Oct 24 26 2005 shepard@brandeis edu tel 781 736 3975 brandeis university waltham ma 02454
1 / 15

Oct. 24-26, 2005 Shepard@Brandeis Tel 781 736 3975 Brandeis University, Waltham MA 02454 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentation

Oct. 24-26, 2005 Shepard@Brandeis Tel 781 736 3975 Brandeis University, Waltham MA 02454

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Cost-effectiveness of telephone counseling and relapse prevention for cocaine or alcohol dependent clientsDonald S Shepard1Aaron Beaston-Blaakman2 James McKay31 Brandeis University, Schneider Institute for Health Policy, Waltham, MA2 Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, NC3 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Oct. 24-26, 2005


Tel 781 736 3975

Brandeis University, Waltham MA 02454

Brandeis University

Introduction: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA)

Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) seek to help programs and payers allocate shrinking resources for substance abuse treatment most effectively.

Brandeis University

Methods: Design

  • Random assignment study

  • Each approach entailed 1-2 counseling initial contacts per week

  • Each intervention lasted 12 weeks

  • Quarterly research follow-up over 2 years

Brandeis University

Methods: Subjects

  • 359 Philadelphia adult alcohol or cocaine dependent clients

  • Had just completed intensive outpatient treatment.

Brandeis University

Methods: Interventions

  • Standard care (standard group continuing care, STND) was the reference against which the two newer approaches to continuing care were compared.

  • Relapse prevention emphasized individual in-person sessions (RP)

  • Telephone counseling (TEL) delivered most sessions by phone with the fewest minutes of therapeutic contact.

Brandeis University

Methods: Costs

  • Program costs were assessed with a preliminary version of the Treatment Cost Analysis Tool (TCAT).

  • Following recommended CE guidelines, societal costs were also included.

  • Clients’ travel expenses averaged $2.75 per round trip (bulk tickets on Philadelphia public transport)

  • Clients’ time in treatment, waiting, and travel were valued at Pennsylvania minimum wage ($5.65/hr)

Brandeis University

Comparative intensity of interventions

Brandeis University

Average costs of interventions per client

Brandeis University

Results: Effectiveness

Brandeis University

Results: Cost-Effectiveness

Brandeis University

Results: Cost per incremental abstinent year

Brandeis University

Discussion: Program cost comparison

Discussion: Societal cost comparison

Results: Cost-Effectiveness

  • In terms of program costs only, TEL was most cost-effective

  • In overall cost per client, moreover, TEL, which minimized client time, was least expensive ($571), STND was intermediate ($678), while RP remained most costly ($1665).

Brandeis University


  • TEL was economically superior to (i.e., dominated) the other approaches in generating better outcomes with less total resources.

  • Telephone-based counseling appears to be a highly cost-effective approach to continuing care (aftercare) in alcohol and cocaine dependent patients.

Brandeis University

  • Login