Regions in transition changing economic and social drivers
Download
1 / 36

Regions in transition: Changing economic and social drivers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 72 Views
  • Uploaded on

Regions in transition: Changing economic and social drivers. John Rolfe CQUniversity. Acknowledgements. Research largely funded through the Minerals Future Cluster – a CSIRO Flagship program Several researchers involved in projects, particularly: Professor Stewart Lockie (ANU)

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Regions in transition: Changing economic and social drivers' - thuong


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements

  • Research largely funded through the Minerals Future Cluster – a CSIRO Flagship program

  • Several researchers involved in projects, particularly:

    • Professor Stewart Lockie (ANU)

    • Dr Jill Windle (CQU)

    • Dr Galina Ivanova (CQU)

    • Mr Lindsay Greer (CQU)Dr Delwar Akbar (CQU)


Why the economic and social impacts of this resource boom are different
Why the economic and social impacts of this resource boom are different

Issues for discussion

  • Macro economic effects

  • Competition between land resources

  • Regional economic effects uneven

  • Social Impacts

    • Workforce location and commuting

    • Housing

    • Community attitudes


A macro economic effects
A: MACRO ECONOMIC EFFECTS are different

  • Resources boom has significant macro economic effects

    • Higher exchange rate

    • Interest rates higher to curb inflation

  • Significant impacts on other economic sectors, particularly

    • Sectors that export (tourism, agriculture, manufacturing)

    • Sectors that are subject to competition from imports (tourism, manufacturing)


Classic case of dutch disease
Classic case of Dutch Disease are different

  • Dutch Disease occurs when rapid growth in one industry sector causes offsetting losses in other economic sectors

  • Typically caused by both

    • Macro effects (higher exchange rates and interest rates)

    • Micro effects (higher prices for skilled labour and other inputs)

  • Need to distinguish between longer term structural adjustment and short term growth pains


B competition between land uses
B. COMPETITION BETWEEN LAND USES are different

  • Increasing concern over allocation of land

    • Good agricultural land – Darling Downs in Qld

    • Rural lifestyle land – Qld and NSW

    • Cultural heritage – WA

    • Environment

  • Many resources are traded through market systems

    • Price mechanism used to identify who can generate highest net benefits

  • Cost benefit analysis can be used to capture both private and public benefits and costs


  • Land use in Qld in 2010 are different

  • Land use by resources industry is 0.09%

  • How should land be allocated in the future?


Coal mine case study in qld
Coal mine case study in Qld are different

  • Medium sized mine in Bowen Basin

    • 4 Mtpa of coking coal

    • 16 years of mine life

    • Footprint to cover 2,030 ha of grazing country

  • Major tradeoff in resource use is between using land for cattle production or for coal mining


Annual revenue and costs
Annual revenue and costs are different

Coal generates nearly 200 times the economic return from the land


How does the same analysis apply to coal seam gas in surat basin
How does the same analysis apply to Coal Seam Gas in Surat Basin?

  • Well footprint of about 60m x 60m (.4ha) when drilling, and 15mx15m (.02ha) post drilling

  • assume 1ha/well with pipelines and roads

  • At 750m grid spacing, loss of productive land is 1.7%

  • Ag. Land prices range from $950/ha to $6000/ha


Australia pacific lng example
Australia Pacific LNG example Basin?

  • Plans to develop up to 10,000 wells in Surat basin over 30 year period

    • Up 10,000 hectares out of agricultural production (for 20 years)

      • At average land price of $3500/ha = $35M in perpetual lost Ag. profits

  • Annual increase in Gross State Product of > $900M in Surat Basin for 30 years

  • Assuming 20% of GSP is profit and royalties, PV at 10% discount rate is $1.7B.

  • CSG generates > 20 – 40 times economic return of agriculture

  • About 100 – 200 times return on grazing


Why the level of protest
Why the level of protest? Basin?

  • Given the economics of allocating land to CSG in the Surat, why the level of protest?

  • Three key groups of reasons

  • Distribution effects

  • Social impacts

  • Environmental risks


C uneven economic distribution
C: UNEVEN ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Basin?

  • Concern is that regional areas will not share in the wealth

  • But resource developments + employment + business spending is widespread

  • CQU team did assessment of resource expenditure in every LGA in Qld in 2010.

