fea of towers for dome c
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
FEA of Towers for Dome C

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 14

FEA of Towers for Dome C - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 82 Views
  • Uploaded on

FEA of Towers for Dome C. JL Dournaux / JPh Amans GEPI, Pôle Instrumental - Paris Observatory [email protected] FEA of Towers for Dome C. Means to increase tower’s stability Mechanical behaviour of steels at low temperatures Description of the models used for simulation

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'FEA of Towers for Dome C' - thane


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
fea of towers for dome c

FEA of Towers for Dome C

JL Dournaux / JPh Amans

GEPI, Pôle Instrumental - Paris Observatory

[email protected]

fea of towers for dome c2

FEA of Towers for Dome C

Means to increase tower’s stability

Mechanical behaviour of steels at low temperatures

Description of the models used for simulation

Results on nominal solutions

Purposed solutions to improve stability of truss tower

how to increase tower s stability hammerschlag et al 2006
How to increase tower’s stability(Hammerschlag et al., 2006)
  • Active methods consume power and can generate heat
  • Some passive methods are:
    • Eigenfrequencies of towers > 10 Hz
      • Energy in the wind variations decreases quickly between 1 and 10 Hz
    • Only plane motions of the platform parallel to the ground (i.e. no rotations x or y)
      • Astronomical objects are far away
  • But
    • Changes in tower’s design have to keep the centre of the tower free to lift the telescope
aim of the study
Aim of the study
  • Preliminary FEA of 2 concept towers designed by JP Amans (GEPI, Paris Observatory)
  • Check the stability of these concept towers
  • Improve performances of these 2 concept towers

Truss Tower “Amans” Tabouret Tower (ATT)

mechanical behaviour of steels at low temperatures
Mechanical Behaviour of Steels at low temperatures
  • E increases slowly when T decreases
  • Small differences in E values between summer (-30°C) and winter (-80°C)
    • For a C steel: 207 / 210 GPa
    • For a stainless steel: 168 / 174 GPa
  • Ductility decreases strongly when T decreases

5 Stainless Steel / 6 C Steel

(Thermeau, 2004)

models description
Models Description
  • Containers and platform are not modelled
  • Boundary Conditions:
    • Tower’s feet are fixed
    • Mass applied on the top of the tower: 100 t
  • No rotation between tubes (joints)
  • No thermal gradients
dynamic behaviour of truss tower
Dynamic behaviour of truss tower
  • Tube 300x5, C steel
  • Small differences of dynamic behaviour in summer and in winter: frequencies variations < 0,1 Hz
dynamic behaviour of truss tower8
Dynamic behaviour of truss tower
  • Tube 300x5, stainless steel
  • Small differences of dynamic behaviour in summer and in winter: frequencies variations < 0,1 Hz
dynamic behaviour of truss tower9
Dynamic behaviour of truss tower
  • The following results are for a Carbon steel @ -80°C
  • The 1st modes @ 5,2 Hz harm because they create a strong rotation of platform
  • Change tower’s design to increase these frequencies and reduce the rotation they produce
dynamic behaviour of truss tower10
Dynamic behaviour of truss tower
  • Different kind of add-ons are tested
  • The most efficient is obtained by reinforcing the corners of the tower in all directions
  • Reinforce only the 2 first floors allows to increase the frequency @ 5.3 Hz. The rate of rotation is almost not affected
dynamic behaviour of truss tower11
Dynamic behaviour of truss tower
  • Increase tube diameter of the 2 firsts floors allows to improve tower’s performances
dynamic behaviour of amans tabouret stool tower
Dynamic behaviour of Amans Tabouret(Stool) Tower
  • Tubes 1016x4 & 291x3
  • Modes 1/2 & 4/5 harm
  • Eigenfrequencies are lower than for truss tower but the platform is more stable
dynamic behaviour of att
Dynamic behaviour of ATT
  • Tower’s performances seem to be less sensitive to tube diameter than Truss Tower
conclusions
Conclusions
  • Results:
    • Add appropriate add-ons and increase diameters of vertical tubes of first floors may allow to obtain 1st modes of truss tower beyond 10 Hz
    • Platform’s rotations are weaker for ATT but eigenfrequencies too
  • Next steps:
    • Test other concept tower(s)
    • Master student (Calculate transfer function to precisely determine wind effects by FEM, implement methods for vibration control, define a prototype…) in collaboration with Pr André Preumont (ULB/INSA Lyon)
ad