1 / 30

Indoor Location Sensing Using Geo-Magnetism

MobiSys 2011. Indoor Location Sensing Using Geo-Magnetism. Jaewoo Chung, Matt Donahoe , Chris Schmandt , Ig -Jae Kim, Pedram Razavai , Micaela Wiseman. - Twohsien 2011.10.31. OUTLINE. Introduction System overview Evaluation Conclusion Discussion. OUTLINE. Introduction

terrell
Download Presentation

Indoor Location Sensing Using Geo-Magnetism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MobiSys 2011 Indoor Location Sensing Using Geo-Magnetism JaewooChung, Matt Donahoe, Chris Schmandt, Ig-Jae Kim, PedramRazavai, MicaelaWiseman -Twohsien 2011.10.31

  2. OUTLINE • Introduction • System overview • Evaluation • Conclusion • Discussion

  3. OUTLINE • Introduction • System overview • Evaluation • Conclusion • Discussion

  4. INTRODUCTION • Disturbance of the Earth’s magnetic field • Steel and concrete skeletons Fingerprint!!

  5. INTRODUCTION • Scope of this work • Characteristics of magnetic field signatures • Performance of positioning system • Reducing outliers

  6. OUTLINE • Introduction • System overview • Evaluation • Conclusion • Discussion

  7. SYSTEM OVERVIEW • The observed characteristics of indoor magnetic fields • E-compass HMC6343 • Stepper motor

  8. SYSTEM OVERVIEW

  9. SYSTEM OVERVIEW • RMS difference

  10. SYSTEM OVERVIEW

  11. SYSTEM OVERVIEW

  12. SYSTEM OVERVIEW

  13. OUTLINE • Introduction • System overview • Evaluation • Conclusion • Discussion

  14. EVALUATION • Wearable device

  15. EVALUATION • Test sites

  16. EVALUATION • Result of performance

  17. EVALUATION • Result of performance

  18. EVALUATION • 75.7% < 1m

  19. EVALUATION • vectors

  20. EVALUATION • Modified algorithm • Varying the search space from the last known position • Filtering the predicted position by adding conditions in our algorithm

  21. EVALUATION

  22. EVALUATION 86% < 1m 88% < 1m

  23. EVALUATION

  24. EVALUATION • Different floor

  25. EVALUATION • Long term performance

  26. EVALUATION • Effects near moving objects

  27. OUTLINE • Introduction • System overview • Evaluation • Conclusion • Discussion

  28. CONCLUSION

  29. OUTLINE • Introduction • System overview • Evaluation • Conclusion • Discussion

  30. DISCUSSION • Advantage: • no infrastructure overhead • Disadvantage: • Outlier could be placed at any location • Error increases with the size of map • Effort and time required

More Related