- 50 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Novel representations and methods in text classification

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Novel representations and methods in text classification

Manuel Montes, Hugo Jair Escalante

Instituto Nacional de AstrofÃsica, Ã“ptica y ElectrÃ³nica, Mexico.http://ccc.inaoep.mx/~mmontesg/

http://ccc.inaoep.mx/~hugojair/

{mmontesg, [email protected]

7th Russian Summer School in Information RetrievalKazan, Russia, September 2013

Novel represensations and methods in textclassification

- Text classification is the assignment of free-text documents to one or more predefined categories based on their content
- In this course we will review the basics of text classification (document preprocessing and representation and classifier construction) with emphasis on novel or extended document representations

- We will provide a general introduction to the task of automatic text classification:

- Text classification: manual vs automatic approach
- Machine learning approach to text classification
- BOW: Standard representation for documents
- Main learning algorithms for text classification
- Evaluation of text classification

- This session elaborates on concept-based representations of documents. That is document representations extending the standard representation with â€“latentâ€“ semantic information.
- Distributional representations
- Random indexing
- Concise semantic analysis
- Multimodal representations
- Applications in short-text classification, author profiling and authorship attribution

- This session elaborates on different alternatives that extend the BOW approach by including sequential and syntactic information.
- N-grams
- Maximal frequent sequences
- Pattern sequences
- Locally weighted bag of words
- Syntactic representations
- Applications in authorship attribution

- This session considers text classification techniques specially suited to work with low quality training sets.
- Self-training
- PU-learning
- Consensus classification
- Applications in short-text classification, cross-lingual text classification and opinion spam detection.

- This session presents methods for the automated construction of classification models in the context of text classification.
- Introduction to full model selection
- Related works
- PSMS
- Applications in authorship attribution

ccc.inaoep.mx/~mmontesg/

- Notes of thiscourse
- teaching ïƒ Russir 2013

- teaching ïƒ textmining

- teaching ïƒ informationretrieval

Novel represensations and methods in textclassification

- Text classification is the assignment of free-text documents to one or more predefined categories based on their content

Categories/classes

(e.g., sports, religion, economy)

Documents (e.g., news articles)

- Very accuratewhen job is done by experts
- Different to classify news in general categories than biomedical papers into subcategories.

- But difficult and expensiveto scale
- Different to classify thousands than millions

- Used by Yahoo!, Looksmart, about.com, ODP, Medline, etc.

- Main approach in the 80s
- Disadvantage ïƒ knowledge acquisition bottleneck
- too time consuming, too difficult, inconsistency issues

Experts

Knowledgeengineers

Labeleddocuments

New document

Rule 1, if â€¦ then â€¦ else

Rule N, if â€¦ then â€¦

Documentâ€™s category

Classifier

- Rule-basedclassifier

Hastie et al. The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2007, Springer.

- A general inductive process builds a classifier by learning from a set of preclassified examples.
- Determines the characteristics associated with each one of the topics.

Ronen Feldman and James Sanger, The Text Mining Handbook

Experts

Labeleddocuments(training set)

Learning

algorithm

Newdocument

Rules, trees, probabilities, prototypes, etc.

Documentâ€™scategory

Classifier

How to represent documentâ€™s information?

- First step: transform documents, which typically are strings of characters, into a representation suitable for the learning algorithm.
- Generation of a document-attribute representation

- The most common used document representation is the bag of words.
- Documents are represent by the set of different words in all of the documents
- Word order is not capture by this representation
- There is no attempt for understanding their content

Vocabulary from the collection(set of different words)

All documents

(one vector per document)

Weight indicating the contributionof word j in documenti.

Each different word is a feature!

How to compute their weights?

- Eliminate information about style, such as html or xml tags.
- For some applications this information may be useful. For instance, only index some document sections.

- Remove stop words
- Functional words such as articles, prepositions, conjunctions are not useful (do not have an own meaning).

- Perform stemmingorlemmatization
- The goal is to reduce inflectional forms, and sometimes derivationally related forms.

- am, are, is â†’ be car, cars, carâ€˜s â†’ car

Have to do them always?

- The importance of a term increases proportionally to the number of times it appears in the document.
- It helps to describe documentâ€™s content.

