HARMONICOP

1. HARMONICOP HARMONIzing COllaborative Planning

2. MAIN OBJECTIVE The main objective of the HarmoniCOP project is to increase the understanding of participatory river basin management in Europe. It aims to generate practically useful information about and improve the scientific base of social learning in river basin management and support the implementation of the public participation provisions of the Water Framework Directive

3. PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION Public and stakeholder participation refers to the active involvement of individual citizens, individual companies, public interest groups and economic interest groups in decision making. Communication and information flows are important aspects of PP. Information and communication tools are of major importance.

4. SOCIAL LEARNING It is argued here that transformation and change, and processes of social learning are of major importance if the sustainability of current resource management regimes is to be improved. However, the theoretical base for social learning is still fragmented. This must be attributed to the fact that an interdisciplinary, system-oriented approach is missing in the social sciences.

5. SOCIAL LEARNING Social learning is based on the idea that social change requires • critical self-reflection, • the development of participatory, multi-scale, democratic processes, • reflexive capabilities of individuals and societies, • the capacity of social movements to shape the political and economic boundary conditions towards improvement of the current situation.

6. SOCIAL LEARNING Social learning with respect to sustainable development is based on the participatory processes of social change and societal transformations with the aim of • making clear the goals and stakes that are involved in transformation processes, • achieve better (because democratic) solutions to environmental problems, • thus fostering the implementation of measures that have been agreed upon, • and better manage conflicts.

7. ELEMENTS OF SOCIAL LEARNING 1 Processes of social learning should contain the following elements • Build up a shared problem perception in a group of actors, in particular when the problem is largely ill-defined (this does not imply consensus building). • Build trust as base for a critical self-reflection, which implies recognition of individual mental frames and images and how they pertain to decision making.

8. ELEMENTS OF SOCIAL LEARNING 2 • Recognize mutual dependencies and interactions in the actor network. • Reflect on assumptions about the dynamics and cause-effect relationships in the system to be managed. • Reflect on subjective valuation schemes. • Engage in collective decision- and learning processes (this may include the development of new management strategies, and the introduction of new formal and informal rules).

9. INNOVATION 1 • HarmoniCOP will give a comprehensive overview and analysis of the state of art in the participatory RBMP in Europe, using a social learning perspective. • HarmoniCOP will address the scale issue in PP and RBMP in a systematic way.

10. INNOVATION 2 • HarmoniCOP will approach information and information tools as a means for social learning in participatory RBMP. • HarmoniCOP will do all this while considering the different national contexts – cultural, geographical, institutional an legal. • The proposed research will specifically deal with the challenges posed by the WFD

11. RBMP AND SCALE International negotiations RBMP as a sequence of interactions at different scales (stylised, assuming a large international basin) Scale National imple-mentation National pre-parations International Basin Local implementation National Local Time

12. MAIN GOALS 1 • Preparation of a “Handbook on PP methodologies“ for river basin management planning • Provide insight into social learning in a multi-phase multi-level context

13. MAIN GOALS 2 • Increase our understanding of the role of information and information tools • Compare and assess national PP experiences and their background • Involvement of national and subnational governments and major stakeholder groups

14. Framework of Analysis Participation as a social learning process Role of information and ICT tools National approaches & backgrounds Integration Case Studies and Experiments Co-ordination Handbook & Dissemination Workpackage Structure

15. WP 1 Objectives WP1 – Framing • To spell out our approach to PP and explore the main issues. • To develop a glossary in the filed of PP, social learning and RBMP for use within the project • To consult the public and stakeholders on our approach and our plans for research • To validate and further improve our plans for research

16. WP 2 Objectives WP2 - Participation as social learning • To conceptualise river basin management as sets of social processes at different levels, characterised by different forms of interest representation, conflictivity and institutionalisation • To specify the concept “social learning” for RBMP and make it measurable • To identify critical issues for participation as a means to promote social learning • To identify possible ways to handle these issues

17. WP 3 Objectives WP3 - The role of ICT tools • To provide a methodology to analyse the use of ICT tools and to assess their real impact on PP improvement

18. WP 4 Objectives WP4 - National approaches and backgrounds • To provide an overview of PP practices (aim, process, methods) in the different countries and, where possible, their effects • To explore the influence of institutional, legal, cultural, geographical/physical factors • To evaluate (national) learned lessons and develop practical criteria for evaluating participatory RBMP

19. WP 5 Objectives WP5 - Case studies and experiments • To gain first hand experience with PP in river basin management so as to examine how social processes and information tools and models are applied and used in practice at the river basin level • To study the issues identified in WP2-4 and test the ideas developed on effective PP so as to identify approaches that work and those that do not, highlighting those which can be put forward as ‘good European practices’

20. WP 6 Objectives WP6 – Integration • To integrate the results of WP1-WP5 and summarise state of the art on integrated RBMP. This will serve as a basis for the production of the handbook in WP7.

21. WP 7 Objectives WP7 - Handbook and dissemination • To promote effective dissemination of the (preliminary) results of the project • To produce a Handbook on PP methodologies to support the implementation of the PP provisions of the WFD at the EU, national and subnational level and promote social learning in RBMP • To develop an interactive communication and information platform on the internet and make the handbook a living document embedded into a community of practitioners.

22. Organizations involved • USF: University of Osnabrück, Institute for Environmental Systems Research, co-ordinator (with Aberdeen University as sub-contractors) • RBA: RBA Centre, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands • Ecologic, Germany • KULRD: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Organisational and Personnel Psychology (COPP), Belgium • RWS-RIZA, Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, The Netherlands • ENPC, LATTS-ENPC, France • Cemagref, France • Delft Hydraulics: WL|Delft Hydraulics, The Netherlands • Colenco: Colenco Power Engineering Ltd, Switzerland • ICIS/ UM, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands • UAH: University of Alcala de Henares, Environmental Economics Group, Department of Economic Analysis, Spain • Uniud: University of Udine, Italy • BUTE: Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary • WRc, United Kingdom (with Middlesex University, FHRC, as sub-contractors) • UAB: Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain