1 / 11

Beam profile vs time

Beam profile vs time. Analyzed Vx vs Vy distributions vs time for Run 72 (13:26:02 – 28:25) Run 73 (13:36:10 – 13:37:30) Run 74 (43:12 – 44:21) Binned distributions with the same Vernier scan location No Z vertex cuts Cut on Vr < 2. Rosi Reed rjreed@ucdavis.edu 6/9/08.

terriwilliams
Download Presentation

Beam profile vs time

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Beam profile vs time • Analyzed Vx vs Vy distributions vs time for • Run 72 (13:26:02 – 28:25) • Run 73 (13:36:10 – 13:37:30) • Run 74 (43:12 – 44:21) • Binned distributions with the same Vernier scan location • No Z vertex cuts • Cut on Vr < 2 Rosi Reed rjreed@ucdavis.edu 6/9/08

  2. Gaussian Multiplication • Beam is gaussian in shape • Distribution of collisions in xy space is equal to the beam distributions multiplied by each other • Also gaussian in shape

  3. Assuming the beams have the same width

  4. Vernier Scan

  5. Beam profile vs time Summary # Beam-Beam Events Calculated from Vx vs Vy distributions

  6. Plots with less than 12 data points not included

  7. Beam Sigmas calculated from formula on pg 3 Error reflect statistical error only Sigma X = 1.75 mm +/- .20 Sigma Y = 2.40 mm +/- .15 If our assumptions are correct, these distributions should be flat

  8. Horizontal Vernier Scan Slope should be +/- 0.5 if our assumptions were correct

  9. Vertical Vernier Scan Slope should be +/- 0.5 if our assumptions were correct

  10. Some comments • I noticed that as the good event rate went down, the ratio of good events to beam pipe events went down • I would like to quantify this next week • No events with a vertex in Run 72 between 13:23:29 and 26:02 • I have not looked at what happened in Run 73 between ~13:30 and 35 • We conclude that the widths of the beams are • Sigma X = 1.75 mm +/- .20 • Sigma Y = 2.40 mm +/- .15

More Related