Tgmb agenda january 2010
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 19

TGmb Agenda, January 2010 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 85 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

TGmb Agenda, January 2010. Authors:. Date: 2010-03-15. Abstract. Agenda for the TGmb meeting in Orlando, Florida, USA from March 15-18, 2010. Monday PM1 15 March 2010, 13:30 – 15:30. Call meeting to order. Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform.

Download Presentation

TGmb Agenda, January 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Tgmb agenda january 2010

TGmb Agenda, January 2010

Authors:

Date: 2010-03-15

Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


Abstract

Abstract

Agenda for the TGmb meeting in Orlando, Florida, USA from March 15-18, 2010.

Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


Monday pm1 15 march 2010 13 30 15 30

Monday PM115 March 2010, 13:30 – 15:30

  • Call meeting to order

Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


Participants patents and duty to inform

Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform

All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants:

  • “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents

    • “Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents orpatent claims

  • “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents)

  • The above does not apply if the patentclaim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group

    Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2

  • Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged

  • No duty to perform a patent search

  • Slide #1

    Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


    Patent related links

    Patent Related Links

    All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development.

    Patent Policy is stated in these sources:

    IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws

    http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6

    IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual

    http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3

    Material about the patent policy is available at

    http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html

    If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at [email protected] or visit http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/index.html

    This slide set is available at http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt

    Slide #2

    Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


    Call for potentially essential patents

    Call for Potentially Essential Patents

    • If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance:

      • Either speak up now or

      • Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or

      • Cause an LOA to be submitted

    Slide #3

    Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


    Other guidelines for ieee wg meetings

    Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings

    • All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws.

      • Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims.

      • Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions.

        • Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings.

          • Technical considerations remain primary focus

      • Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets.

      • Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation.

      • Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object.

        ---------------------------------------------------------------

        See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause 5.3.10 and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details.

    Slide #4

    Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


    Resources urls

    Resources – URLs

    • Link to IEEE Disclosure of Affiliation

      • http://standards.ieee.org/faqs/affiliationFAQ.html

    • Links to IEEE Antitrust Guidelines

      • http://standards.ieee.org/resources/antitrust-guidelines.pdf

    • Link to IEEE Code of Ethics

      • http://www.ieee.org/web/membership/ethics/code_ethics.html

    • Link to IEEE Patent Policy

      • http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt

    Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


    Meeting etiquette

    Meeting Etiquette

    • IEEE 802 is a world-wide professional technical organization

    • Meetings are to be conducted in an orderly and professionalmanner in accordance with the policies and procedures governed by the organization.

    • Individuals are to address the “Technical” content of the subject under consideration and refrain from making “personal” comments to or about the presenter.

    Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


    Monday pm1 continued 15 march 2010 13 30 15 30

    Monday PM1 (continued)15 March 2010, 13:30 – 15:30

    • Attendance recording procedures

      • See 11-09/0246r0

      • https://murphy.events.ieee.org/imat

      • Must register before logging attendance

      • Must log attendance during each 2 hour session

    • Documentation

      • http://mentor.ieee.org

      • Use “TGm” for documents relating to the Revision PAR

    Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


    Monday pm1 continued 15 march 2010 13 30 15 301

    Monday PM1 (continued)15 March 2010, 13:30 – 15:30

    • Results from LB160 (REVmb-D2.0)

      • 166 affirmative (89%), 20 negative (11%), with 25 abstentions

      • Change from LB 149: +11 affirmative, -3 negative, -4 abstensions

      • This was a recirculation ballot; all comments must be against changed text

      • 246 comments received (195 technical), stored in 11-09/0706r7

    • Plan of record on next slide

    Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


    Current tgmb plan of record

    Current TGmb Plan of Record

    • May 2008 – Issue Call for Comment/Input

    • July 2008 – begin process input and old Interpretation requests

      Acknowledge previous Task Group referrals

    • Sept 2008 – PAR revision process started

    • Nov 2008 – close receipt of new input

    • Nov 2008 – WG/EC approval of PAR Revision

    • Dec 2008 – NesCom/SASB approval PAR Revision

    • May 2009 – First WG Letter ballot

      • (includes All published Amendments as of May 2009)

