1 / 16

C2 Self-Synchronisation and Swarming

C2 Self-Synchronisation and Swarming. J Miles June 2008. Contents. Discussion regarding alternative forms of synchronisation Characteristics of swarming Historical examples of swarming behaviour

Download Presentation

C2 Self-Synchronisation and Swarming

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. C2 Self-Synchronisation and Swarming J Miles June 2008

  2. Contents • Discussion regarding alternative forms of synchronisation • Characteristics of swarming • Historical examples of swarming behaviour • The appropriateness of self-synchronisation and swarming behaviour in the context of the maritime environment

  3. Alternative forms of synchronisation • Hierarchical • Mutual • Self or or or

  4. Key Key Info Pull Info Pull Feedback Feedback b b Synchronising Synchronising activity activity Higher c c c Authority Entity status Entity status Entity status Entity status supervision supervision Higher a a Authority Entity status Entity status Entity status Entity X Entity X Entity X Entity Y Entity Y Entity Y Entity Y Entity Y Entity Y Entity Y Entity Y Synchronisation point Synchronisation point Synchronisation point Synchronisation point Synchronisation point Synchronisation point Synchronisation point Synchronisation point

  5. Higher Higher Authority Authority 2 1 Mutual Synchronisation Mutual Synchronisation Higher Higher Higher Higher Authority Authority Authority Authority Entity status Entity status Entity status Entity status Entity status Entity status Entity status Entity status Entity Y Entity Y Entity X Entity X Entity X Entity X Entity Y Entity Y Synchronisation point Synchronisation point Synchronisation point Synchronisation point

  6. + + Control Control - - Hierarchical Hierarchical Hierarchical Self Self Self Swarming Swarming Swarming Uncoordinated Uncoordinated Uncoordinated Mutual Mutual Mutual - - - peer peer peer – – – – Chaos Chaos synchronisation synchronisation synchronisation synchronisation synchronisation synchronisation behaviour behaviour behaviour activity activity activity synchronisation synchronisation synchronisation Synchronisation process Synchronisation process + + Coordination Coordination Direct Direct Indirect Indirect - - Hierarchical Hierarchical Hierarchical Self Self Self Swarming Swarming Swarming Uncoordinated Uncoordinated Uncoordinated Mutual Mutual Mutual - - - peer peer peer – – – – Chaos Chaos synchronisation synchronisation synchronisation synchronisation synchronisation synchronisation behaviour behaviour behaviour activity activity activity synchronisation synchronisation synchronisation Synchronisation process Synchronisation process

  7. Swarming • An extreme form of self-synchronisation • "The systematic pulsing of force and / or fire by dispersed networked units, so as to strike the adversary from all directions simultaneously.” 1 • The 'emergence' of macro-behaviour - based on the totality of self-synchronised micro-behaviour. 1 (Arquilla, Ronfeldt, Swarming and the future of conflict, RAND Corporation 2000)

  8. Swarming Characteristics • A number (usually many) of low-level components with specialised functions; • multistability – flexible agile capability through clustering of function; • Bifurcation – rapid change of function • Coordination achieved through indirect interaction – very localised SA; • Survival of the collective takes precedence over individual components.

  9. Military swarming • Massed Swarm, implies a convergent attack as a primary manoeuvre • Convergent attack • Encircling and surrounding an adversary • cuts off the adversary’s lines of supply • destroys morale • prevents any possible retreat

  10. Examples of swarming behaviour • Battle of the Atlantic – U Boat “Wolf Pack” operations (1939–1945) • RN Coastal Defence Force (1939-45) • Battle of the Pacific, kamikaze air attacks (1944-45) • FIAC swarms (present day) • Other applications e.g. social swarming

  11. Appropriateness of swarming behaviour in Military Operations • behaviour cannot be controlled, only influenced through prior communication of Command Intent and ROE. • non-linear process – very short-term prediction of behaviour • Large numbers of platforms

  12. 1 1 2 2 50m 50m … … 36 36 2m 2m Etc. Etc. 300m 300m

  13. Constraints • Small platforms not “ocean-going” • Transport assistance from larger platforms • Sustainment requirements: • sufficient crew numbers for the force to operate 24/7; • Maintenance 24/7; • Therefore difficult to achieve sufficient numbers of maritime swarm components in the zone of operations

  14. Conclusions • Much NCW / NEC literature / discussion is phrased as though this is a blank canvas and self-synchronisation is a new concept. This is not the case. • The swarming concept needs to accept : • large numbers of units • less direct control of the self-synchronising / swarming force • less detailed plans • self-synchronising / swarming SA is different from conventional SA • difficult to see how a future maritime force could apply offensive swarming in expeditionary operations • if maritime aircraft and UXVs were to be included in the force then the potential for swarming operations increases.

  15. Questions

More Related