1 / 30

Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana - Gramin

Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana - Gramin. Meeting with Principal Secretaries / Secretaries. 22 nd April , 2017. PMAY-G. PMAY-G. Points of Discussion. PMAY-G – Target, State Share. 1. Performance under PMAY-G. 2. Mason Training. 3. House Design Typologies. 4.

tklein
Download Presentation

Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana - Gramin

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pradhan MantriAwaasYojana - Gramin Meeting with Principal Secretaries / Secretaries 22nd April, 2017

  2. PMAY-G PRC – January 2017

  3. PMAY-G Points of Discussion • PMAY-G – Target, State Share 1 • Performance under PMAY-G 2 • Mason Training 3 • House Design Typologies 4 Meeting with States

  4. Annual PMAY-G Physical Target 1 Meeting with States

  5. Annual Financial Implication 1 Additionally, nearly Rs. 30,000 crore would be available through convergence with MGNREGA in three years. Meeting with States

  6. Release of State Matching Share 1 • States which are yet to be release State matching share for 2016-17 as per AwaasSoft. • Himachal Pradesh • Jammu & Kashmir • Maharashtra • Manipur • Mizoram • Meghalaya • Nagaland • Odisha • Punjab • Sikkim • Rajasthan • Uttar Pradesh (partially released) • Telangana Meeting with States

  7. Sanction of house to Beneficiaries 2 Mapping of villages & SECC data verification by Gram Sabha Target Setting By States Registration Uploading of geo-tagged photographs using AwaasApp • Mobile No • Bank A/c N • Aadhaar No. • Existing dwelling unit • Site for construction SANCTION Meeting with States

  8. Mapping of Villages with SECC Data 2 Unmapped Villages with SECC Data vs Total Villages with SECC Data States with unmapped SECC villages Meeting with States ** As on 18/04/2017 from AwaasSoft

  9. Identification and Selection of Beneficiaries 2 Process Flow Progress 1 Circulation of GP wise list of eligible beneficiaries Target Date for Finalising Permanent Waitlist 15/July/2016 2 Verification of Lists by Gram Sabha • Universe for PMAY-G is 4.03 crore households, identified through Socio Economic Caste Census (SECC), 2011 data. • After verification of 3.92 crore households by Gram Sabha and review by Appellate Authority, 2.39 crorebeneficiaries have been identified to be eligible to receive assistance under PMAY-G. 3 Constitution of Appellate Committee 4 Resolution of Grievances by Appellate Committee 5 Uploading and Publication of Permanent Wait list on AwaasSoft PRC – July 2016

  10. Household Verification by Gram Sabhas 2 Percentage of households verified using SECC 2011 More than 70 % 50 -70 % 30 – 50 % Upto 30 % Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Karnataka and Telangana are yet to start verification of households from the SECC list

  11. Targets fixed by States 2 Target set by State vs MoRD Target States with 100% Targets set States having less than 100% Targets set Chattisgarh Gujarat Himachal Pradesh Madhya Pradesh Jammu & Kashmir Kerala Meghalaya Punjab Tamil Nadu Rajasthan Uttarakhand West Bengal Karnataka Meeting with States ** As on 18/04/2017 from AwaasSoft

  12. Registrations Completed by States 2 Beneficiaries Registered vs MoRD Target States with over 60% Registration Progress of Remaining States on Registrations Rajasthan Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Chattisgarh West Bengal Odisha Himachal Pradesh Jharkhand Uttarakhand Gujarat Uttar Pradesh Kerala Haryana Meeting with States ** As on 18/04/2017 from AwaasSoft

  13. Status of Geo-tagging 2 Beneficiaries Geo-tagged vis-a-visMoRD Target 70 - 90 % 50 – 70 % Upto 50 % More than 90 %

  14. Houses Sanctioned 2 Houses Sanctioned vs MoRD Target States with over 70% Houses Sanctioned States with Less Than 70% Houses Sanctioned Himachal Pradesh Madhya Pradesh West Bengal Rajasthan Odisha Maharashtra Chattisgarh Jharkhand Meeting with States ** As on 18/04/2017 from AwaasSoft

  15. 1st Instalment Paid 2 Percentage of beneficiaries receiving 1st instalment vis-a-visMoRD Target 30 - 50 % 10 – 30 % Upto 10 % More than 50 %

  16. Program Management Unit in States 2 • Suggested constitution • State • State Nodal officer • Technical Expert in the field of construction of house • Expert to look after IT/MIS/PFMS • Expert to look after all the Financial matters • Social Mobilisation expert and Training Coordinator • District • Coordinator for all the activities of PMAY-G at District • IT Personnel • Training Coordinator • Block • Coordinator for all the activities of PMAY at Block & Village level • Every house of PMAY-G to be tagged to village level functionary. Maharashtra and Jharkhand 1 State level PMU to be setup At State Level 2 PMU at all levels -UP, Bihar, Kerala and Haryana, State and District Level in Tripura District PMUs to be setup 3 Block / Block level Panchayat PMUs to be setup Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Karnataka 4 Have dedicated organizations, viz. Housing Corporations, which look into all the aspects of rural housing Every PMAY-G house to be tagged to a village functionary to monitor completion PRC – July 2016

