1 / 7

Critical Success Factors for system-of-system architecture / engineering

Critical Success Factors for system-of-system architecture / engineering. 25 October 2006 Neil Siegel Sector Vice-President, Technology Northrop Grumman Mission Systems. SoS design basics – one person’s view. Understand the work-flow and dynamic behavior of the system

traugott
Download Presentation

Critical Success Factors for system-of-system architecture / engineering

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Critical Success Factors for system-of-system architecture / engineering 25 October 2006 Neil Siegel Sector Vice-President, Technology Northrop Grumman Mission Systems

  2. SoS design basics – one person’s view • Understand the work-flow and dynamic behavior of the system • “Long mission threads” • Simultaneous operations • Capacity • Port-to-port timing • Etc. • Separate the implementation of the structure from the implementation of the “meat” • Exercise the structure at scale early and often • Design for allowed / unallowed dynamic behavior • “DC timing diagram” analogy • Establishing boundaries and linkages • Tight versus loose coupling • Where to use each A small number of abstractions (“views”) are helpful. Science + engineering + art. Simplicity is a virtue.

  3. Fitting the work to the distribution of skills in a real team • Implementation can vary significantly in complexity • In any large team, skill level across the team will vary significantly • Matching significantly improves the likelihood of a desirable outcome • Specific, tangible design steps to partition the design into “zones of pre-determined implementation complexity”

  4. Design for quality factors • We are better as an industry at designing for highly-visible factors (e.g., functionality) than for underlying quality attributes (e.g., MTBF) • Real-world practice seems to result in a huge variance in achieved quality • Probably an indication of an immature state-of-practice across our industry • Not clear if the underlying cause is lack of skill or lack of focus • A big killer of programs!

  5. Accept the limitations of our intuition • The relationship between improvement in a technical factor and improvement in observed system performance is not always obvious • Yet we all too often depend on intuition, or make use of hidden assumptions that do the same thing • Link technical predictors to operational predictors

  6. Integrating people into the system’s business process • Building successful system-of-systems is a process that must include a business-process-reengineering aspect • Understand the sociology of your user community, not just what they say • Perform a careful partitioning of what the human can do best, and what the computer can do best • Effective and credible • Don’t ask the human for data the computer can figure out • Support the stressed user • Crossing security domains

  7. Summary • At system-of-systems scale, things sometimes scale badly / non-intuitively • Unplanned dynamic behavior is the source of many of the hard problems • Not all people are equally skilled, so designs that are based on a tacit assumption that they are all equally skilled are risky • The large dynamic range of quality outcomes is a sign of immature state-of-practice Informing the system-of-systems design through domain knowledge seems essential

More Related