1 / 14

Making our own canvas: how we did a comprehensive review of our information literacy program

Making our own canvas: how we did a comprehensive review of our information literacy program. Anne Behler Information Literacy Librarian behler@psu.edu @annielivre John J Meier, Science Librarian meier@psu.edu @johnmeier1. Library Leaders Program. 2012/2013 Anne, Ellysa, John 2

timon-rodriquez
Download Presentation

Making our own canvas: how we did a comprehensive review of our information literacy program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Making our own canvas: how we did a comprehensive review of our information literacy program

  2. Anne Behler • Information Literacy Librarian • behler@psu.edu • @annielivre • John J Meier, Science Librarian • meier@psu.edu @johnmeier1

  3. Library Leaders Program • 2012/2013 • Anne, Ellysa, John2 • First Time / Experiment • Developed as we went

  4. Anne is here John is here

  5. Consultative Study • Original proposal • Examine Tactical Plans • Develop recommendations • Draft implementation plan

  6. Counter-proposal • Negotiating scope • Our authority - acting as them • Added other stakeholders

  7. Consultative Study (revised) • Our response • Benchmark peer libraries • Examine online tools • Recommend an assessment model • Initiatives for professional development

  8. Development of the Report • Timeline = aggressive • Divide and Conquer • Skype and some F2F • Google Docs FTW

  9. Methodology and Findings • Benchmark against 46 ARL libraries • Review technology • Compare to ACRL Characteristics • Examine peer professional development support flickr image by Kiran Foster

  10. Recommendations • Identify institutional stakeholders outside of the Libraries and partner with them • Establish a Community of Practice • Select a leader to assume responsibility for information literacy for the entire University Libraries • Assessment practices should be shared

  11. Lessons Learned • Developed in a vacuum • Implementation of other recommendations difficult - requires job changes or extensive buy-in or authority flickr: Amarand Agasi

  12. Silver Linings • Community of Practice • Changes for next cohort Flickr: Mike King

  13. Recommended Reading List • Reframing Academic Leadership book (Bohlman) • ACRL Characteristics of Programs of Information Literacy that Illustrate Best Practices • Moving Forward Report https://scholarsphere.psu.edu/files/sf268b978 • Michigan’s Instructor College Cafehttp://open.umich.edu/node/5748 • Penn State University Libraries Community of Practice http://sites.psu.edu/psulcop

More Related