1 / 23

DNA barcoding in Microorganisms

DNA barcoding in Microorganisms. Alexandre Soares Rosado Institute of Microbiology UFRJ - Brazil. Bergey’s Manual = 4500 Species Some studies DNA reassociation= 10.000 genomes / g soil; 1% - 5% of microorganismos are culturable The majority = uncuturable .

thu
Download Presentation

DNA barcoding in Microorganisms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DNA barcoding in Microorganisms Alexandre Soares Rosado Institute of Microbiology UFRJ - Brazil

  2. Bergey’s Manual = 4500 Species Some studies DNA reassociation= 10.000 genomes / g soil; 1% - 5% of microorganismos are culturable The majority = uncuturable

  3. BRAZILIAN BIODIVERSITYFonte: Lewinsohn & Prado, 2000

  4. DNA barcoding • DNA barcoding is a methodology for identifying species using a short DNA sequence. It is purported to be a reliable, inexpensive and easily accessible tool for both taxonomic specialists and non-specialists (e.g., government officials, professionals in health and agriculture). • To date, rRNA genes are the most frequently used target for identifying microorganisms, because not only do they occur in all living organisms, but they typically are also present in several copies that are distributed over the genome.

  5. Background information • Based on the information, many molecular tools (e.g. FISH, T-RFLP, PCR, RAPD, Sequencing etc.) have been developed to discriminate many microorganisms. Of the methods, DNA sequencing generally provides the most accurate means for identifying them. • For species identities, investigators generally compare their own DNA sequence to GenBank database by BLAST search. In each case, result quality depends mainly on the reference databank being used. However, each of these databases contains many errors, putting limits on their value for diagnosing differently originated organisms. • Further, in cases that DNA sequence matched is not found and hit score queried is low, it is difficult to identify them based on BLAST search.

  6. Application of molecular fingerprinting techniques to study the composition and dynamics of soil microbial communities Advantages Cultivation-independent analysis of large numbers of samples Top-to-bottom analysis: Sequencing of differentiating bands Taxon-specific primers Use of probes to identify bacterial isolates corresponding to differentiating bands

  7. Study of Microbial Communities

  8. Ubiquitous distribution Functionally conserved in all forms of life The rRNA-gene - an ideal molecular marker? „The molecular clock“ Regions of different degrees of conservation Disadvantages Different number of ribosomal operons Sequence heterogeneities A given variable region allows a different resolution for different taxa

  9. Figure 1: gene rpoB

  10. Figure 2: Distance (p) among strains of Paenibacillus 16S and rpoB

  11. „community“ DNA or RNA PCR amplification of 16S or 18S rDNA fragments Few prominent populations (low evenness): patterns with few bands Molecular fingerprints of microbial communities Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE, TGGE) Many equally abundant populations (high evenness): patterns with many bands

  12. Soil aggregation and bacterial community structure asaffected by tillage and cover cropping in theBrazilian CerradosPeixoto et al., 2006 The Cerrados region in central Brazil occupies 22% of the country. It is characterized by high average temperature (22 - 270C), rainfall (800 - 1600 mm) and solar radiation (475- 500 Cal/cm2/day).

  13. No Till X Till

  14. L TW1 TW2 T1 T2 NTW1 NTW2 NT1 NT2 F1 F2 L L TW1 TW2 T1 T2 NTW1 F2 NT1 NT2 F1 NTW2 L A B 16S

  15. L TW1 TW2 T1 T2 NTW1 NTW2 NT1 NT2 F1 F2 L rpoB

  16. Biodiversity DGGE- Fingerprints 16S rDNA Diversity of bacterial comunities Identification/ 16S rDNA-Sequencing 1b Bacillus megaterium 2b Arthrobacter sp. 1s Sphinghomonas 2s Streptomyces galbus 3s Streptomyces sp. 4s Nocardia 5s Pseudomonas sp. 6s Pseudomonas 1p Bacillus megaterium 2p unknown Bacterium 3p unknown Bacterium 1r Pseudomonas sp.

  17. IV c 7 a IV 6 IIIb Cluster I Cluster II Cluster III 4 V 5 IIIb IIIb IV Cluster Cluster IV Cluster V IIIb 3 III I 1 V V VI Cluster Cluster IV V Cluster 2 Comparison between Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) and Phylogenetic Analysis for characterization of A/H3N2 Influenza Samples detected during 1999-2004 epidemics in Brazil. b

  18. Mangroves • Our knowledge of mangrove associated bacteria has been limited by a pronounced sampling, culturing and experimental bias. • Prokaryotic organisms recognized so far are only few bacterial phyla • Further, most isolates/ or strains studied hitherto have yet been correctly identified to species-level. • Thus, the aim of this project is to determine accurate, precise 16S DNA sequences of more than 1,300 bp from sediments and rizosphere of mangrove plants tighter with traditional methods, and then to evaluate them to advance phylogentic relationships and DNA barcoding.

  19. Important issues • Biodiversity and Systematics • Our knowledge of biodiversity needs to be greatly expanded by doubling the rate of taxonomic inventories and species discovery and description by 2015. • This will require a commensurate increase in taxonomic expertise and infrastructure. • The rapidly developing field of informatics and communications technology must be harnessed both to facilitate scientific work and to disseminate taxonomicproducts to all users, including the general public. • There are several issues and problems, however, that need to be addressed before barcoding can be instituted, especially for single-celled microorganisms . Linking barcodes to accurately identified species represents a large hurdle that must be overcome.

  20. When the most efficient means of rapid barcode-based species identification is sought, a choice can be made either for one of these methodologies or for basic high-throughput sequencing, depending on the strategic outlook of the investigator and on current costs. Arrays and functionally similar platforms may have a particular advantage when a biologically complex material such as soil or a human respiratory secretion sample is analysed to give a census of relevant species present.

  21. Acknowledgments: Laboratory of Molecular Microbial Ecology –LMME Petrobras CNPq

More Related