- The general importance of a term decreases proportionally to its occurrences in the entire collection.
- Common terms are not good to discriminate between different classes

- Binary weights:
- wi,j = 1 iff document di contains term tj , otherwise 0.

- Term frequency (tf):
- wi,j = (no. of occurrences of tj in di)

- tf x idf weighting scheme:
- wi,j = tf(tj, di) Ã— idf(tj), where:
- tf(tj, di) indicatestheocurrences of tj in documentdi
- idf(tj) = log [N/df(tj)], wheredf(tj) isthenumber of documetsthatcontainthetermtj.

- wi,j = tf(tj, di) Ã— idf(tj), where:

- Normalization?

- BOW is simple and tend to produce good results, but it has important limitations
- Does not capture word order neither semantic information

- New representations attempt to handle these limitations. Some examples are:
- Distributional term representations
- Locally weighted bag of words
- Bag of concepts
- Concise semantic analysis
- Latent semantic indexing
- Topic modeling
- â€¦

Thetopic of thiscourse

- A central problem in text classification is the high dimensionality of the features space.
- Exist one dimension for each unique word found in the collection ïƒ can reach hundreds of thousands
- Processing is extremely costly in computational terms
- Most of the words (features) are irrelevant to the categorization task
How to select/extract relevant features?

How to evaluate the relevance of the features?

- Feature selection
- Idea: removal of non-informative words according to corpus statistics
- Output: subset of original features

- Main techniques: document frequency, mutual information and information gain

- Idea: combine lower level features (words) into higher-level orthogonal dimensions
- Output: a new set of features (not words)
- Main techniques: word clustering and Latent semantic indexing (LSI)

Out of thescope of thiscourse

Categories

C1

C2

C3

C4

X2

X1

Howtolearnthis?

m1

m3

- A function:
- or:
- Given:

Terms (d = |V|)

Documents (M)

m1

m3

- A function:
- or:
- Given:

Terms (d = |V|)

Documents (M)

- Popular classification algorithms for TC are:
- K-Nearest Neighbors
- Example-based approach

- Centroid-based classification
- Prototype-based approach

- Support Vector Machines
- Kernel-based approach

- NaÃ¯ve Bayes
- Probabilistic approach

- K-Nearest Neighbors

Positive examples

Negative examples

1-nearest neighborclassifier

Positive examples

Negative examples

3-nearest neighborsclassifier

Positive examples

Negative examples

5-nearest neighborsclassifier

- Given a new document d:
- Find the k most similar documents from the training set.
- Common similarity measures are the cosine similarity and the Dice coefficient.

- Assign the class to d by considering the classes of its k nearest neighbors
- Majority voting scheme
- Weighted-sum voting scheme

- Find the k most similar documents from the training set.

- Dice coefficient
- Cosine measure
wki indicates the weight of word k in document i

How to select a good value for K?

http://clopinet.com/CLOP

K=1

http://clopinet.com/CLOP

K=2

http://clopinet.com/CLOP

K=5

http://clopinet.com/CLOP

K=10

Other alternatives for computing the weights?

- One of the best-performing text classifiers.
- It is robust in the sense of not requiring the categories to be linearly separated.
- The major drawback is the computational effort during classification.
- Other limitation is that its performance is primarily determined by the choice of k as well as the distance metric applied.

- Classification of DNA micro-arrays

?

x2

Cancer

?

No Cancer

x1

- A binary SVM classifier can be seen as a hyperplane in the feature space separating the points that represent the positive from negative instances.
- SVMs selects the hyperplanethat maximizes the marginaround it.
- Hyperplanes are fullydetermined by a small subsetof the training instances, calledthe support vectors.

Support vectors

Maximize

margin

Subject to:

When data are linearly separable we have:

x

0

x2

- What about classes whose training instances are not linearly separable?
- The original input space can always be mapped to some higher-dimensional feature space where the training set is separable.
- A kernel function is some function that corresponds to an inner product in some expanded feature space.

