1 / 14

Rethinking Remittances

Rethinking Remittances. Steven Vertovec University of Oxford & ESRC Research Programme on Transnational Communities. Rethinking Remittances. 1. Some facts and trends 2. Patterns of remittance 3. Impacts: economic 4. Impacts: social & cultural 5. Conclusion.

tex
Download Presentation

Rethinking Remittances

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rethinking Remittances Steven Vertovec University of Oxford & ESRC Research Programme on Transnational Communities

  2. Rethinking Remittances 1. Some facts and trends 2. Patterns of remittance 3. Impacts: economic 4. Impacts: social & cultural 5. Conclusion

  3. World Totals - Workers’ Remittances (million $ US)source: International Monetary Fund

  4. Workers’ Remittances - selected Countries (million $ US)source: World Bank, International Monetary Fund

  5. For Example... • El Salvador: greatest relative economic impact in Latin American and Caribbean • remittances estimated at $1.3 billion, but • economy is only $9.5 billion • remittances account for approximately 13 per cent of the economy • exceed the major exports and foreign assistance • up to one-third of families receive remittances

  6. Who sends remittances? • Sent by entire spectrum of migrants: • legal/illegal • permanent/temporary • upper-class/working class • middle-aged/young • married/single • male/female • Changes per length of stay, stage of life

  7. Sent to Whom? • Overwhelmingly, Family… • But divergent patterns of reception: e.g., Bridget Anderson’s research on female migrant domestic workers: • Among 83 women from four nationalities • Only 2 sent money back to husbands (most sent to mothers, sisters, daughters) • “The response was absolutely clear and ‘transnational’: men are not to be trusted.”

  8. Sending Remittances • Firms used by migrants in the USA to transfer money • 43,000 outlets; 36 million transfers in 1996 • ($29.6 billion remitted out of USA in 1996) • average amount remitted: $320 • use variable exchange rates; pay transfers in currencies of country of destination • may skim off around 20 per cent, rather than the often advertised commissions of less than 7 per cent

  9. Sending Remittances (cont’d) • Remittance Means: • Formal government schemes (e.g. bonds) • Checks, money orders, electronic transfers • Couriers, post, carry by self, friends, family • In-kind (clothes, consumer goods) • Means tends to vary by national group • e.g., Salvadoreans: small couriers Dominicans: remesadores Mexicans: money orders & wire

  10. Presumed Negative Effects • Displaces local jobs, income • Induces consumption spending • High import content of consumption • Inflates local prices of land, housing, food • Creates disparity, envy between recipients and non-recipients • Creates dependency

  11. Landless Rural Worker Small Farmer Unskilled Urban Worker Skilled Urban Worker Total Millions of US$remitted 1990 554 62 666 718 2,000 Effect on Production in Agriculture 567 65 622 485 1,739 Petroleum 30 3 31 31 95 Manufacturing 468 53 499 491 1,511 Services 591 58 610 639 1,898 Commerce 403 43 428 404 1,278 Total $2,059 $222 $2,190 $2,050 $6,521 Estimated ‘multiplier’ effects of migradollars on production in Mexico (source: Durand, Parrado and Massey 1996)

  12. Wider Impacts • Community level: • normative transmigration • Building new districts • Local markets more frequent • Hospitals, mosques, schools, orphanages, health clinics, sports facilities • Development: e.g potable water projects • Sustain war effort / perpetuate conflict • More beer! Festivals and celebrations

  13. Wider Impacts (cont’d) • Restructuring local status hierarchies • class, reputation: family and group • Stimulating religious fervour / ritual activity • Altering consumer tastes, styles, expectations • Transforming gender relations • Costlier weddings, inflated dowries • ‘transmigrants get the nicest girls’ [& boys!] (Riccio 1999) – reshaping marriage patterns

  14. Conclusion • Must understand ‘transnationalizing’ of social, cultural, economic and political life • remittance represents not just finance, but the global ‘stretching’ of: • household decision-making • family life course and strategies • collective resources • social structure / cultural institutions • community activities and development • each case highly conditioned by context(s)

More Related