National Call on Public Reporting of Local Child Outcomes Data

1. National Call on Public Reportingof Local Child Outcomes Data NECTAC/ECO June 11, 2010

2. Objectives for the call • Information sharing about the requirement to report local child outcomes data • Discussion of questions and issues

3. Public Reporting Requirement in IDEA 2004 (Report C3 and B7 the same way and at the same time you do the local reporting on other indicators) `(C) PUBLIC REPORTING AND PRIVACY- `(i) IN GENERAL- The State shall use the targets established in the plan and priority areas described in subsection (a)(3) to analyze the performance of each local educational agency in the State in implementing this part. `(ii) REPORT- `(I) PUBLIC REPORT- The State shall report annually to the public on the performance of each local educational agency located in the State on the targets in the State's performance plan. The State shall make the State's performance plan available through public means, including by posting on the website of the State educational agency, distribution to the media, and distribution through public agencies. `(II) STATE PERFORMANCE REPORT- The State shall report annually to the Secretary on the performance of the State under the State's performance plan.

4. Local Reporting on C3 and B7- Is anything different? • The state C3 and B7 SPP data included: • Percentages of children in the progress categories (a through e) for each of the 3 outcomes • The 2 Summary Statement percentages for each outcome • Baseline and target data on the 2 Summary Statements for each outcome

5. The Summary Statements • Of those children who entered or exited the program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they exited the program. • The percent of children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they exited the program.

6. What to include in local reporting • For each local program: • The percentages of children reported for each Summary Statement for each outcome , i.e. The percent who changed growth trajectories and the percent who reached age expectations for each outcome Compared to • The state targets for FFY2009

7. Methods for reporting - Tabular data Outcome 3: Taking Appropriate Action to Meet Needs

8. Questions and issues:Reflecting local program How can the data reflect our local program effectiveness when not all the children who exit from our program received all of their services here?

9. Questions and issues: Comparisons How large does a difference have to be to be a meaningful difference? • Local to state target, local to local • Big local programs are likely to track the state Summary Statements closely • Cautions related to comparisons • Quality of the data • Number of children in the calculations (i.e., small n) • What factors explain a difference?

10. Questions and issues: Messaging Putting the message on the data – why do we do it? how do we do it?: • Understanding the potential for misinterpretation of data • Needing to have different messages for different audiences (levels for detail) • Making sure that persons explaining the data have good understanding of the data • Other issues you have?

11. Questions and Issues: Getting local programs ready What are programs doing to get ready for public reporting of local data? • Make sure local programs understand and can explain the summary statements • Make sure local programs understand and can explain the a-e progress categories • Note: will need a-e to understand summary statements

13. The Summary Statements • Of those children who entered the program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program. • The percent of children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program.

14. Other Ways to Think about Summary Statement 1 • How many children changed growth trajectories during their time in the program? • Percent of the children who entered the program below age expectations made greater than expected gains, made substantial increases in their rates of growth, i.e. changed their growth trajectories

15. Formula for SS 1 (c+d)/(a+b+c+d) 15

16. Summary Statement 2 2. The percent of children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program.

17. Other Ways to Think about Summary Statement 2 • How many children were functioning like same aged peers when they left the program? • Percent of the children who were functioning at age expectations in this outcome area when they exited the program, including those who: • started out behind and caught up and • entered and exited at age level

18. Formula for SS 2 (d+e)/(a+b+c+d+e)

19. Questions and Issues:Local data use How are programs thinking about using the local child outcomes data? • Local determinations? (optional) • Program improvement? (make sure you trust the data!) • Focusing TA to local programs? • For data quality • For program improvement

20. Questions and Issues Others?

21. Resources • There are several helpful documents on the NECTAC website • http://www.nectac.org/topics/quality/gensup.asp#reportdata • Forthcoming report from Technical Assistance Center on IDEA Accountability Data (DAC) with recommendations for small n’s • Outcomes meeting – July 30-31 2010!