  • Results show that there are already large impacts of resource industries across Qld





The importance of the resources sector in the surat
The importance of the resources sector in the Surat expenditure areas labelled

  • Employment in 2009/2010

    • 6.1% of DD region

    • 11.5% of Maranoa

    • 4.2% of Toowoomba

    • 21.6% of Western Downs

  • Job Multipliers

    • Maranoa – 2.3

    • Toowoomba – 6.7

    • Western Downs – 4.3


Distribution of economic impacts
Distribution of economic impacts expenditure areas labelled

  • Increasing share of population growth and economic benefits going to major centres and coastal zones

    • Home location of workforce and contractors

    • Spending flows in business supply chain

    • In Qld, > 50% goes to Brisbane

    • Increasing economic leakages as wealth increases and population becomes more mobile

  • While regional areas benefit from major projects, only a share is retained

    • Level of expenditure capture appears to be falling in mining and smaller communities

    • Will decline sharply with FIFO and automation


Predicting population changes conservative
Predicting population changes – conservative expenditure areas labelled

  • Assumptions about workforce moving to local areas:

    • Central Highlands: 25%

    • Barcaldine: 5%

    • Isaac: 15%

    • Gladstone: 66%

  • Assumptions about location of FIFO workers

    • Rockhampton: 10%

    • Mackay: 15%

    • Bundaberg: 5%

    • Outside CQ: 70%


D social impacts
D: SOCIAL IMPACTS expenditure areas labelled

  • CQU team have been using several novel methods to assess some of the tradeoffs around local development and impacts

  • Asking people if they would prefer to give up the income and employment to avoid project impacts

  • Asking people how long they plan to live in a community – and how their plans would change if some positive or negative impacts occurred



The life cycle hypothesis
The life cycle hypothesis expenditure areas labelled

  • Living locally and commuting are options for people at different stages in life cycle

  • Young and single – commute

  • Young families – live local

  • Teenage families – begin to commute

  • Empty nesters – commute


What mining employees want 1
What mining employees want - 1 expenditure areas labelled


What mining employees want 2
What mining employees want - 2 expenditure areas labelled


What mining employees want 3
What mining employees want - 3 expenditure areas labelled


The housing debate
The Housing debate expenditure areas labelled

  • High housing costs are transmission link between economic pressures and social impacts

  • Very difficult to avoid housing shortages with developments

    • Private investors risk adverse

    • Time lags with development

    • Costs and logistics of development

    • Delays in planning and approval processes



Responses to town development
Responses to town development expenditure areas labelled

  • Residents in Moranbah will leave up to 2 years earlier if major workcamps in town

  • Up to 0.5 year earlier if dust and noise impacts


A choice experiment on tradeoffs in the surat
A choice experiment on tradeoffs in the Surat expenditure areas labelled

  • Surveyed a random sample of Brisbane residents to assess views on:

    • Number of jobs created locally (in the Surat Basin) in the mining industry

    • Higher housing prices (housing shortages)

    • Rising wage costs (labour shortages) in the non mining sector

    • More independent monitoring activity and inspections

    • How much people pay each year for 5 years (reduced income if mining is slowed)


How people viewed the importance of issues
How people viewed the importance of issues expenditure areas labelled


Example choice set
Example choice set expenditure areas labelled


Responses can be summarised into 5 groups
Responses can be summarised into 5 groups expenditure areas labelled


Summary of groups
Summary of groups expenditure areas labelled

  • Class 1 (24.5%): Environmental concerns but very cost sensitive - only focused on environmental impacts

  • Class 2 (16%): Jobs tradeoff - all non-job impacts important, prefer to reduce the negative impacts at the cost of more jobs

  • Class 3 (20%): Housing concerns are most important, will trade off jobs for other improvements

  • Class 4 (17%): Environmental focus and not cost conscious, will tradeoff against jobs growth

  • Class 5 (22.5%): Business wages tradeoff, a balanced tradeoff / compromise between positive and negative impacts apart from business wages which are traded-off in favour of other




Recommendations
Recommendations expenditure areas labelled

  • Search to maximise the investment and employment benefits & minimise impacts

  • Make residential location an open choice

    • Allow workers to choose between local, DIDO and FIFO options

  • Keep block shifts as short as possible (< 7 days)

  • Provide as much housing as possible at project start

  • Make local towns attractive for workforce to live locally

    • Pay attention to infrastructure, housing, services, lifestyle

  • Foster growth of supply chain in the region


ad