Last pre war days the final straw s
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 35

Last pre-war days: The final straw(s) PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 69 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Last pre-war days: The final straw(s). Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857). Had been slave in MO Moved with owner to IL & WI (free states) Lived there 4 years They returned to MO. Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857). Owner died in MO Inherited? Sued to officially receive freedom.

Download Presentation

Last pre-war days: The final straw(s)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Last pre war days the final straw s

Last pre-war days:The final straw(s)


Dred scott v sanford 1857

Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857)

  • Had been slave in MO

  • Moved with owner to IL & WI (free states)

    • Lived there 4 years

  • They returned to MO


Dred scott v sanford 18571

Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857)

  • Owner died in MO

  • Inherited?

  • Sued to officially receive freedom


Dred scott v sanford 18572

Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857)

  • CJ/SC Roger Taney ruled:

    • Slaves didn’t have rights of citizens

    • Case couldn’t be heard in a slave state court


Dred scott v sanford 18573

Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857)

  • CJ/SC Roger Taney ruled:

    • MO Comp (1820) unconstitutional

    • If owner moves to “free state”, can’t be forced to give up property


Reaction to dred scott

Reaction to Dred Scott

  • Taney thought he was settling slavery issue

  • President James Buchanan:

    • To their decision, in common with all good citizens, I shall cheerfully submit… (A)ll agree that under the Constitution slavery in the States is beyond the reach of any human power except that of the respective States themselves


1857 lecompton const

1857 – Lecompton Const

  • Proslavery Kansans had won original vote to set up state gov

  • 1857 – state gov asked Congress to admit KS as a slave state


1857 lecompton const1

1857 – Lecompton Const

  • Abolitionists asked for a referendum on slavery

    • 90% of people in Kansas against slavery by then

  • State gov refused referendum (they knew they’d lose)


1857 lecompton const2

1857 – Lecompton Const

  • Pres Buchanan (D) backed Lecompton government

    • He owed the south for his election

  • Stephen Douglas (also D) disagreed – popular sovereignty

    • He didn’t care who won, just wanted them to vote


1858 lincoln vs douglas

1858 – Lincoln vs. Douglas

  • Race for Senate from IL

  • Stephen Douglas (D)

    • Incumbent Senator

  • Abraham Lincoln (R)

    • Unknown lawyer


1858 lincoln vs douglas1

1858 – Lincoln vs. Douglas

  • Lincoln challenged Douglas to 7 debates all over IL

    • Many people came to watch them


Douglas s argument

Douglas’s argument

  • Popular sovereignty in territories was important

  • Slavery might die out on its own

  • Slavery not immoral, just backward and unnecessary in plains states


Lincoln s argument

Lincoln’s argument

  • Slavery is immoral – based on greed

  • Popular sovereignty not enough –must pass laws to limit slavery


Freeport doctrine

Freeport doctrine

  • Lincoln trying to say popular sovereignty wouldn’t work

    • Asked what if settlers of a territory vote down slavery

      • Dred Scott decision said you couldn’t ban slavery


Freeport doctrine1

Freeport doctrine

  • Douglas replied that if local cops didn’t enforce slave laws

  • It didn’t matter what the law was, b/c locals determine what laws would be enforced


1858 lincoln vs douglas2

1858 – Lincoln vs. Douglas

  • Douglas won Senate seat

  • BUT:

    • people began to notice Lincoln


1859 harper s ferry va

1859 – Harper’s Ferry, VA

  • John Brown led 21 abolitionists

  • Raided US arsenal for weapons

  • Planning massive slave revolts


1859 harper s ferry va1

1859 – Harper’s Ferry, VA

  • Took 60 wealthy locals hostage

    • Hoped their slaves would revolt

    • They didn’t


1859 harper s ferry va2

1859 – Harper’s Ferry, VA

  • Finally captured by US Marines

  • Brown convicted of treason, sentenced to die by hanging


Reaction to john brown

Reaction to John Brown

  • In north:

    • Martyr for freedom

  • In south:

    • Mobs attacked people suspected to be abolitionists

    • Secession talk increased


1860 republican convention

1860 Republican convention

  • William Seward expected to be the nominee

    • Strong abolitionist

    • Govof NY – very powerful

    • Made lots of political enemies


1860 republican convention1

1860 Republican convention

  • Abraham Lincoln

    • More moderate about slavery

      • Said he didn’t intend to interfere with southern slavery

    • Unknown, so few enemies

  • Republicans selected Lincoln


1860 democrats

1860 Democrats

  • North & south couldn’t agree on one candidate

  • North – Stephen Douglas (IL)

  • South – John Breckenridge (KY)


Constitutional union party

Constitutional Union Party

  • Minor party for this election

  • Moderates from across the country

  • Ignored the issue of slavery

  • Just wanted to keep US together


1860 election

1860 election

Abraham Lincoln (R, IL) – Stephen Douglas (D, IL)

John Breckenridge (SD, KY) – John Bell (CU, TN)


1860 election1

1860 election


Secession

Secession

  • Lincoln’s election scared the south

    • Feared north would oppress them

  • South Carolina seceded first

    • December 20, 1860

      • 2½ months before Lincoln inaugurated


Secession1

Secession

  • MS was next to secede

  • Then FL, AL, GA, LA & TX

  • Other southern states didn’t secede until after war started


The states of the csa

The states of the CSA

  • Only 11 states ended up seceding

  • 4 slave states didn’t secede at all

    • MO, KY, MD, DE

    • All had very few slaves

    • Economic ties to northern states

    • Lincoln promised US wouldn’t free slaves in states that remained loyal


Legal issues

Legal issues

  • Secession decision based on:

    • USA compact between states, not government above the states

    • States can leave peacefully

    • States’ rights must be guaranteed


Previously threatened secessions

Previously threatened secessions

  • Northerners:

    • Hartford Convention (1814-15)

  • Southerners:

    • Debate over slavery (1790)

    • Missouri crisis (1820)

    • Nullification crisis (1832)

    • California crisis (1850)


Confederate states of america

Confederate States of America

  • Formed Feb 1861

  • Copied US Constitution, but:

    • Protected states’ rights

    • Guaranteed slavery

    • Referenced God

    • Prohibited protective tariffs


Jefferson davis

Jefferson Davis

  • President of the Confederate States of America

  • Was US Senator from Mississippi


  • Login