  17. Mason Training 3 Process Flow Time lines agreed to in 2016 1 Engaging a Training Provider in consultation with CSDCI 2 Training of trainer Pilot trainings taken up in Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand, Gujarat, Rajasthan and Maharashtra 3 Pilot training of mason 4 Scaling up training for the State 5 Assessment and certification of masons PRC – July 2016

  18. Mason Training 3 TARGET 40,000 Masons by June 2017 Target Under Mason Training Meeting with States

  19. Mason Training 3 • Rs. 15 Lakhs has been released to 21 States for conducting pilot training of masons. • The pilot training of masons had been conducted in the States of Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand, Gujarat, Rajasthan and Maharashtra. • The remaining states to conduct pilot training . • All states to scale up training for the entire state based on experiences in the pilot. • States may submit proposal for gap funding for organizing training with sufficient justification. Meeting with States

  20. Housing Design Typologies 4 Progress Process Flow 18 States 1 UNDP – 13 IIT Delhi - 5 Studies to be conducted in 34 States/UTs Remaining 16 to be taken up this year Studies in 18 States already taken up Typology study 2 Preliminary design type Typology studies conducted in 3 Presentation to Ministry House Design Typologies have been finalized in 14 States (Assam, Chhattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Odisha, Rajasthan, Tripura, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Mizoram, Sikkim, Uttarakhand) 4 State consultation State consultations remaining in 4 States Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Jammu & Kashmir 5 Final design Demo houses taken up in Tripura And Maharashtra 6 Demo building PRC – July 2016

  21. House Design Typologies 4 Compendium of House Design Typologies released by Honorable PM Activities Required at the STATES’ End 1 Construction of Demo Houses 2 Incorporation of Alternate Technologies in SOR 3 Wide publicity to Designs among Beneficiaries Meeting with States

  22. House Design Typologies 4 Progress Tracker Meeting with States

  23. Challenges and policy issues • Identification – Mapping of revenue villages to SECC village, beneficiaries to villages, deletion of ineligibe households, addition of eligible households left out of list, wrong capturing of category in SECC, Addressing of grievances through Appellate Mechanism. • Land to landless • PFMS– Bank account verification, tracking of FTOs, Pending transfer of assistance, False success / reject cases. • Mason Training – Identification of Training Provider, Conduct of pilot training, scaling of training, linking of trained masons to the beneficiaries.

  24. Challenges and policy issues • Quality– Ensuring quality in construction of house, availability of material at reasonable rates, use of locally available materials • Awareness to beneficiaries – about the scheme, eligibility, house designs, quality construction material, loan to willing beneficiaries. • Monitoring – Setting up of PMU at different levels, Geo-tagging, disposal of grievances • House designs – Identification, construction of demo houses, Penetration / adoption of identified house designs

  25. IAY PRC – January 2017

  26. IAY Points of Discussion 1 • Completion of incomplete IAY Houses in 2016-17 1.1 • States with Higher Completion Rates 1.2 • States with High incomplete houses PRC 2017: PMAY-G

  27. IAY Progress in FY 2016-17 States with Highest completion in 2016-17 States with Largest number of incomplete houses as on 31.3.17 Bihar – 5.76 lakhs Bihar - 4.09 Lakhs * Total Incomplete Houses 36,39,368 UP- 4.58 lakhs Maharashtra – 1.83 Lakhs * As on 1/4/2016 * Total Houses Completed 25,42,648 WB- 3.70 lakhs Assam – 1.44 Lakhs * As on 21/04/2017 From AwaasSoft MP- 2.54 lakhs Karnataka – 1.06 Lakhs Assam- 1.82 lakh Rajasthan – 0.96 Lakhs Houses Completed as per reports of States (status to be updated on AwaasSoft as these could not be uploaded due to IT/Network issues.) 32,14,506 Jharkhand- 1.15 lakh Gujarat – 0.66 Lakhs Meeting with States

  28. % Completed IAY Houses (As on 20.04.2017) Houses Completed vs Houses Sanctioned from 2013-2016 More than 90 % 70 -90 % 50 – 70 % Upto 50 %

  29. % Incomplete IAY Houses (20.04.2017) Incomplete Houses Remaining vs Houses Sanctioned from 2013-2016 More than 70 % 40 – 70 % 20 – 40 % Upto 20 %

  30. Thank you…

More Related