- 370 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

MITRAL STENOSIS

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

MITRAL STENOSIS

Nick Tehrani, MD

- Hx of Rheumatic fever is elicited in only 50% of path proven cases
- Other causes
- Severe MAC
- Congenital MS

- Diagnosis of acute rheumatic fever
- Two major Jones criteria, OR
- One major criterion, and two minor criteria
MajorMinor

CarditisFever

Erythema marginatumPR prolongation

ChoreaESR elevation

Subcutaneous nodulesHx of Rheumatic fever

- Additionally, serologic evidence of recent streptococcal infection is needed:
- Positive bacteriologic culture
- Increase in ASO titers
- Increase in anti-DNAse B titers

- The acute valvular pathology caused by Rheumatic fever is:
Mitral Regurgitation

- Over the next several decades stenosis accrues by:
- Thickening of the leaflets
- Fusion of the commisures
- Fusion or shortening of the chordae

- Valve Area:
- <1.0 cm2 Severe
- 1.0-1.5 cm2 Moderate
- >1.5-2.5 cm2 Mild

- Mean gradient:
- >10 mmHg Severe
- 5-10 mmHg Moderate
- <5 mmHg Mild

- Persistent LA-LV gradient in diastole sustained flow throughout diastole
- The slope of the envelope is proportional to the severity of stenosis

- Note the “A” in patient who is in sinus

- Limited flow into the LV has 3 major sequale:
- Elevation of Lt. Atrial pressure
- Secondary RV pressure overload
- Reduced LV ejection performance
- Due to diminished preload
- Tachycardic response to compensate to decreased SV worsens the transmitral gradient

- Determinants of Transmitral Pressure Gradient

Increased Flow, OR

Decreased orifice size

Incr. Gradient.

Elevated LA pressure

HR=72

HR=100

Problems are

Introduced by:

- The three inter-related parameters are:
- HR
- CO
- Trans-mitral gradient
Mitral valve area

Heart rate variability

CO measurement and reproducibility

- Echocardiographic:
- PISA
- 2-D
- Pressure half-time

- Cath:
- Gorlin’s Equation
- Pressure half time

- Torricelli’s Law:

- Cc =Coefficient of
- Orifice contraction

- The Second Equation:

- Cv=Coefficient of
- Velocity

- Substituting for V, in Torricelli’s Eq.

C

44.3

Simplification of the above:

?

- Flow Across any Valve:
- For Mitral (and Tricuspid) valve:

- Substituting for “Flow” and “h” in the first Eq.:

- The Gorlin Formula for Mitral Valve area:

- COCardiac output
- DFPDiastolic Filling Period
- HRHeart Rate
- 44.3Derived Constant
- CCorrection factor for valve type
C=1.0 for all valves except Mitral

C=0.85 for Mitral valve

- PMean pressure gradient

Step 1: Figure out the Numerator First:

Dimensional analysis:

DFP in Sec/beat

Measure the Distance in mm from MV opening to MV closing in one beat

Convert distance to time

100 speed= 100 mm/sec, makes life easy

50 speed= 50 mm/sec, tough life

Assuming Patient is in Sinus

Measure the RR interval in mm

Convert to Beats/min by…

In 100 speed just divide 6,000 by the RR in mm

No Mitral Stenosis

Left Atrial

Tracing

C

A

V

Planimeter

DFP

Shifted Over

- The trickiest part is to set up the instrument correctly:

- The reading must be adjusted to
- 0.0000

- Area as provided by the instrument is in (in)x(in)
- Must convert to (cm)x(cm)
- Multiply by 6.45 cm2/In2

- To obtain mean Area under the curve
- Divide the Area by the DFP in cm

- To convert cm of pressure to mm of Hg
- Multiply the above # in cm, by the “scale factor”
- Get “Scale factor” from the tracing: mm Hg/cm

- If patient is in sinus =>5 tracings
- If patient is in A-Fib.=>10 tracings

CC/Sec

cm2

CC/sec.cm2.(mm Hg)P0.5

mm Hg

- Wedge vs. LA Pressure
- Stiff End-hole catheter:Cournand
- Verify true wedge by checking O2 Sat
- Mean Wedge should be less than Mean PA

- Cardiac Output
- True Fick vs. Thermodilution vs. Green dye

- Concurrent MR with MS:
- Gradient across the valve reflects forward and regurgitant flow
- CO reflects the net forward flow only
- Likely underestimation of the true valve area

- Even in sinus rhythm, the low velocity flow predisposes to formation of atrial thrombi.
- Low flow pattern is seen as spontaneous contrast on echocardiography
- 17% of patients undergoing surgery for MS have LA thrombus
- In one third of cases thrombus restricted to the LAA

- Normal pressure drop across pulmonary bed:
10-15 mm Hg

- Expected mean PA in Mitral Stenosis:
Mean LA (elevated of course) + (10-15 mm Hg)

- In MS, Mean PA pressure often exceed the expected.

- This pulmonary hypertension has two components:
- Reactive pulmonary arterial vasoconstriction,
- Potentially Fixed resistance, secondary to morphologic changes in the pulmonary vasculature

Step 1: Figure out the Numerator First:

Dimensional analysis:

DFP in Sec/beat

Measure the Distance in mm from MV opening to MV closing in one beat

Convert distance to time

100 speed= 100 mm/sec, makes life easy

50 speed= 50 mm/sec, tough life

Assuming Patient is in Sinus

Measure the RR interval in mm

Convert to Beats/min by…

In 100 speed just divide 60,000 by the RR in mm

C

A

V

Planimeter

DFP

- Area as provided by the instrument is in (in)x(in)
- Must convert to (cm)x(cm)
- Multiply by 6.45 cm2/In2

- To obtain mean Area under the curve
- Divide the Area by the DFP in cm

- To convert cm of pressure to mm of Hg
- Multiply the above # in cm, by the “scale factor”
- Get “Scale factor” from the tracing: mm Hg/cm