1 / 14

Bow Echo Sensitivity to Ambient Moisture and Cold Pool Strength

Bow Echo Sensitivity to Ambient Moisture and Cold Pool Strength. Richard P. James, Paul M. Markowski, and J. Michael Fritsch, 2006: Mon. Wea. Rev. , 134, 950 – 964. Image source: http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/research/roth/072120031203zrad.gif. Introduction.

thora
Download Presentation

Bow Echo Sensitivity to Ambient Moisture and Cold Pool Strength

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Bow Echo Sensitivity to Ambient Moisture and Cold Pool Strength Richard P. James, Paul M. Markowski, and J. Michael Fritsch, 2006: Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 950–964. Image source: http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/research/roth/072120031203zrad.gif

  2. Introduction • Bow echoes are a common form of convective organization often associated with severe wind damage (Klimowski et al. 2003). • Previous studies (Johns and Hirt 1987) examined warm-season derecho environments. • Numerical modeling results have previously focused on sensitivity of bow echoes to CAPE and low-level shear. • This paper attempts to address the role of ambient moisture even when CAPE is held constant.

  3. Methodology • Numerical model (James et al. 2005) • 360 x 120 km domain • 500 m horizontal resolution • 200 m vertical resolution below 5 km, increasing to 500 m above 8.5 km • The model was initialized with warm bubbles spaced 20 km apart. • Ice physics were included in all simulations.

  4. Methodology (cont.) • Three different mixing ratio lapse rates were used (1 g kg−1 km−1, 3 g kg−1 km−1, and 4 g kg−1 km−1) • CAPE was held constant (4600 J kg−1) with a fixed temperature, pressure, and relative humidity at the top of the mixed layer. • Simulations used 0–2.5-km shear magnitudes of 16, 20, and 24 m s−1. • All simulations had an integration length of 6 h.

  5. Results

  6. 4 g kg−1 km−1

  7. 3 g kg−1 km−1

  8. 1 g kg−1 km−1

  9. Cold Pool Strength (C) and C/ΔU Ratio t = 4 h t = 6 h CAPE = 4600 J kg−1 0–2.5-km shear = 24 m s−1 Low level mixing ratio lapse rate = 4 g kg−1 km−1 (Most Moist)

  10. Cold Pool Strength (C) and C/ΔU Ratio t = 4 h t = 6 h CAPE = 4600 J kg−1 0–2.5-km shear = 24 m s−1 Low level mixing ratio lapse rate = 3 g kg−1 km−1

  11. Cold Pool Strength (C) and C/ΔU Ratio t = 4 h t = 6 h CAPE = 4600 J kg−1 0–2.5-km shear = 24 m s−1 Low level mixing ratio lapse rate = 1 g kg−1 km−1 (Least Moist)

  12. Conclusions • Stronger cold pools are associated with larger scale three-dimensional features. • An intermediate amount of ambient moisture results in the most robust bow echo formation. • The cold pool strength balances the shear only locally allowing bowing segments to develop. • Large CAPE and strong low-level shear constitute may represent necessary, but not sufficient, conditions for bow echo formation.

More Related