1 / 12

Energy Cost Savings Using Insulative Plastic Film

Energy Cost Savings Using Insulative Plastic Film. ME 340 Project – Nolan Crook. How can I reduce my home energy costs?. Plastic film is a very cheap and simple option for adding window insulation, but how well does it work?.

Download Presentation

Energy Cost Savings Using Insulative Plastic Film

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Energy Cost Savings Using Insulative Plastic Film ME 340 Project – Nolan Crook

  2. How can I reduce my home energy costs? • Plastic film is a very cheap and simple option for adding window insulation, but how well does it work? Objective: Determine cost savings per year when using plastic film insulation

  3. Problem Setup and Procedure Tsurface_inside_window Tsurface_plastic_film Tsurface_outside 2-pane window Tinf_outside Tinf_inside Plastic film • Determine the temperatures of: • Tinf_outside • Tinf_inside • Tsurface_outside • Tsurface_inside_window • Tsurface_plastic_film • Use this info to find heat transfer coefficient “h” using free convection with vertical plate • Describe the window with and without film as a single resistor • Use this resistance value to find insulation efficiency throughout the year

  4. Case 1 – No film (double paned window) Routside Rwindow Rinside Tinf_outside Tsurface_inside_window Tinf_inside Tsurface_outside Resistor Network:

  5. Case 2 – Plastic film included Routside Rwindow Rfilm+enclosed_air Rinside Tsurface_outside Tplastic Tinf_outside Tinf_inside Tsurface_inside_window Resistor Network:

  6. Actual Measured Air Temperatures (from my room window)

  7. Convection for vertical Plate Find Grashof Number Find Rayleigh Number using Grashof Find Nusselt Number using Rayleigh (Nusselt for vertical plate free convection) Find convection coefficient for both cases from Nuzzelt Number Find q (W/m^2) for both cases using convection coefficient Find Rfilm and Rno_film using q and Tinf_out as well as Tinf_in (See attached calculation sheet for more details)

  8. Energy analysis • Define q as a function of Tinf_out so that the outside temperature can be varied over the course of the year while holding a constant Tinf_in • The area of the windows was calculated using parameters for my apartment (6 windows, 12.26m^2 total)

  9. Energy Analysis Continued Taken from weather.com for Provo, UT • Define Energy (kW*hr) as a function of q(Tinf_out) • In the above equations, 12 hours was used instead of 24 to evaluate at both average high and low temperatures for Provo. • Also, the absolute values of the above equations were taken to account for heating or cooling (energy leaving or entering through window)

  10. Results over course of year

  11. Results/Discussion • As can be seen from previous slide, energy transfer through the window is muchless using plastic film, especially during the winter • Total energy transfer values over year: • No film: 18,804 kW*hr • Plastic film: 3,012 kW*hr (six times less!) • Total energy costs (assuming 1 kW*hr electricity = $0.08, and all heating cooling done with electricity at 100% efficiency) • No film: $1504 • Plastic film: $241 • Savings: $1263 • Cost of plastic film: $12.95

  12. Conclusions • There is a large energy cost savings for using an extra insulative layer on inside of windows, at only a cost of $12.95 from amazon.com • This is accomplished by reducing the temperature difference between most inner surface temperature and Tinf_inner ,thereby reducing free convection • The savings of $1200/year seems very large; this may be due to the following inaccuracies: • The thermal resistance of the window is held constant across changing temperatures, but in reality the convection coefficient of the free convection will change at different temperatures • Average low and high temperatures are assumed to be at 12 hour durations each, which is not accurate at Provo’s latitude • All heating and cooling is assumed to be electric (no natural gas), with 100% efficiencies

More Related