October 2006
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 26

Florida Health Insurance Plan High Risk Pool PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 44 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Mercer Oliver Wyman Actuarial Consulting, Inc. October 2006. Florida Health Insurance Plan High Risk Pool. Karen Bender Milwaukee. Florida Health Insurance Plan (FHIP). 2003 Legislation – start a new high risk program

Download Presentation

Florida Health Insurance Plan High Risk Pool

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


October 2006

Mercer Oliver Wyman

Actuarial Consulting, Inc.

October 2006

Florida Health Insurance PlanHigh Risk Pool

Karen Bender

Milwaukee


Florida health insurance plan fhip

Florida Health Insurance Plan (FHIP)

  • 2003 Legislation – start a new high risk program

  • Engaged Mercer Oliver Wyman U.S. Actuarial Consulting (MOW) to perform feasibility study

  • One aspect of the feasibility study was to analyze the impact the high risk pool will have on the market (if any)


Background

Background

Florida Comprehensive Health Association (FCHA)

  • Formerly known as State Comprehensive Health Association

  • High Risk Pool

  • Closed to new enrollment in October 1990

  • 1990 Data

    • Premium $15 million

    • Claims $47 million

    • Assessment $34 million


Background1

Background

Unique Circumstances in Florida that

Facilitated Impact Analysis

  • HIPAA Requirements

  • Florida DOI issued data request

  • Florida requires rates be filed and approved before using

  • Florida has certain routine reporting requirements


Florida hipaa compliance

Florida HIPAA Compliance

3 Prong Approach

Small Group

Carriers

Individual

Carriers

Group

Carriers


Florida hipaa compliance1

Florida HIPAA Compliance

  • Carriers in Individual (Nongroup) Market

    • Applicable only to HIPAA-qualified Individuals leaving Self-funded Plans

    • Must guarantee issue their two most popular currently marketed plans


Florida hipaa compliance2

Florida HIPAA Compliance

  • Small Group Carriers

    • Required to guarantee issue to self-employed each August

    • Premiums cannot exceed 150% of Standard Risk Rates

    • DOI determines Standard Risk Rates

      • Based upon average rate charged by nongroup carriers representing 80% of the nongroup market


Florida hipaa compliance3

Florida HIPAA Compliance

  • Group Carriers

    • Must issue conversion contracts

    • Benefits determined by Florida regulators

    • Premiums cannot exceed 200% of Standard Risk Rates

    • Same Standard Risk Rates (adj. for benefits) as used for G.I. for one-life groups by small group carriers


Florida hipaa compliance4

Florida HIPAA Compliance

  • Individual Carriers

  • Small Group Carriers

  • Group Carriers

    High Risk Pool Would Eliminate These HIPAA Compliance Requirements

  • What will impact be on rates (if any)?


Florida doi data request

Florida DOI Data Request

  • Issued to Individual (Nongroup) and Small Group Carriers

    • Experience for one-life and HIPAA-qualified individuals vs. small group and medically underwritten groups

    • Impact of removing several requirements

    • 19 carriers (including HMOs) participated


Results

Results

  • Segregated by HIPAA Compliance

    • Individual Carriers

    • Small Group Carriers

    • Group Carriers

  • Impact Segregated between Claim Cost and Administrative Costs


Results1

Results

  • HIPAA Experience for Individual Carriers


Results2

Results

  • HIPAA Experience for Individual Carriers

    Nongroup Carrier Losses Attributable to HIPAA


Hipaa experience for individual carriers

HIPAA Experience for Individual Carriers

  • Losses as a % of 2003 Premium

    • Range 1.2% to 2.2%

    • Carriers will still incur losses on existing HIPAA individuals unless they would be allowed to immediately transfer them to the high risk pool

    • Over long run, premiums decrease 1.2% to 2.2%


Results3

Results

  • Responses from Carriers

If we ignore the carriers that did not provide an estimate, the weighted

average (based upon lives) is about a 3% reduction in nongroup premiums.


Individual carrier responses

Individual Carrier Responses

  • Administrative Savings

    • Carriers indicated would be minimal, 0.0% to 0.5% of premium

    • Appeared conservative

    • MOW estimated 1.0% savings


Small group carriers

Small Group Carriers

  • GI One-Life Groups Experience vs. Groups 2-50 EEs


Small group carriers1

Small Group Carriers

  • Incurred Losses Attributable to One-Life Groups

Reason losses decreased in 2003, companies allowed to increase rates from

115% to 150% of Standard Risk Rates


Small group carriers2

Small Group Carriers

  • One-Life Groups

    • Losses on previous slide understated

      • Expressed as a % of 2003 Premium Levels for technical reasons

      • Removing GI for one-life group could reduce small group premiums by 2.0% to 3.0% in the long run


Small group carriers3

Small Group Carriers

  • Responses from Carriers

    • Mixed

    • 9 carriers indicated no change in premiums if G.I. of one-life groups removed

    • Several indicated they could not determine impact

    • Some carriers indicated they had insufficient membership to generate credible results

    • Missed opportunity


Small group carriers4

Small Group Carriers

  • Administrative Savings

    • Elimination of open enrollment

    • Reduced marketing costs resulting from elimination of open enrollment forms, etc.

    • More streamlined regulatory reporting requirements

    • Higher administrative costs associated with billing, accounting, customer service of one-life groups


Small group carriers5

Small Group Carriers

  • Administrative Savings

    • Carrier’s responses mixed; no numerical estimates

    • MOW estimated 1% premium savings in the long run


Group carriers

Group Carriers

  • Current HIPAA Compliance Requirement

    • Conversion Plans

    • State defined benefits

    • 200% Standard Risk Rate

  • Florida DOI has 2002 Group Conversions Statistics:

    • Actual loss ratio for 8 largest insurance companies – 211%

    • $58.4 million losses (Assumes 85% breakdown loss ratio)

    • Losses represent 0.5% of group premium


Group carriers1

Group Carriers

Potential Premium Savings

*The reason that Elimination of Group Conversion (0.5% of premium) has what appears to be a greater

dollar amount of impact proportionally than the elimination of one-life groups is that elimination of group

conversion impacts the premium for all fully insured group sizes, whereas the elimination of one-life

groups impacts the premium for only small groups.


Conclusions

Conclusions

  • Impact on Previous Slide

    • Does not consider impact of assessments

    • Critical to create broadest base possible for assessments

      • Self-funded

      • Provider

    • Small base for assessments could negate savings


Fhip analysis

FHIP Analysis

  • Most comprehensive impact analysis MOW has observed

  • Sources of data critical

  • Legislation failed

    • Critical issue was funding


  • Login