1 / 62

What’s New in Poo

What’s New in Poo. A lighthearted review of the use of human feces for the diagnosis and treatment of human gastrointestinal illnesses from the tainted viewpoint of a warped Microbiologist. SOMC Grand Rounds January 6, 2012 Timothy R. Cassity, Ph. D. Microbiologist.

torin
Download Presentation

What’s New in Poo

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. What’s New in Poo A lighthearted review of the use of human feces for the diagnosis and treatment of human gastrointestinal illnesses from the tainted viewpoint of a warped Microbiologist SOMC Grand Rounds January 6, 2012 Timothy R. Cassity, Ph. D. Microbiologist

  2. Sorry Winnie, this presentation is about poo, not Pooh

  3. Diagnostic Use of Stool • Symptomatic patients – GI complaints • Most of related to an infectious etiology • Asymptomatic patients • Most of screening for potential colon cancers

  4. Symptomatic • Most common symptom is diarrhea • Lower GI tract • Dyspepsia, pain, etc • Upper GI tract

  5. What’s not very new • Routine stool culture • Useful for Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, and Escherichia coli O157 infections

  6. What’s not very new • Routine stool culture • Misses some strains of enteropathogenic or enterotoxigenic E. coli.

  7. Campylobacter EIA • An enzyme immunoassay is being evaluated at SOMC for the detection of Campylobacter species. • Can be done in < 30 minutes (culture takes 2 – 3 days) • Only need one per patient per illness • Slightly more sensitive than culture

  8. Shiga-Toxin EIA • An enzyme immunoassay is being evaluated for the detection of shiga toxin-producing strains of E. coli • Requires 16 – 40 hours (culture takes 2 – 3 days) • Only need one per patient per illness

  9. Shiga-Toxin EIA • An enzyme immunoassay is being evaluated for the detection of shiga toxin-producing strains of E. coli • Significantly more sensitive than culture • Detects enterotoxigenic E. coli other than O157 (increases sensitivity about 50%)

  10. What’s not very new • Routine Ova and Parasite Exam • Very low yield with immunocompetent patients with no travel history

  11. What’s not very new • Routine Ova and Parasite Exam • Useful for patients with unexplained anemia (Strongyloides stercoralis)

  12. What’s not very new • Routine Ova and Parasite Exam • Ascaris lumbricoides found in rare instances.

  13. SOMC Ova and Parasite

  14. Cryptosporidium/Giardia lamblia DFA • Direct fluorescent antibody for Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum. • Can be done in less than 1 hour • Much more sensitive for finding these organisms, particularly Cryptosporidium, than traditional ova and parasite exam.

  15. Parasites – Recommended Algorithm • Order only Giardia lamblia/Cryptosporidium DFA on a single stool specimen on patients over 12 years old unless the patient is anemic, immunosuppressed or has a significant travel history.

  16. Clostridium difficile

  17. Clostridium difficile • An anaerobic, spore-forming gram positive bacillus, found mostly in the GI tract of mammals. • Both toxin-producing and non-toxin-producing strains exist • C. difficile culture alone not useful -detects both types

  18. Clostridium difficile • Both toxin-producing and non-toxin-producing strains exist • GDH (Glutamate dehydrogenase) detects C. difficile, but detects both types • GDH can be used to rule out C. difficile, but not definitively diagnose it.

  19. Clostridium difficile • Toxigenic culture (Reference Method) • Very sensitive and specific • Culture C. difficile, then test isolate that is cultured for toxin production or toxin genes • Good academically, not useful clinically • Requires 2 or more days to a negative result, 3 days to positive result

  20. Clostridium difficile • Up until the last 2 years, most clinical labs used (and >90% still do) C. difficile toxin tests (either toxin A, or toxin A & B combined)

  21. Clostridium difficile • Present day “state of the art” testing is an amplified DNA probe for a unique genomic region found only in the toxigenic strains.

  22. Clostridium difficile • Our experience with amplified probe: • Increased sensitivity, 29% better than C. difficile toxin testing • Correlates well (>95% agreement) with toxigenic culture, the recognized reference method.

  23. Clostridium difficile • Potential shortcomings of amplified DNA probes: • Excellent sensitivity – can detect as few as 16 C. difficile toxin gene copies per 50 microliters of stool • Must correlate with clinical information! • Presence of C. difficile does not confirm a diagnosis of C. difficile-associated disease.

  24. Clostridium difficile • Potential shortcomings of amplified DNA probes: • Toxigenic C. difficile is found in many people who have no symptoms

  25. Clostridium difficile • Potential shortcomings of amplified DNA probes: • Only method FDA approved for pediatrics, but remember children under 2 years of age have a high carriage rate, up to 50%.

