTs, Agg XOLs, Q/Ss • Varied Terms • Varied Underlying • Often Large Contracts • Underlying Exposure and Deal Modeling • Accounting May Vary • Risk Transfer – Reinsurance Accounting • Can Reinsurer Discount Reserves? • “No Risk Transfer” – Deposit Accounting

  3. Finite Reinsurance Reserving Hypothetical Aggregate XOL • Whole Account • $1 Billion Est. Subject Premium • 10% xs 75% Loss Ratio or $100M xs $750M of Losses • Additional Premium = 55% of Covered Loss • Funds Withheld Balance (FWB) • Crediting Interest Rate = 8.5% • Effective 1/1/2000 (2000 Underwriting Year)

  4. Finite Reinsurance Reserving Aggregate XOL Retained Losses LAYER OF COVERAGE Limit + Retention = 85% l/r or $850M Retention = 75% l/r or $750M Retained Losses

  5. Finite Reinsurance Reserving Aggregate XOL FWB Limit = $100M INTEREST CREDIT COVERED LOSSES Premium = $55M

  6. Finite Reinsurance Reserving Mean or Mode • Assume: • Reinsurer can Discount Losses • Cedent Reports a 80% loss ratio • FWB Expected to Cover Ceded Loss Payout ($27.5M of Premium + Interest for $50M Losses) • Should Reinsurer Set up a Reserve for Obligations in Excess of FWB?

  7. Finite Reinsurance Reserving Credit Risk • If Cedent becomes Insolvent, Reinsurer’s Funds are at Risk: • Premiums and Interest “Paid” into FWB • Funds Transferred Triggers on Certain Events • If not transferred offset generally believed to hold • Premiums not yet Paid into FWB • Offset Probably Holds • Future Interest Credits • Offset Questionable

  8. Finite Reinsurance Reserving Credit Risk – Interest Income • Assume: • Reserving at 12/31/2003 • Expected Loss Ratio = 85% • $736M Paid to Date (Paid Losses still in Retention) • FWB = $76M (for $100M of Ceded Losses) • What is the Magnitude of the Reinsurer’s Credit Risk?

  9. Finite Reinsurance Reserving Credit Risk – Interest Income * PV of Shortfall if FWB is transferred to Reinsurer and only earns Current Interest %.

  10. Finite Reinsurance Reserving Credit Risk – Under-Reporting • Assume: • Same as before, but • Expected Loss Ratio = 85%, • Reported Loss Ratio = 80% • FWB = $38M (for $50M of Reported but ultimately $100M of Reported Losses) • Now What is the Magnitude of the Reinsurer’s Credit Risk?

  11. Finite Reinsurance Reserving Credit Risk – Under-Reporting * PV of Shortfall if FWB is transferred to Reinsurer and only earns Current Interest %.

  12. Finite Reinsurance Reserving Tail Factor Selection • Generally Higher Tail Factors are “Conservative” for the Reinsurer • For this Cover, an Increase in Paid Losses After 8 Years is Good for Reinsurer • Assume: • Reserving at 12/31/2003 • Expected Loss Ratio = 80% (given tail factor) • $694M Paid to Date (Paid Losses still in Retention)

  13. Finite Reinsurance Reserving Amount of APs

  14. Finite Reinsurance Reserving Tail Factor Selection

  15. Finite Reinsurance Reserving Tail Factor Selection * Negative Numbers are PV Reinsurers Loss at 4%.

  16. Finite Reinsurance Reserving Conclusion • There can be Additional Reserving Issues and Concerns for Finite Contracts Due to: • Contract Structure • Legal Jurisdiction • Accounting Regime

More Related