1 / 14

Tor Einar Johnsen The Research Council of Norway

EU FP6 Priority 3 NMP N anotechnologies and nano-sciences, knowledge-based M ulti-functional materials and new P roduction processes and devices Status for Norway after 1. Call. Tor Einar Johnsen The Research Council of Norway. NMP: Norwegian success ?. 1. Call. FP6-2002-NMP-1 2003

tess
Download Presentation

Tor Einar Johnsen The Research Council of Norway

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EU FP6 Priority 3 NMPNanotechnologies and nano-sciences, knowledge-based Multi-functional materials and new Production processes and devicesStatus for Norway after 1. Call Tor Einar Johnsen The Research Council of Norway NMP seminar, 09.01.04

  2. NMP: Norwegian success ? NMP seminar, 09.01.04

  3. 1. Call • FP6-2002-NMP-1 2003 • New instruments (IP, NE) 260 M€ • Trad. Instrum. (STREP, CA, SSA)140 M€ • Norway 11 points • FP6-2002-NMP-2 IP’s for SME • New instruments (IP) 40 M€ • Norway 0 points! NMP seminar, 09.01.04

  4. Participation • 103 proposals with 149 Norwegian partners • Final results: 11 proposals with 14 Norwegian partners NMP seminar, 09.01.04

  5. Participation NMP seminar, 09.01.04

  6. Who participated? HE – Higher education RES – Research institute IND – Industry ISME - Industrial SME OSME – Other SME NMP seminar, 09.01.04

  7. Who were successful participants ? NMP seminar, 09.01.04

  8. Who are the Norwegian partners ? NMP seminar, 09.01.04

  9. Who are the Norwegian partners ? NMP seminar, 09.01.04

  10. Comparison to Finland NMP seminar, 09.01.04

  11. Comparison to Denmark NMP seminar, 09.01.04

  12. Norwegian summary, NMP-1 • Traditional instruments: STREP, CA and SSA • Low Norwegian ”score” • Success rate 10,3% (Finland 27,4%) • New instruments: IP and NE • Low Norwegian ”score” • Success rate 6,5% (Finland 9,2%) • No Norwegian partners in IP! • 3 (2) institutes in 2 NE! • KeraNor is the only Norwegian industrial partner (STRP) NMP seminar, 09.01.04

  13. Concludingremarks • Very low participation from Norway • Have we failed to inform about possibilities? • Too much nano? • Too little about multifunctional materials and processes • Not relevant for the Norwegian industry? • Too early for the Norwegian research community? • Low interaction between institutes and industry NMP seminar, 09.01.04

  14. Can we improve? • Need closer cooperation between institutes and industries • National funding for participating institutes • Less costly for research institutes to participate • Less costly for industry (not paying institutes) • More resources in the Norwegian Research Council Thank You ! NMP seminar, 09.01.04

More Related