  26. Clostridium difficile • Specimen requirements • Specimens only accepted on symptomatic patients (i.e. diarrhea stool) • Rejected for testing: • Rattler’s • Formed stool • Stick Test negative (applicator stick stands)

  27. Clostridium difficile • Specimen requirements • Specimens only accepted on symptomatic patients (i.e. diarrhea stool) • Acceptable specimens: • Liquid stool (takes shape of container) • Stick Test Positive (applicator stick falls)

  28. Clostridium difficile • Specimen requirements • Because sensitivity is >95%, no more than 1 specimen needed • One specimen per patient per week, unless approved by the Microbiologist or Pathologist

  29. Clostridium difficile • Specimen requirements • No lab test is indicated for “test of cure.” Resolution of diarrhea is sufficient.

  30. Clostridium difficile - Treatment • Adequate treatment involves two dimensions • Eradication of toxin-producing C. difficile • Re-growth of normal bowel flora (particularly anaerobic flora)

  31. Clostridium difficile - Treatment • Eradication of toxin-producing C. difficile • Metronidazole not effective for moderate to severe cases • Kills C. difficile OK, but kills anaerobic GI flora better • Treatment effective initially, but recurrence common

  32. Clostridium difficile - Treatment • Eradication of toxin-producing C. difficile • Oral vancomycin is the agent of choice • Less toxic to normal GI anaerobes • A taper regimen is preferable – antibiotics kill only vegetative cells. • Longer coverage is necessary to control germinating spores • Longer coverage is necessary to allow re-growth of normal anaerobic GNRs.

  33. Clostridium difficile - Treatment • Fidaxomycin • Less toxic to normal bowel flora than metronidazole or vancomycin • Compared to vancomycin 125 mg qid x 10 to 14 days, fidaxomycin had a lower relapse rate. • Expensive – standard course of therapy approximately $2,800 (wholesale price)

  34. Clostridium difficile - Treatment • Re-growth of normal bowel flora (particularly anaerobic flora) • Will re-grow eventually if not assaulted • In recurrences more aggressive replacement is necessary

  35. Clostridium difficile - Treatment • Re-growth of normal bowel flora (particularly anaerobic flora) • Stool transplant is effective in >90% of cases • Stool transplant involves a lot of testing of donor stool (which takes several days to complete), and is not aesthetically pleasing • “Synthetic” stool developed for this purpose

  36. Therapeutic Use of Human Feces

  37. Fecal Transplant • Used primarily to treat Cl. Difficile associated disease

  38. Fecal Transplant • How they are performed:

  39. Fecal Transplant • How they are performed: • Obtain approximately 200 – 300 grams of feces from a close, healthy donor

  40. Fecal Transplant • How they are performed: • Donor stool is screened for: • Typical and atypical enteric pathogens (stool culture, Y. enterocolitica, A. hydrophila, and others) • Ova and parasites • The donor is screened serologically for: • Hepatitis A, B, and C • HIV-1 and HIV-2 • Syphilis

  41. Fecal Transplant • How they are performed: • The recipient is screened for: • Hepatitis A, B, and C • HIV-1 and HIV-2

  42. Fecal Transplant • How they are performed: • Recipient is treated with oral vancomycin 500 mg bid for 3 – 4 days (to kill vegetative C. difficile cells)

  43. Fecal Transplant • How they are performed: • If donor stool is suitable, 200 – 300 grams of donor feces is blended with 200 – 300 mL of saline to make a slurry • Donor stool slurry is filtered through a coffee filter to remove particulate matter

  44. Fecal Transplant • How they are performed: • Donor stool is “implanted” in the recipient via as nasogastric tube, colonoscope, or enema.

  45. Fecal Transplant • Stool transplants are effective in >90% of cases • Used only for patients with recurrences • average duration of C. difficile in study was 11 months • 77 patients studied • 70 (91%) resolved within 6 days of treatment Reference: Shefchik, C. 2011. Clostridium Difficile Treated By Fecal Microbiota Transplant. Presented at the American College of Gastroenterology's 76th Annual Scientific Meeting, Oct. 28-Nov. 2 in Washington, D.C

  46. Stools and Asymptomatic Patients

  47. Asymptomatic Patients • Most tests are methods of screening for GI bleeding or potential colon cancer • Tests that detect GI bleeding • Tests that detect genetic changes associated with cancer cells

  48. Hemocult (guaiac) Testing • Traditional test for occult blood • Easy to do • Inexpensive • Sensitivity • Many interfering substances • Dietary changes may be necessary before collecting stool specimen

  49. Immunochromatographic Testing for Human Hemoglobin (FOBT) • Traditional test for occult blood • Easy to do, but more expensive than Hemocult • Sensitivity much better (approximately 300 X) than Hemocult • Few or interfering substances • Dietary changes not necessary before collecting stool specimen

  50. Comparison of iFOBT and Hemocult

More Related