    • Nov 2009 – Recirc start

    • May 2010 – Form Sponsor Pool (45 days)

    • July 2010 – Sponsor Ballot Start

      • (Include all published amendments as of July 2010)

    • November 2010 – Sponsor Recirc

    • March 2011 – WG/EC Final Approval

    • June 2011 – RevCom/SASB Approval

    Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


    Monday pm1 continued 15 march 2010 13 30 15 302

    Monday PM1 (continued)15 March 2010, 13:30 – 15:30

    • Approval of minutes of prior meetings

      • January 2010 minutes: 11-10/0075r0 – https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-0075-00-000m-minutes-of-tgmb-jan-2010-la-interim.doc

      • Teleconference minutes: 11-10/0214r3 -- https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-0214-03-000m-january-february-march-2010-tgmb-teleconference-minutes.doc

    • Draft Update & Editor’s Report (Adrian Stephens)

    Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


    Monday pm1 continued 15 march 2010 13 30 15 303

    Monday PM1 (continued)15 March 2010, 13:30 – 15:30

    • Comment Resolution

      • Three ad hoc databases: GEN, MAC, and SECURITY

      • Comments are in 11-09/790r9 (filter on letter ballot column)

    • CID 2092 submission – 11-10/0308r0 (Adrian Stephens)

    • CID 2115 submission – 11-10/0300r0 (Bill Marshall)

    • Comment Resolution

      • Recycled comment discussion

    Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


    Tuesday pm1 16 march 2010 13 30 15 30

    Tuesday PM116 March 2010, 13:30 – 15:30

    • 13:30–14:15: Security Comment Resolution

      • OKC Clarification: 11-10/0209r0 (Dan Harkins)

    • 14:15–15:30: Admission Control Comment Resolution (Dave Stephenson)

      • CIDs 2227, 2228, 2232, 2234, 2238, and 2241

    Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


    Tuesday pm2 16 march 2010 16 00 18 00

    Tuesday PM216 March 2010, 16:00 – 18:00

    • Approval motions for teleconference recommendations

      • Editorial comments

      • CIDs 2214 & 2039

      • GEN: Clause 11.3, Gen Tab C/D/E, MIB

    • Comment Resolution

      • Recycled editorial comments

      • Remaining clause 11.3 comments (Jon Rosdahl)

    Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


    Wednesday pm1 17 march 2010 13 30 15 30

    Wednesday PM117 March 2010, 13:30 – 15:30

    • Joint Regulatory Session

      • Discussion of LB 160 CID 2113

      • Presentation: 11-10/0210r6 (Peter Ecclesine)

      • Motion to approve 11-10/0210r6

    • Additional Comment Resolution

      • CID 2219 presentation: 11-10/0313r0 (Robert Stacey)

    Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


    Wednesday pm2 17 march 2010 16 00 18 00

    Wednesday PM217 March 2010, 16:00 – 18:00

    • Comment Resolution Motions

      • Recycled editor comments

      • Security

      • MAC: Motion A, Motion Admission Control A, Motion AS

    • Comment Resolution

      • Remaining MAC comments

      • Generate Resolutions for OKC Comments

    Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


    Thursday pm2 18 march 2010 16 00 18 00

    Thursday PM218 March 2010, 16:00 – 18:00

    • Comment Resolution

    • Comment Resolution Sanity Check

      …in preparation for:

    • Letter Ballot Authorization Motion

    • Preparation for May 2010 meeting

    • Teleconferences/ad hocs

    • Review Timeline (slide 13)

    • AOB

    • Adjourn

    Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks


  • Login