- The original input space can always be mapped to some higher-dimensional feature space where the training set is separable.

http://clopinet.com/CLOP

Linear support vector machine

http://clopinet.com/CLOP

Non-linear support vector machine

- The support vector machine (SVM) algorithm is very fast and effective for text classification problems.
- Flexibility in choosing a similarity function
- By means of a kernel function

- Sparseness of solution when dealing with large data sets
- Only support vectors are used to specify the separating hyperplane

- Ability to handle large feature spaces
- Complexity does not depend on the dimensionality of the feature space

- Flexibility in choosing a similarity function

Sec.13.2

- It is the simplest probabilistic classifier used to classify documents
- Based on the application of the Bayes theorem

- Builds a generative model that approximates how data is produced
- Uses prior probability of each category given no information about an item
- Categorization produces a posterior probability distribution over the possible categories given a description of an item.

A. M. Kibriya, E. Frank, B. Pfahringer, G. Holmes. MultinomialNaiveBayesforTextCategorizationRevisited. AustralianConferenceon Artificial Intelligence 2004: 488-499

- Bayes theorem:
- Why?
- We know that:
- Then
- Then

Sec.13.2

- For a document d and a class cj

C

. . . .

t1

t2

t|V|

- Assuming terms are independent of each other given the class (naÃ¯ve assumption)

- Assuming each document is equally probable

Sec.13.2

- For a document d and a class cj

Sec.13.2

- For a document d and a class cj
- Estimation of probabilities

Smoothing to avoid zero-values

Prior probability of class cj

Probability of occurrence of word ti in class cj

- Assignment of the class:
- Assignment using underflow prevention:
- Multiplying lots of probabilities can result in floating-point underflow
- Since log(xy) = log(x) + log(y), it is better to perform all computations by summing logs of probabilities rather than multiplying probabilities

- Very simple classifier which works very well on numerical and textual data
- Very easy to implement and computationally cheap when compared to other classification algorithms.
- One of its major limitations is that it performs very poorly when features are highly correlated.
- Concerning text classification, it fails to consider the frequency of word occurrences in the feature vector.

- What to evaluate?
- How to carry out this evaluation?
- Which elements (information) are required?

- How to know which is the best classifer for a given task?
- Which things are important to perform a fair comparison?

- Performance of classifiers is evaluated experimentally
- Requires a document set labeled with categories.
- Divided into two parts: training and test sets
- Usually, the test set is the smaller of the two

- A method to smooth out the variations in the corpus is the n-fold cross-validation.
- The whole document collection is divided into n equal parts, and then the training-and-testing process is run n times, each time using a different part of the collection as the test set. Then the results for n folds are averaged.

m1

m3

Terms (N = |V|)

Documents (M)

- The available data is divided into two subsets:
- Training (m1)
- used for the construction (learning) the classifier

- Test (m2)
- Used for the evaluation of the classifier

- Training (m1)

- Considering a binary problem
- Recall for a category is defined as the percentage of correctly classified documents among all documents belonging to that category, and precision is the percentage of correctly classified documents among all documents that were assigned to the category by the classifier.
What happen if there are more than two classes?

Label YES

Label NO

a

b

Classifier YES

c

d

Classifier NO

- Macroaveraging: Compute performance for each category, then average.
- Gives equal weights to all categories

- Microaveraging: Compute totals of a, b, c and d for all categories, and then compute performance measures.
- Gives equal weights to all documents
Is it important the selection of the averaging strategy?

What happen if we are very bad classifying the minority class?

- Gives equal weights to all documents

- G. Forman. An Extensive Empirical Study of Feature Selection Metrics for Text Classification. JMLR, 3:1289â€”1305, 2003
- H. Liu, H. Motoda. Computational Methods of Feature Selection. Chapman & Hall, CRC, 2008.
- Y. Yang, J. O. Pedersen. A Comparative Study on Feature Selection in Text Categorization. Proc. of the 14th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 412â€”420, 1997.
- D. Mladenic, M. Grobelnik. Feature Selection for Unbalanced Class Distribution and NaÃ¯ve Bayes. Proc. of the 16th Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 258â€”267, 1999.
- I. Guyon, et al. FeatureExtractionFoundations and Applications,Springer, 2006.
- Guyon, A. Elisseeff. An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection. Journal of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 3:1157â€”1182, 2003.
- M. Lan, C. Tan, H. Low, S. Sung. A comprehensive comparative study on term weighting schemes for text categorization with support vector machines. Proc. of WWW, pp. 1032â€”1033, 2005.

Questions?