Emanuel county schools focus on data to improve performance
Download
1 / 55

Emanuel County Schools Focus on Data to Improve Performance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 94 Views
  • Uploaded on

Emanuel County Schools Focus on Data to Improve Performance. 2009 System AYP Report (July). AYP consequences are based on the July AYP Report. Emanuel County AYP Report July 2009 Over view. Emanuel – CRCT Math July 2009. Emanuel – CRCT Reading/Eng. Lang. Arts.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Emanuel County Schools Focus on Data to Improve Performance' - toby


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Emanuel county schools focus on data to improve performance

Emanuel County SchoolsFocus on Data toImprove Performance


2009 system ayp report july

2009 System AYP Report(July)

AYP consequences are based on the

July AYP Report.


Emanuel county ayp report july 2009 over view

Emanuel County AYP Report July 2009 Over view








Ayp status summary
AYP Status Summary

SPS – Met AYP

SES – NI1 (R/ELA – SWD)

SMS – NI1 (Math & R/ELA – SWD)

SHS – NI6 (ELA - Black & SWD – Graduation Rate)

ASPA – Did Not Meet (Math – Econ. Disadvantage)

TCE – Met AYP

ECI – Did Not Meet ( CRCT Math – Black)(Grad. Rate – All students) (GHSGT Math – All Students & Econ. Disadv.) (GHSGT ELA – Econ. Disadv.)


Emanuel georgia ayp c omparison

Emanuel & Georgia AYP Comparison



Emanuel county 3 year comparison ayp report by subgroup

Emanuel County3-Year ComparisonAYP Report by Subgroup



Ayp 3 year comparison system crct reading language arts

AYP 3-Year Comparison - System CRCT Reading / Language Arts



Ayp 3 year comparison system ghsgt english language arts

AYP 3-Year Comparison - System GHSGT English Language Arts


Ayp 3 year comparison system second indicator attendance

AYP 3-Year Comparison - System Second Indicator - Attendance


Ayp 3 year comparison system second indicator graduation rate

AYP 3-Year Comparison - System Second Indicator – Graduation Rate


How to plan for better results with the data available

How to PlanforBetter Resultswith theData Available


Data available on mygadoe

Data Available on MyGaDOE

Step 2 – AYP Reports

Step 1 – MyGaDoe Login


Step 3 – Select School – View Report

Step 4 – Academic Performance – AYP Indicator


Step 5

Select Download

Step 6

Download File


Step 7 – Save file and open

Caution – Sensitive Information

Step 8 – Open File


Step 9 – Yes to accept format

Click on the “Second Indicator” for additional information.


The data

The Data

Grade Level

Gender

Race

Date of Birth

SWD

ELL

ESOL

Retained information

FAY status

Days absent

Test data

9th Grade Enter Date

. . . plus more


AMO

Annual Measureable Objectives







Data analysis
Data Analysis

Get ready – what do you know already?

Identify areas for comparison.

Examine trends and relationships.

Identify and define problem areas.

Develop intervention strategies.

Evaluate – plan progress monitoring (benchmark testing) to determine the effectiveness of intervention strategies.


Trends
Trends

Has one area been consistently weak over the past three years?

Has one area been consistently strong every year?

Do there appear to be relationships between data?

Do there appear to be relationships between student performance and instructional practices . . . teacher experience . . . class size?

Are there patterns with grades levels?


Identify inconsistencies
Identify Inconsistencies

Identify test scores inconsistent with the course grade.

Identify large score discrepancies in a particular area from year to year?

Are there any surprises in the data?

Identify score discrepancies between teaching teams or teachers?


Strategies obtainable sustainable solutions within our control
StrategiesObtainable / sustainable solutions within our control.

What intervention strategies are being used or planned already?

What would yield the most immediate results or changes?

What factors are in our control?


Tomorrow s session
Tomorrow’s Session

  • Share and discuss your AYP report

  • Discuss trends identified for your school

  • What are the implications?

  • Share strategies and solutions for improvement this upcoming year.

Each school will report out their information.


Analyze the data
Analyze the Data

SPS

  • 2009 CRCT Scores from 3rd Grade (SMS)

  • 2008 CRCT Scores from 2nd Grade (SPS)

  • 2009 CRCT Scores 1st & 2nd Grade (SPS)

    SES

  • 2008 CRCT Scores 2nd Grade (SPS)

  • 2009 CRCT Scores 2nd Grade (SPS) – preparation for 2010

  • 2009 CRCT Scores 3rd – 5th Grade (SES)

    TCE

  • 2009 CRCT Scores 1st – 5th Grade (TCE)

  • 2008 CRCT Scores 1st – 5th Grade (TCE)


Analyze the data1
Analyze the Data

ASPA

  • 2009 CRCT Scores 1st – 8th (ASPA)

  • 2008 CRCT Scores 1st – 8th (ASPA)

    SMS

  • 2008 CRCT Scores 5th Grade (SES)

  • 2009 CRCT Scores 5th Grade (SES) – preparation for 2010

  • 2009 CRCT Scores 6th – 8th Grade (SMS)


Analyze the data2
Analyze the Data

ECI

  • 2009 CRCT Scores 5th Grade (TCE) – preparation for 2010

  • 2009 CRCT Scores 6th – 8th Grade (ECI)

  • 2008 CRCT Scores 6th – 8th Grade (ECI)

  • 2006 CRCT Scores 8th Grade (ECI) – compare failures with 2009 GHSGT

  • 2009 GHSGT Scores

    EOCTs – predictor for GHSGT success

  • EOCT scores – compared to state/RESA

  • EOCT scores – analyze by subject areas

  • EOCT scores – analyze by teacher


Analyze the data3
Analyze the Data

SHS

  • 2009 CRCT Scores 8th Grade (SMS) – preparation for 2010

  • 2009 CRCT Scores 8th Grade (ASPA) – preparation for 2010

  • 2006 CRCT Scores 8th Grade (SMS) – compare failures with 2009 GHSGT

  • 2009 GHSGT Scores

    EOCTs – predictor for GHSGT success

  • EOCT scores – compared to state/RESA

  • EOCT scores – analyze by subject areas

  • EOCT scores – analyze by teacher


Data resources
Data Resources

  • Assistant Principals will have access to folder on their desktop with test results and other data.

  • GaDOE

  • If you need additional data, please let us know and we will work to get you the information you need.


ad