1 / 16

Free Will Theories: Exploring Agency and Determinism

This text explores various theories on free will, including agency theory, person theory, determinism, and objections to these theories. It also discusses compatibilism, indeterminism, libertarianism, and the concept of freedom as an assumption. Additionally, it touches on the debate about time as reality or illusion, Thomas Reid's defense of free will, and fatalism. Lastly, it examines contemporary explanations of behavior by Freud and Skinner and objections to their views on freedom.

Download Presentation

Free Will Theories: Exploring Agency and Determinism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Free Will Theories • Agency Theory: we define ourselves as agents through free choices: this we experience (and is what our theory should explain) • Person Theory: one’s will is free if he/ she has second-order desires to choose to act in certain ways; this distinguishes persons from non-free beings Harry Frankfurt (b. 1929) • Objection to both theories: how can “we” be both cause & effect?

  2. Determinism: All events (including human actions) have specific causes • Baron d’Holbach: the brain is material; its actions (e.g., thought, will) are dictated by physical laws, heredity, and environment (1723-89)

  3. (Hard) Determinism • Behavior is caused by unconscious desires and fears (Freud) or environment and heredity (Skinner). Freedom is an illusion; people are not responsible for their actions—though they can be held responsible for social purposes • Objections: how we can challenge or change our attitudes if we are determined? Why not explain behavior with reasons, not causes?

  4. Freedom - Determinism Theories • Compatibilism (Soft Determinism): freedom is compatible with determinism, if freedom is understood as the ability to do what we want • Actions caused by our choices or character are free; actions caused by external forces (genetics, culture, upbringing, threats) are not free Choice/will (cause) act (cause) Personality External forces Hard determinist reply: choices are caused by external forces.

  5. Hume Compatibilism/Soft Determinism:freedom is compatible with determinism • A “free” act is simply one that is caused (i.e., preceded) by our choice or act of will. We are free when we can do what we want. (free) choice/will/personality cause act external threats/constraints (not free) cause Objection: aren’t choices caused by “external” forces (e.g., genetics, culture, upbringing)?

  6. Freedom - Determinism Theories • Indeterminism: like sub-atomic events, free actions are unpredictable, because nothing causes them • Objection: if free human actions are chance or random events, then we could not control our “free” actions or be responsible for them • Libertarianism: our free choices define our selves: this is what we experience (and is what our theory should explain) • Objection: how can “we” be both cause & effect?

  7. Freedom - Determinism Theories • Freedom as an Assumption: Morality requires that we think of ourselves as free. As objects in the world, we are determined; but as conscious, choosing beings, we are free (Kant) • Existentialism: freedom & self-consciousness consist in our ability to conceive that which is not—and that could not be caused by what is • Objection: Wanting to believe in freedom does not make it true; besides, even that is determined

  8. Time: Reality or Illusion? • Time is the objective, fixed sequence of events in the world: “it” is real and does not change. The subjective experience of time as moving is illusory (McTaggart, Smart) • Time is a mental construct in terms of which all phenomena are experienced as real (Kant) • Objective time is a conceptual abstraction that fails to capture our real experience of duration and the passage from past to future (Bergson)

  9. In Defense of Free Will:Thomas Reid • We are conscious of exerting our wills, deliberating, and thinking of ourselves as free to have done otherwise • If we are not free, regret, guilt, and holding others responsible for actions make no sense (1710-96)

  10. Freedom - Determinism Theories • Indeterminism: like sub-atomic events, free actions are unpredictable, because nothing causes them • Objection: if free human actions are chance or random events, then we could not control our “free” actions or be responsible for them • Agency Theory: our free choices define our selves: this is what we experience (and is what our theory should explain) • Objection: how can “we” be both cause & effect?

  11. Fatalism: What happens could not have occurred otherwise Aristotle (384-322 BCE) • Propositions about future events (including human actions) are either true or false right now; so the future is unchangeable (Aristotle) • God knows what we will do in the future; so we cannot change the future (Augustine) St. Augustine (354-430)

  12. Determinism: All events (including human actions) have specific causes • Baron d’Holbach: the brain is material; so its actions (e.g., thought, will) are controlled by physical laws, heredity, and environment (1723-89) • Pierre-Simon Laplace: with a complete knowledge now of every particle in the universe, we could predict all future events (1749-1827)

  13. Contemporary Explanations of Behavior S. Freud (1856-1939) B.F. Skinner (1904-90) Our behavior is caused by: • unconscious desires or fears and repressed memories (Freud) • environment, social conditioning (Skinner) • heredity, genes Objections: these accounts seem to make freedom an illusion. But (1) how are we able to change? And (2) why not explain behavior with reasons, not causes?

  14. The Determinist Argument:All our actions are caused by forces over which we have no control. And if we have no control over our actions, we are not free. • Responses: • Libertarianism: some actions are free because they are not causally determined • Compatibilism: even if all actions are causally determined, we can still be free

  15. Libertarianism:Some human acts are undetermined • Argument from experience: we are conscious of deliberating and thinking of ourselves as free to have done otherwise • Objection: this could be self-deception • Indeterminism: like sub-atomic events, free actions are only probable, not determined • Objection: if free actions are random or only probable events, then we could not control or be responsible for them

  16. More Libertarian Arguments • The impossibility of self-prediction: any prediction of our own behavior would affect (and thus change) that behavior • Objection: predicting what we will do does not necessarily affect what we do • Moral accountability: if we are not free, then moral responsibility makes no sense • Objection: maybe regret, guilt, and moral responsibility are unjustified

More Related